Origins of the method of standard additions and of the use of an internal standard in quantitative instrumental chemical analyses
- 121 Downloads
The origin of the method of standard additions (SAM) and of the use of internal standard (IS) in instrumental chemical analysis and their spread into other areas has been reviewed. Recorded applications of IS range from flame spectroscopy in 1877 through multiple techniques to current use in NMR and standard additions with isotopically labelled internal standards in hyphenated techniques. For SAM, applications stemmed from polarography in 1937 and spread to most instrumental methods. Some misconceptions on priorities are corrected.
KeywordsHistory Internal standards Method of standard additions
The method of standard additions (SAM) and internal standard (IS) are regularly used and regarded as self-evident concepts to modern analytical chemists, thus apparently requiring no history. However, we will show both stem from the original work of several chemists whose priority should be properly acknowledged. The two methods are related by the addition of analytes to the sample but they are quite different; SAM uses known additions of the same analyte whilst IS uses a known amount of an easily measured analyte that is absent, or essentially absent, from the sample. The origin of both procedures is missing from most texts on instrumental methods of analysis [e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The histories of both procedures have been reviewed [7, 8], both are of interest in that they each have suffered from misrepresentations as to their originators and in their initial applications in various technique areas.
Method of standard additions
Polarography 1937 onwards
Burriel-Martí and Ramírez-Muños (1957) state  “This is a very simple method of obtaining experimental values, which has been known and widely used for a long time in all instrumental analyses (colorimetry, spectrography, polarography etc.), as it allows working with some accuracy without corrections and without adding reference elements (internal standards)”.
Kelly et al. state that the first use of the term “standard addition” in English was by Lingane and Kerlinger in 1941 . The early polarographers only used a single addition until Kemula in 1966 introduced multiple additions in what he called the “sluice addition method” [15, 16].
Atomic spectrometry 1950 onwards
The first recent use of the method of standard additions outside the area of polarography was in atomic emission spectrometry as described in Harvey’s book, Spectrochemical Procedures , who referred to the method as an extrapolation method. The calibration graphs were presented by Harvey, not as used today, but with the axes reversed, using the abscissa (x axis) for instrument response, and the ordinate (y axis) for the addition amounts. Neither Lingane and Kerlinger, Kemula nor Harvey made reference to the work of Hohn.
Kelly et al. discussed the priority for the use of SAM beyond the field of polarography noting its use in emission spectrography by Harvey, reported in 1950 . However, their analysis of priority between Campbell and Carl’s use in X-ray fluorescence (1954)  and Chow and Thompson’s use in flame photometry (1955)  is rendered pointless in the light of Chow and Thompson’s reference to Smales  (their reference ). The incorrect priority given to Chow and Thompson’s work was first stated in 2008 .
Smales in 1951 used the method of standard additions in flame photometry, interestingly plotting the data in the same manner as Harvey  but with no reference to his reasons, or reference to Harvey or to Hohn . The paper by Smales was also missed by Mavrodineanu and Boiteux , who noted Harvey, but said erroneously that SAM was first applied in flame spectroscopy in 1957 by Fukushima et al. .
The standard addition-logarithmic extrapolation is available when the emission intensity is not linear with concentration in arc and spark  and in flame excitation . In 1980, Bader  discussed the possible errors in the use of SAM and its application to potentiometry and to isotope dilution analysis but again gave no reference to Hohn. Ellison and Thompson have discussed the myth and reality of SAM  and Anderson has recently revisited the SAM to review its performance parameters .
1H NMR 2012 onwards
In a review of Quantitative1H NMR spectroscopy, the use of both SAM and IS was outlined .
UV-visible spectrometry 1960 onwards
Other than the tangential reference in 1957 to “colorimetry”  and despite extensive searches via SciFinder and journals (manually), it has not so far been possible to locate the first clear use of SAM in UV-visible spectrometry. The late adoption in UV-visible spectrophotometry is probably due to the intensive interest by inorganic analysts in the 1950s in new and selective colorimetric reagents and in the masking of interfering ions. Organic analysts used separations or corrected for irrelevant absorptions in the ultraviolet region using the Morton and Stubbs procedure  and its subsequent developments . The earliest reference to hand, 1960, concerns the separation of microgram amounts of cobalt from nickel followed by determination with nitroso-R salt at 529 nm, no details were given, only the statement, “to estimate the efficiency of the method described, the method of standard addition of cobalt was followed” . In 1961, a single standard addition procedure was published for the determination of sodium ethyl-mercurithiosalicylate .
Use of internal standards
Flame spectroscopy 1877 onwards
Chromatography 1954 onwards
The IS method is widely used in gas and in liquid chromatography for several reasons including avoidance of the need for measuring very accurately sample injection volumes and to compensate for sample losses between injection and detection and variable detector response. In Strouts et al. , the use of IS in GLC they cite was that by Ray in 1954 . An early example of the use of IS in HPLC was in the determination of benzenepolycarboxylic acids .
1H NMR 2012 onwards
The first quantitative applications of 1H NMR were described in 1963 [42, 43]. The addition of the internal standard directly to the sample can be avoided in quantitative NMR by using a co-axial stem insert to the NMR tube whereby the standard is surrounded by the sample and thus both measured under the same conditions . The selection of appropriate standards has for quantification by 1H NMR been discussed by Rundlöf et al. . The progress of NMR spectroscopy in food analysis is the subject of an ongoing RSC series “Magnetic resonance in food science” and has been reviewed for food analysis in particular . The recent availability of low-cost, bench-top 1H NMR has produced useful data on foodstuffs, for example on the origin  and on the adulteration of honey .
Spectrometry and spectroscopy1947 onwards
The problems with and the choice of appropriate IS in quantitative Raman spectrometry have been outlined . An early example, if not the first, is that of antimony trioxide in the determination of the amounts of orthorhombic and tetragonal phases in samples of lead monoxide . The use of an IS in quantitative infrared spectroscopy to avoid needing to determine sample thickness when using Nujol mulls dates back to 1947  and 10 years later, for potassium bromide discs .
Both SAM and IS continue to be of great utility to analytical chemists. However, for the sake of historical accuracy and due acknowledgement of priority of invention, students should be taught the origins of the method of standard additions and that of the use of internal standards in chemical analysis.
The first use of a standard addition method in instrumental chemical analysis was that in polarography by Hohn in 1937. There have been some misunderstandings in the literature about its first use in other technique areas.
The first use of an internal standard was that by Gouy in 1887 in flame emission spectroscopy. Following the extensive studies by Gerlach of the sensitive multi-element emission spectrometric analysis, in the late 1920s, and subsequent appreciation of the concept, it has spread into numerous other technique areas.
We await with interest any published applications of SAM and/or IS in analytical molecular biology although here the specificity of PCR may render its use unnecessary in routine applications.
The authors thank members of the Division of Analytical Chemistry of EuChemS for their interest and support for this and other studies into the history of analytical chemistry in Europe. We thank Malcolm Burns for interesting discussions on molecular biology and Richard Brown for the data in Fig. 3. MJW gratefully acknowledges part funding through the UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy as part of the Government Chemist Programme 2017-2020.
Compliance with ethical standards
No animals involved
No informed consents required
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Willard H, Merritt L Jr, Dean J, Settle FA Jr. Instrumental methods of analysis. 7th ed. New York: Wadsworth; 1988.Google Scholar
- 2.Strobel HA, Heineman WR. Chemical instrumentation: a systematic approach. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1989.Google Scholar
- 3.Dean JA. Analytical chemistry handbook. New York: McGraw Hill; 1995.Google Scholar
- 4.R. Kellner and H. M. Widmer (eds), J-M Mermet. M Otto and M Valcarcel Analytical chemistry, a modern approach to analytical science, 2nd edn, Wiley-VHC, (2004).Google Scholar
- 5.Robinson JW, Frame EMS, Frame GM II. Undergraduate instrumental analysis. 7th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 6.Skoog DA, Halley FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of instrumental analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cenage Learning; 2017.Google Scholar
- 8.Thomsen V. Walther Gerlach and the foundations of modern spectrochemical analysis. Spectroscopy. 2002;17:117–20.Google Scholar
- 9.Burriel-Martí F, Ramírez-Muñoz J, Photometry F. A manual of methods and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1957.Google Scholar
- 10.Hohn H. Chemischen Analysen mit dem Polarographen, J: Springer Verlag, Berlin; 1937. p. 84.Google Scholar
- 11.Heyrovský J. Polarograhie. In: Bottger W, editor. Physikalische Methoden der Analyschen Chemie, Zr 3. Liepzg: Akademischen Verlageesellschaft; 1936. p. 260–322.Google Scholar
- 12.Glasstone S. In: Hohn H, editor. Review, Chemische Analysen mit dem Polarographen, vol. 63. Leipzig: Springer; 1937. Analyst (1938). p. 224–5.Google Scholar
- 13.Varasova EN. The polarograhic analysis of minerals I. Zavod Lab. 1937;6:804–7.Google Scholar
- 14.Lingane JJ, Kerlinger H. Polarographic determination of nickel and cobalt. Ind Eng Chem. 1941;13:77–80.Google Scholar
- 16.Kemula W. Polarograhic methods of analysis. Pure Appl Chem. 1969;15:283–96.Google Scholar
- 17.Harvey CE. Spectrochemical procedures. Glendale: Applied Research Laboratories; 1950). In particular. p. 218–24.Google Scholar
- 22.Mavrodineanu R, Boiteux H. Flame Spectroscopy. New York: Wiley; 1966.Google Scholar
- 23.Fukushima S, Takahashi K, Terasaka S, Otozai K. New application of addition-standard technique in flame spectrophotometry. Microchim Acta. 1957:183–95.Google Scholar
- 33.Neurath AR. Spektrofotometrické stanovenie ethylmerkuritosalicylanu sodného. Ceeskoslov Farm. 1961;10:75–8.Google Scholar
- 34.Gouy GL. Recherches photométriques sur les flames colorées. Compt Rend (1877). 85:70–2.Google Scholar
- 35.Barnes RB, Richardson D, Berry JW, Hood RL. Flame photometry. A rapid analytical procedure. Ind Eng Chem. 1944;17:605–11.Google Scholar
- 36.Gerlach W, Schweitzer E. Foundations and methods of chemical analysis by the emission spectrum. A. Hilger, London, ((1929), and refs therein. This is the English translation of Die chemische Emission –spektralanalyse, Voss, Leipzig, (1928).Google Scholar
- 38.Butler LRP, Strasheim A. Multiple-element atomic absorption analysis. Spectrochim Acta. 1965;(7):1207–7.Google Scholar
- 39.Strouts CRN, Wilson HN, Parry-Jones RT. Chemical analysis: the working tools, vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1962.Google Scholar
- 41.Aurenge J. Séparation et dosage par chromatographie liquid sous haute pression des acides benzènepolycarboxyliques. J Chromatogr. 84:285–98.Google Scholar
- 45.Syros A, Dais P. NMR spectroscopy in food analysis. Cambridge: RSC; 2013.Google Scholar
- 49.Trisham GM. Quantitative analysis of orthorhombic and tetragonal lead monoxide mixtures using internal standard Raman spectroscopy. Proc Electrochem Soc. 1984;84-14:33–43.Google Scholar
- 50.Barnes RB, Gore RC, Williams EF, Linsley SG, Petersen EM. Infrared analysis of crystalline penicillins. Ind Eng Chem Anal Edn. 1947;19:620–7.Google Scholar
- 52.Pang S, Cowen S. A generic standard additions based method to determine endogenous analyte concentrations by immunoassays to overcome complex biological matrix interference. Sci Rep. 7(1):17542.Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.