Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 12, pp 2511–2520 | Cite as

On-line coupling of fizzy extraction with gas chromatography

  • Hao-Chun Yang
  • Pawel L. UrbanEmail author
Paper in Forefront

Abstract

Fizzy extraction (FE) is carried out by first dissolving a carrier gas (typically, carbon dioxide) in a liquid sample at a moderate pressure (typically, 150 kPa) and then rapidly depressurizing the sample. The depressurization leads to instant release of numerous microbubbles in the liquid matrix. The abruptly released gas extracts the volatile solutes and elutes them toward a detector in a short period of time. Here, we describe on-line coupling of FE with gas chromatography (GC). The two platforms are highly compatible and could be combined following several modifications of the interface and adjustments of the extraction sequence. The analytes are released within a short period of time (1.5 s). Thus, the chromatographic peaks are satisfactorily narrow. There is no need to trap the extracted analytes in a loop or on a sorbent, as it is done in standard headspace and microextraction methods. The approach requires only minor sample pretreatment. The main parameters of the FE-GC-mass spectrometry (MS) method were optimized. The results of FE were compared with those of headspace flushing (scavenging headspace vapors), and the enhancement factors were in the order of ~ 2 to 13 (for various analytes). The limits of detection for some of the tested analytes were lower in the proposed FE-GC-MS method than in FE combined with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization MS. The method was further tested in analyses of selected real samples (apple flavor milk, mixed fruit and vegetable juice drink, mango flavored drink, pineapple green tea, toothpaste, and yogurt).

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Extraction Gas chromatography Sample preparation Volatile organic compounds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan (grant numbers 104-2628-M-007-006-MY4 and 107-3017-F-007-002), the National Chiao Tung University, the National Tsing Hua University, the Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters, and the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project established by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan (grant numbers 104-2628-M-007-006-MY4 and 107–3017-F-007-002)

Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan

Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters

National Tsing Hua University

National Chiao Tung University

Compliance with ethical standards

All authors contributed to the work, read the manuscript, and agreed to be listed as an author.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1755_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1787 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chang C-H, Urban PL. Fizzy extraction of volatile and semivolatile compounds into the gas phase. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8735–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang H-C, Chang C-H, Urban PL. Fizzy extraction of volatile organic compounds combined with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization quadrupole mass spectrometry. J Vis Exp. 2017;125:e56008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lalezary S, Pirbazari M, McGuire MJ, Krasner SW. Air stripping of taste and odor compounds from water. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1984;76:83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Komthong P, Katoh T, Igura N, Shimoda M, Hayakawa I. Ascending bubble extraction of terpenes from freshly squeezed orange juice. Food Res Int. 2006;39:53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chingin K, Cai Y, Liang J, Chen H. Simultaneous preconcentration and desalting of organic solutes in aqueous solutions by bubble bursting. Anal Chem. 2016;88:5033–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urban PL. Quantitative mass spectrometry: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2016;374:20150382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2007;26:51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shimoda M, Ishikawa H, Kawano T, Osajima Y. Extraction of volatile compounds from aqueous solution using micro bubble, gaseous, supercritical and liquid carbon dioxide. J Food Sci. 1994;59:231–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang T, Lenahan R. Determination of volatile halocarbons in water by purge-closed loop gas chromatography. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1984;32:429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chromservis—dynamic headspace. https://www.chromserviseu/i/dynamic-headspace?lang=EN Accessed 19 Nov 2018.
  11. 11.
    Heikes DL, Jensen SR, Fleming-Jones ME. Purge and trap extraction with GC-MS determination of volatile organic compounds in table-ready foods. J Agric Food Chem. 1995;43:2869–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zang LH, Liu YL, Liu JQ, Tian Q, Xiang FN. An improved method for testing weak VOCs in dry plants with a purge and trap concentrator coupled to GC-MS. Chromatographia. 2008;68:351–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baranowska I, editor. Handbook of trace analysis. New York: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fritz JS, Scott DM. Statistical approach to chromatographic theory. J Chromatogr. 1983;271:193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahuja S, Alsante K. Handbook of isolation and characterization of impurities in pharmaceuticals. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill JH, Petrucci RH, McCreary TW, Perry SS. General chemistry. London: Pearson; 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sigma-Aldrich Corporation. Aldrich catalog handbook of fine chemicals. Milwaukee: Aldrich Chemical Company; 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dong LL, He L, Tao GH, Hu G. High yield of ethyl valerate from the esterification of renewable valeric acid catalyzed by amino acid ionic liquids. RSC Adv. 2013;3:4806–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ongaratto RS, Silva MMN, Lage PLC, Borges CP. Extraction of aroma compounds of fruit juices by air stripping using a bubble column operating with antifoam and its effect on juice properties. J Food Eng. 2015;159:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wallek T, Knöbelreiter K, Rarey J. Estimation of pure-component properties of biodiesel-related components: fatty acid ethyl esters. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:3382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Konieczka P, Namieśnik J. Quality assurance and quality control in the analytical chemical laboratory: a practical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Francis and Taylor; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu J-B, Gunathilake S, Chen Y-C, Urban PL. On the dynamics of kefir volatome. RSC Adv. 2014;4:28865–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dias ALB, Santos P, Martínez J. Supercritical CO2 technology applied to the production of flavor ester compounds through lipase-catalyzed reaction: a review. J CO2 Util. 2018;23:159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andrade EHA, Maia JGS, Zoghbi MGB. Aroma volatile constituents of Brazilian varieties of mango fruit. J Food Compos Anal. 2000;13:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quijano CE, Salamanca G, Pino JA. Aroma volatile constituents of Colombian varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Flavour Fragr J. 2007;22:401–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang H-H, Urban PL. Dry ice fog extraction of volatile organic compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.052.
  27. 27.
    Shang C-Q, Deng C-H, Zhang X-Y, Chen Z-F, Hu Y-M. Headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of free volatile compounds in mango. Chromatographia. 2002;11:737–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madrera RR, García NP, Hevia AG, Valles BS. Application of purge and trap extraction and gas chromatography for determination of minor esters in cider. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1069:245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang H-H, Dutkiewicz EP, Urban PL. Kinetic study of continuous liquid-liquid extraction of wine with real-time detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1034:85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barros EP, Moreira N, Pereira GE, Leite SGF, Rezende CM, Pinho PG. Development and validation of automatic HS-SPME with a gas chromatography-ion trap/mass spectrometry method for analysis of volatiles in wines. Talanta. 2012;101:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Horstkotte B, de los Mozos Atochero NL, Solich P. Lab-in-syringe automation of stirring-assisted room-temperature headspace extraction coupled online to gas chromatography with flame ionization detection for determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes in surface waters. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1555:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang J, Bryant-Genevier J, Nuñovero N, Zhang C, Kraay B, Zhan C, et al. Compact prototype microfabricated gas chromatographic analyzer for autonomous determinations of VOC mixtures at typical workplace concentrations. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2018;4:17101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Regmi BP, Agah M. Micro gas chromatography: an overview of critical components and their integration. Anal Chem. 2018;90:13133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Applied ChemistryNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  3. 3.Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of MattersNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations