Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 11, pp 2415–2424 | Cite as

Flow injection tyrosinase biosensor for direct determination of acetaminophen in human urine

  • Arbër Frangu
  • Kateřina Pravcová
  • Petra Šilarová
  • Tahir Arbneshi
  • Milan SýsEmail author
Research Paper
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

An amperometric biosensor compatible with a flow injection analysis (FIA) for highly selective determination of acetaminophen (APAP) in a sample of human urine was developed. This biosensor is also suitable for use in the routine pharmaceutical practice. To prove this statement, two different commercially available pharmaceutical formulations were analyzed. This nano-(bio)electroanalytical device was made from a commercially available screen-printed carbon electrode covered by a thin layer of non-functionalized graphene (NFG) as amperometric transducer. A biorecognition layer was prepared from mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) tyrosinase (EC 1.14.18.1) cross-linked using glutaraldehyde, where resulting aggregates were covered by Nafion®, a known ion exchange membrane. Owing to the use of tyrosinase and presence of NFG, the developed analytical instrument is able to measure even at potentials of 0 V. Linear ranges differ according to choice of detection potential, namely up to 130 μmol L−1 at 0 V, up to 90 μmol L−1 at −0.1 V, and up to 70 μmol L−1 at −0.15 V. The first mentioned linear range is described by the equation Ip [μA] = 0.236 − 0.1984c [μmol L−1] and correlation coefficient r = 0.9987; this equation was used to quantify the content of APAP in each sample. The limit of detection of APAP was estimated to be 1.1 μmol L−1. A recovery of 96.8% (c = 25 μmol L−1, n = 5 measurements) was calculated. The obtained results show that FIA is a very selective method for APAP determination, being comparable to the chosen reference method of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Keywords

Acetaminophen Amperometry Biosensor Flow injection analysis Tyrosinase Human urine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice (project No. SGS-2019-003) and CEEPUS CIII-CZ-0212-10-1617 network for mobility funding are gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consent

The study was not aiming to investigate functions/diseases of the human body or a process of medical treatment; therefore, the administration of acetaminophen by the participant was not performed and the drug was used only for artificial spiking of commercial and the participant’s own urine sample. A healthy volunteer received a complete description of the study and gave written informed consent before providing the urine samples. The obtained sample of human urine was anonymized before the study. The ethical principles for medical research of the components of human beings have not been violated because no compounds other than acetaminophen (artificially enriched urine) were determined. Therefore, all experiments with human urine samples were done in accordance with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki, June 1964.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1687_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (668 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 668 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ivey KJ, Settree P. Effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on gastric ionic fluxes and potential difference in man. Gut. 1976;17(11):916–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clissold SP. Paracetamol and phenacetin. Drugs. 1986;32(4):46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodis J. New facts about paracetamol, risks of overdose, intoxication and their management. Practical Pharm. 2015;11(3):90–2.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lancaster EM, Hiatt JR, Zarrinpar A. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: an updated review. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89:193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myers RP, Li B, Fong A, Shaheen AA, Quan H. Hospitalizations for acetaminophen overdose: a Canadian population-based study from 1995 to 2004. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Björnsson ES. Drug-induced liver injury: an overview over the most critical compounds. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89:327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luque de Castro MD, Valcárcel M. Flow injection analysis of pharmaceuticals. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1989;7(12):1291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mičová K, Friedecký D, Faber E, Polýnková A, Adam T. Flow injection analysis vs ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry for determination of imatinib in human plasma. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411(23-24):1957–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luque de Castro MD, Cases MV. Simultaneous determinations in flow injection analysis. A review. Analyst. 1984;109(4):413–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Y, Chen SM. The electrochemical properties of acetaminophen on bare glassy carbon electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:2175–87.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaughan PA, Scott LDL, McAller JF. Anal Chim Acta. 1991;248(2):361–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilmartin MAT, Hart JP. Rapid detection of paracetamol using a disposable, surface-modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Analyst. 1994;119(11):2431–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fatibello-Filho O, Lupetti KO, Vieira IC. Chronoamperometric determination of paracetamol using an avocado tissue (Persea americana) biosensor. Talanta. 2001;55(4):685–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia LF, Benjamin SR, Antunes RS, Lopes FM, Somerset VS, Gil ES. Solanum melongena polyphenol oxidase biosensor for the electrochemical analysis of paracetamol. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;46(8):850–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    González-Sánchez MI, Rubio-Retama J, López-Cabarcos E, Valero E. Development of an acetaminophen amperometric biosensor based on peroxidase entrapped in polyacrylamide microgels. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26(5):1883–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maghear A, Cristea C, Marian A, Marian IO, Sandulescu R. A novel biosensor for acetaminophen detection with Romanian clays and conductive polymeric films. Farmacia. 2013;61:1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tertis M, Florea A, Sandulescu R, Cristea C. Carbon based electrodes modified with horseradish peroxidase immobilized in conducting polymers for acetaminophen analysis. Sensors. 2013;13:4841–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valero E, Varón R, García-Carmona F. Catalytic oxidation of acetaminophen by tyrosinase in the presence of l-proline: a kinetic study. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;416(2):218–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rolff M, Schottenheim J, Decker H, Tuczek F. Copper–O2 reactivity of tyrosinase models towards external monophenolic substrates: molecular mechanism and comparison with the enzyme. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(7):4077–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valero E, Varón R, García-Carmona F. Tyrosinase-mediated oxidation of acetaminophen to 4-acetamido-o-benzoquinone. Biol Chem. 2002;383(12):1931–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calas-Blanchard C, Istamboulié G, Bontoux M, Plantard G, Goetz V, Noguer T. Biosensor-based real-time monitoring of paracetamol photocatalytic degradation. Chemosphere. 2015;131:124–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mukaddam M, Litwiller E, Pinnau I. Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in Nafion. Macromolecules. 2016;49(1):280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rocchitta G, Spanu A, Babudieri S, Latte G, Madeddu G, Galleri G, et al. Enzyme biosensors for biomedical applications: strategies for safeguarding analytical performances in biological fluids. Sensors. 2016;16(6):780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Albareda-Sirvent M, Merkoçi A, Alegret S. Configurations used in the design of screen-printed enzymatic biosensors. A review. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2000;69(1-2):153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shao Y, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y. Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis. 2010;22(10):1027–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin Y, Yantasee W, Wang J. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the development of electrochemical biosensors. Front Biosci. 2005;10:492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baranowska I, Wilczek A. Simultaneous RP-HPLC determination of sotalol, metoprolol, alpha-hydroxymetoprolol, paracetamol and its glucuronide and sulfate metabolites in human urine. Anal Sci. 2009;25(6):769–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abu-Qare AW, Abou-Donia MB. A validated HPLC method for the determination of pyridostigmine bromide, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine in rat plasma and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001;26(5-6):939–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vandeput M, Patris S, Silva H, Parsajoo C, Dejaeghere B, Martinez JA, et al. Application of a tyrosinase microreactor – detector in a flow injection configuration for the determination of affinity and dynamics of inhibitor binding. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017;248:385–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    He Y, Cussler EL. Ammonia permeabilities of perfluorosulfonic membranes in various ionic forms. J Membr Sci. 1992;68:43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Birch ME, Ruda-Eberenz TA, Chai M, Andrews R, Hatfield RL. Properties that influence the specific surface areas of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(9):1148–66.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brownson DA, Foster CW, Banks CE. The electrochemical performance of graphene modified electrodes: an analytical perspective. Analyst. 2012;137(8):1815–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sýs M, Žabčíková S, Červenka L, Vytřas K. Comparison of adsorptive with extractive stripping voltammetry in electrochemical determination of retinol. Potr S J F Sci. 2017;11(1):96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater. 2010;22:3906–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheldon RA. Characteristic features and biotechnological applications of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gil ES, Cout RO. Flavonoid electrochemistry: a review on the electroanalytical applications. Rev Bras. 2013;23:542–58.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Duckworth HW, Coleman JE. Physicochemical and kinetic properties of mushroom tyrosinase. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:1613–25.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Solná R, Skládal P. Amperometric flow injection determination of phenolic compounds using a biosensor with immobilized laccase, peroxidase and tyrosinase. Electroanalysis. 2005;23:2137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sýs M, Pekec B, Kalcher K, Vytřas K. Amperometric enzyme carbon paste-based biosensor for quantification of hydroquinone and polyphenolic antioxidant capacity. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8:9030–40.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gorton L. Carbon paste electrodes modified with enzymes, tissues, and cells. Electroanalysis. 1995;7(1):23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Calvo EJ, Danilowicz C. Amperometric enzyme electrodes. J Braz Chem Soc. 1997;8(1):563–74.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Santos AM, Vicentini FC, Deroco PB, Rocha-Filho RC, Fatibello-Filho O. Square-wave voltammetric determination of paracetamol and codeine in pharmaceutical and human body fluid samples using a cathodically pretreated boron-doped diamond electrode. J Braz Chem Soc. 2015;26(10):2159–68.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lourenção BC, Medeiros RA, Rocha-Filho RC, Mazo LH, Fatibello-Filho O. Simultaneous voltammetric determination of paracetamol and caffeine in pharmaceutical formulations using a boron-doped diamond electrode. Talanta. 2009;78(3):748–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Babaei A, Khalilzadeh B, Afrasiabi M. A new sensor for the simultaneous determination of paracetamol and mefenamic acid in a pharmaceutical preparation and biological samples using copper(II) doped zeolite modified carbon paste electrode. J Appl Electrochem. 2010;40(8):1537–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of PrishtinaPrishtinaRepublic of Kosovo
  2. 2.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical TechnologyUniversity of PardubicePardubiceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations