Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 12, pp 2687–2696 | Cite as

Analysis and fate of 14 relevant wastewater-derived organic pollutants in long-term exposed soil

  • Nicola MontemurroEmail author
  • Cristina Postigo
  • Serge Chirón
  • Damiá Barcelò
  • Sandra Pérez
Research Paper


The growing use of reclaimed water in agriculture worldwide calls for developing high-sensitivity methods to quantify wastewater-derived organic contaminants in soils so that the potential risk of this irrigation practice can be properly assessed. This work describes an analytical method for the determination of trace levels of 14 drugs that are known to be poorly removed during conventional wastewater treatment in soil. The analytes selected for investigation included ten pharmaceuticals from different therapeutic classes (carbamazepine, diclofenac, cis-diltiazem, lamotrigine, methadone, midazolam, oxcarbazepine, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, valsartan), one illicit drug (cocaine), and three transformation products/metabolites (acridone, 4′-hydroxydiclofenac, and valsartan acid), thereby covering a broad range of physical–chemical properties. The methodology developed was based on ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE) of the analytes from the soil matrix, and subsequent clean-up and analysis of the USE extracts with a fully automated approach by means of solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry detection (online SPE-LC-MS/MS). The method was fully validated with affording method detection and quantification limits ranging from 0.03 to 1 ng g−1 and from 0.09 to 3.3 ng g−1, respectively. This method was applied to investigate the fate of the selected drugs in potting soil irrigated for a long term (60 days) either with water containing the target compounds at a concentration of 200 μg L−1 or with wastewater treatment plant effluent and thus, at real environmental concentrations. All investigated compounds were found to accumulate in soil irrigated with artificially fortified water. The highest accumulation potential was observed for cis-diltiazem followed by methadone and midazolam that presented average concentrations of 1517 ng g−1, 1041 ng g−1, and 962 ng g−1 d.w., respectively. On the contrary, oxcarbazepine (5.8 ng g−1) and sulfamethoxazole (22 ng g−1) were the target drugs presenting the lowest accumulation potential. Only trace levels of ten drugs were measured in soil irrigated with regenerated water (average concentrations between 1.6 and 4.7 ng g−1 d.w.).

Graphical abstract


Pharmaceuticals Soil adsorption Ultrasound extraction Online solid-phase extraction Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Reclaimed water 



The authors thank the Water Challenges for a Changing World Joint Programming Initiative, and the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO). The EU is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Funding information

This study has been financially supported by the EU through the WaterJPI-2015 AWARE project (PCIN-2017-067) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (Consolidated Research Group “2017 SGR 01404 - Water and Soil Quality Unit”).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1715_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (292 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 291 kb)


  1. 1.
    Vodyanitskii YN, Yakovlev A. Contamination of soils and groundwater with new organic micropollutants: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2016;49(5):560–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferhi S, Bourdat-Deschamps M, Daudin J-J, Houot S, Nélieu S. Factors influencing the extraction of pharmaceuticals from sewage sludge and soil: an experimental design approach. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(22):6153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petrie B, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B. A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water Res. 2015;72:3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter LJ, Garman CD, Ryan J, Dowle A, Bergström E, Thomas-Oates J, et al. Fate and uptake of pharmaceuticals in soil–earthworm systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(10):5955–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li WC. Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil. Environ Pollut. 2014;187:193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monteiro SC, Boxall AB. Occurrence and fate of human pharmaceuticals in the environment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. Springer; 2010. p. 53–154.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao L, Dong YH, Wang H. Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408(5):1069–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durán-Alvarez JC, Becerril-Bravo E, Castro VS, Jiménez B, Gibson R. The analysis of a group of acidic pharmaceuticals, carbamazepine, and potential endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater irrigated soils by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2009;78(3):1159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kümmerer K. The presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to human use–present knowledge and future challenges. J Environ Manag. 2009;90(8):2354–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Redshaw CH, Cooke MP, Talbot HM, McGrath S, Rowland SJ. Low biodegradability of fluoxetine HCl, diazepam and their human metabolites in sewage sludge-amended soil. J Soils Sediments. 2008;8(4):217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aga DS. Fate of pharmaceuticals in the environment and in water treatment systems. CRC Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinney CA, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD, Burkhardt MR, Werner SL, Cahill JD, et al. Survey of organic wastewater contaminants in biosolids destined for land application. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(23):7207–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jjemba PK. Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006;63(1):113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boxall AB, Sinclair CJ, Fenner K, Kolpin D, Maund SJ. Peer reviewed: when synthetic chemicals degrade in the environment. ACS Publications; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuster M, de Alda MJL, Barcelo D. Analysis and distribution of estrogens and progestogens in sewage sludge, soils and sediments. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23(10–11):790–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golet EM, Xifra I, Siegrist H, Alder AC, Giger W. Environmental exposure assessment of fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents from sewage to soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(15):3243–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar K, Gupta SC, Chander Y, Singh AK. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Adv Agron. 2005;87:1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sallach JB, Zhang Y, Hodges L, Snow D, Li X, Bartelt-Hunt S. Concomitant uptake of antimicrobials and Salmonella in soil and into lettuce following wastewater irrigation. Environ Pollut. 2015;197:269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Resistance WA. Fact sheet N 194. Updated April. 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyer E, Gastmeier P, Deja M, Schwab F. Antibiotic consumption and resistance: data from Europe and Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303(6–7):388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montemurro N, Postigo C, Lonigro A, Perez S, Barceló D. Development and validation of an analytical method based on liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry detection for the simultaneous determination of 13 relevant wastewater-derived contaminants in lettuce. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(23):5375–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prosser R, Sibley P. Human health risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in plant tissue due to biosolids and manure amendments, and wastewater irrigation. Environ Int. 2015;75:223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carter LJ, Harris E, Williams M, Ryan JJ, Kookana RS, Boxall AB. Fate and uptake of pharmaceuticals in soil–plant systems. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(4):816–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu C, Spongberg AL, Witter JD, Sridhar BM. Transfer of wastewater associated pharmaceuticals and personal care products to crop plants from biosolids treated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;85:104–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shenker M, Harush D, Ben-Ari J, Chefetz B. Uptake of carbamazepine by cucumber plants–a case study related to irrigation with reclaimed wastewater. Chemosphere. 2011;82(6):905–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dolliver H, Kumar K, Gupta S. Sulfamethazine uptake by plants from manure-amended soil. J Environ Qual. 2007;36(4):1224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boxall AB, Johnson P, Smith EJ, Sinclair CJ, Stutt E, Levy LS. Uptake of veterinary medicines from soils into plants. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(6):2288–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Picó Y, Alvarez-Ruiz R, Alfarhan AH, El-Sheikh MA, Alobaid SM, Barceló D. Uptake and accumulation of emerging contaminants in soil and plant treated with wastewater under real-world environmental conditions in the Al Hayer area (Saudi Arabia). Sci Total Environ. 2019;652:562–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Łukaszewicz P, Białk-Bielińska A, Dołżonek J, Kumirska J, Caban M, Stepnowski P. A new approach for the extraction of tetracyclines from soil matrices: application of the microwave-extraction technique. Analy Bioanal Chem. 2018;1–11.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Azzouz A, Ballesteros E. Combined microwave-assisted extraction and continuous solid-phase extraction prior to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry determination of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and hormones in soils, sediments and sludge. Sci Total Environ. 2012;419:208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Biel-Maeso M, Corada-Fernández C, Lara-Martín PA. Determining the distribution of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in soils and sediments by pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). Chemosphere. 2017;185:1001–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vazquez-Roig P, Segarra R, Blasco C, Andreu V, Picó Y. Determination of pharmaceuticals in soils and sediments by pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(16):2471–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barron L, Tobin J, Paull B. Multi-residue determination of pharmaceuticals in sludge and sludge enriched soils using pressurized liquid extraction, solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J Environ Monit. 2008;10(3):353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jelić A, Petrović M, Barceló D. Multi-residue method for trace level determination of pharmaceuticals in solid samples using pressurized liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography/quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2009;80(1):363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bragança I, Plácido A, Paíga P, Domingues VF, Delerue-Matos C. QuEChERS: a new sample preparation approach for the determination of ibuprofen and its metabolites in soils. Sci Total Environ. 2012;433:281–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    De Carlo RM, Rivoira L, Ciofi L, Ancillotti C, Checchini L, Del Bubba M, et al. Evaluation of different QuEChERS procedures for the recovery of selected drugs and herbicides from soil using LC coupled with UV and pulsed amperometry for their detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407(4):1217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Albero B, Sánchez-Brunete C, García-Valcárcel AI, Pérez RA, Tadeo JL. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of emerging contaminants from environmental samples. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2015;71:110–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pico Y. Ultrasound-assisted extraction for food and environmental samples. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2013;43:84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hao C, Zhao X, Yang P. GC-MS and HPLC-MS analysis of bioactive pharmaceuticals and personal-care products in environmental matrices. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2007;26(6):569–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nödler K, Hillebrand O, Idzik K, Strathmann M, Schiperski F, Zirlewagen J, et al. Occurrence and fate of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist transformation product valsartan acid in the water cycle–a comparative study with selected β-blockers and the persistent anthropogenic wastewater indicators carbamazepine and acesulfame. Water Res. 2013;47(17):6650–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Italian official methods of soil chemical analysis, Italian official methods of soil chemical analysis. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana SoN, 21/10/1999.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matuszewski B, Constanzer M, Chavez-Eng C. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC−MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003;75(13):3019–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bruzzoniti MC, Checchini L, De Carlo RM, Orlandini S, Rivoira L, Del Bubba M. QuEChERS sample preparation for the determination of pesticides and other organic residues in environmental matrices: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(17):4089–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Berlioz-Barbier A, Vauchez A, Wiest L, Baudot R, Vulliet E, Cren-Olivé C. Multi-residue analysis of emerging pollutants in sediment using QuEChERS-based extraction followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(4):1259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Golovko O, Koba O, Kodesova R, Fedorova G, Kumar V, Grabic R. Development of fast and robust multiresidual LC-MS/MS method for determination of pharmaceuticals in soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(14):14068–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu C, Spongberg AL, Witter JD, Fang M, Ames A, Czajkowski KP. Detection of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in agricultural soils receiving biosolids application. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2010;38(3):230–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Handreck KA, Black ND. Growing media for ornamental plants and turf. UNSW press; 2002.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bunt B. Media and mixes for container-grown plants: a manual on the preparation and use of growing media for pot plants. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Antignac J-P, Le Bizec B, Monteau F, Andre F. Validation of analytical methods based on mass spectrometric detection according to the “2002/657/EC” European decision: guideline and application. Anal Chim Acta. 2003;483(1–2):325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ChemistryInstitute for Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.UMR HydroSciences 5569, IRDMontpellier UniversityMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations