Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 12, pp 2663–2674 | Cite as

Mixed organic ligand-based colorimetric and ratiometric chemosensors for Co2+: structure–activity relationships

  • Jing WangEmail author
  • Jing Liang
  • Xu Liu
  • Han Xiao
  • Bin Lan
  • Hai-Bo LiuEmail author
Research Paper
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, chemosensors based on mixed ligands were proposed for the cooperative detection of Co2+. The relationship between the specifically selected mixed organic ligands and the detection activities is discussed. Diverse responses to metal ions can be tuned by controlling the structural features of organic ligands, such as different sizes, geometries, substituents, and connectivity. Among the nine investigated systems, DHAB–Tpy, DHAB–Phen, and DHAB–Dpa displayed high selectivity and sensitivity for Co2+, with detection limits of 4.5 × 10−7 M, 1.1 × 10−7 M, and 8.0 × 10−8 M, respectively. The detection of Co2+ was not affected by other metal ions, anions, amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids, lipids and pH conditions. Furthermore, the proposed method was validated in the analysis of Co2+ in real water samples with satisfactory recovery and relative standard deviation values. TAC–Phen and TAC–Dpa could recognize Co2+ qualitatively, but could not detect Co2+ quantitatively. While TAC–Tpy, PAN–Tpy, PAN–Phen, and PAN–Dpa showed no metal ion selectivity. The experimental results were also rationalized by theoretical studies. A mixed ligand system can be used to produce a ratiometric absorption signal to avoid most ambiguities, such as the chemosensor environment and concentration, via self-calibration of two absorption bands. Structural insights derived from detection activities can provide valuable information for the design of new metal ion chemosensors by varying the type of organic ligands.

Graphical abstracts

The work represents a simple strategy for obtaining synthesis-free, inexpensive, and sensitivity-tunable chemosensors through mixing organic ligands of different sizes, substitutions, geometries, and connectivity to modulate the sensing behaviors.

Keywords

Chemosensor Mixed ligands Cooperative detection Structural features Ratiometric detection Theoretical studies 

Notes

Funding information

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the NSFC (Grant Nos. 21567002, 31560014) and Hundred-Talent Program (Guangxi Province).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1707_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 2.18 mb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cheng J, Zhou X, Xiang H. Fluorescent metal ion chemosensors via cation exchange reactions of complexes, quantum dots, and metal–organic frameworks. Analyst. 2015;140:7082–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li X, Gao X, Shi W, Ma H. Design strategies for water-soluble small molecular chromogenic and fluorogenic probes. Chem Rev. 2014;114:590–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang J, Liu HB, Tong Z, Ha CS. Fluorescent/luminescent detection of natural amino acids by organometallic systems. Coord Chem Rev. 2015;303:139–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, He W, Guo Z. Metal coordination in photoluminescent sensing. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:1568–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chhatwal M, Kumar A, Singh V, Gupta RD, Awasthi SK. Addressing of multiple-metal ions on a single platform. Coord Chem Rev. 2015;292:30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bencini A, Lippolis V. 1,10-Phenanthroline: a versatile building block for the construction of ligands for various purposes. Coord Chem Rev. 2010;254:2096–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang J, Ha CS. A colorimetric and fluorescent turn-on chemosensor for Zn2+ based on an azobenzene-containing compound. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:6959–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen Y, Jiang J. Porphyrin-based multi-signal chemosensors for Pb2+ and Cu2+. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:4782–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee HJ, Cho CW, Seo H, Singha S, Jun YW, Lee KH, et al. A two-photon fluorescent probe for lysosomal zinc ions. Chem Commun. 2016;52:124–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anzenbacher P, Jursíková K, Sessler JL. Second generation calixpyrrole anion sensors. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:9350–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ru J, Chen X, Guan L, Tang X, Wang C, Meng Y, et al. Ratiometric iridium (III) complex-based phosphorescent chemodosimeter for Hg2+ applicable in time-resolved luminescence assay and live cell imaging. Anal Chem. 2015;87:3255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bozdemir OA, Guliyev R, Buyukcakir O, Selcuk S, Kolemen S, Gulseren G, et al. Selective manipulation of ICT and PET processes in styryl-bodipy derivatives: applications in molecular logic and fluorescence sensing of metal ions. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8029–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du J, Huang Z, Yu XQ, Pu L. Highly selective fluorescent recognition of histidine by a crown ether–terpyridine–Zn (II) sensor. Chem Commun. 2013;49:5399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu Z, Jia X, Bian P, Ma Z. A simple and novel system for colorimetric detection of cobalt ions. Analyst. 2014a;139:585–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu HB, Zhao HY, Tong Z, Zhang Y, Lan B, Wang J. A colorimetric, ratiometric, and fluorescent cobalt (II) chemosensor based on mixed organic ligands. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017;239:511–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding Y, Zhu WH, Xie Y. Development of ion chemosensors based on porphyrin analogues. Chem Rev. 2017;117:2203–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fermi A, Bergamini G, Roy M, Gingras M, Ceroni P. Turn-on phosphorescence by metal coordination to a multivalent terpyridine ligand: a new paradigm for luminescent sensors. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:6395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alreja P, Kaur N. Recent advances in 1,10-phenanthroline ligands for chemosensing of cations and anions. RSC Adv. 2016;6:23169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu Z, Baek KH, Kim HN, Cui J, Qian X, Spring DR, et al. Zn2+-triggered amide tautomerization produces a highly Zn2+-selective, cell-permeable, and ratiometric fluorescent sensor. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:601–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Y, Fei Q, Shan H, Cui M, Liu Q, Feng G, et al. A novel fluorescent ‘off-on-off’ probe for relay recognition of Zn2+ and Cu2+ derived from N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine. Analyst. 2014b;139:1868–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakamoto R, Iwashima T, Kögel JF, Kusaka S, Tsuchiya M, Kitagawa Y, et al. Dissymmetric bis (dipyrrinato) zinc (II) complexes: rich variety and bright red to near-infrared luminescence with a large pseudo-stokes shift. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:5666–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shellaiah M, Simon T, Srinivasadesikan V, Lin CM, Sun KW, Ko FH, et al. Novel pyrene containing monomeric and dimeric supramolecular AIEE active nano-probes utilized in selective “off–on” trivalent metal and highly acidic pH sensing with live cell applications. J Mater Chem C. 2016;4:2056–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shellaiah M, Rajan YC, Balu P, Murugan A. A pyrene based Schiff base probe for selective fluorescence turn-on detection of Hg2+ ions with live cell application. New J Chem. 2015;39:2523–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringGuangxi UniversityNanningChina

Personalised recommendations