The Marquis test is the most frequently used spot color assay for the screening of unknown drugs such as amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, 3,4-metilenedioxymethamphetamine, and morphine. However, this test involves the use of the toxic reagent formaldehyde, as well as the manipulation of concentrated sulfuric acid. Here, we report a new format of this test that improves the sustainability and safety for the operator by immobilizing formaldehyde into a polydimetylsiloxane composite. In contact with a solution (or suspension) of the suspected sample in sulfuric acid, the dispositive delivers formaldehyde and the reaction takes place in a few seconds. Under the proposed conditions, only small amounts of the drug (μg) are necessary to produce intense changes of color. In addition, the percentage of the drug in the sample can be established by obtaining pictures of the test vials and subsequent analysis of the digitalized images. The responses were linear for amphetamine-like drugs up to a concentration of 100 mg L−1, and the precision achieved was adequate (relative standard deviations, RSDs < 10%). The developed composites were tested for the determination of MDMA in several drug street samples, and a good correlation with the results obtained by a reference method based on liquid chromatography was found. The main advantages of the proposed approach over the traditional Marquis test format are better portability and safety for the operator at a lower cost and the possibility of using it for quantitative analysis.
Polydimethylsiloxane Digital images colorimetry Harm reduction Drug street samples In situ analysis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are grateful to EU FEDER and the Spanish AEI (CTQ2017-90082-P) and the Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO 2016/109) for the financial support received. N. J.-M. expresses her gratitude to the European Commission through the LIFE programme (LIFE-LIBERNITRATE 16 ENV/ES/000419) for her funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (UNODC). World Drug Report. Viena: UNODC; 2017.Google Scholar
Harper L, Powell J, Pijl EM. An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services. Harm Reduct J. 2017;14:52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capitán-Vallvey LF, López-Ruiz N, Martínez-Olmos A, Erenas MM, Palma AJ. Recent developments in computer vision-based analytical chemistry: a tutorial review. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;899:23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choodum A, Daeid NN. Rapid and semi-quantitative presumptive test for opiates drug. Talanta. 2011;86:284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choodum A, Daeid NN. Digital image-based colourimetric tests for amphetamine and methylamphetamine. Drug Test Anal. 2011;3:277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musile G, Wang L, Bottoms J, Tagliaro F, McCord B. The development of paper microfluidic devices for presumptive drug detection. Anal Methods. 2015;7:8025–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velapoldi RA, Wicks SA. The use of chemical spot tests kits for the presumptive identification of narcotics and drugs of abuse. J Forensic Sci. 1974;19:636–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neal CK, Crouch DJ, Fatah AA. Validation of twelve chemical spot tests for the detection of drugs of abuse. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;109:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choodum A, Kanatharana P, Wongniramaikul W, NicDaeid N. A sol–gel colorimetric sensor for methamphetamine detection. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2015;215:553–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argente-García A, Jornet-Martínez N, Herráez-Hernández R, Campíns-Falcó P. A solid colorimetric sensor for the analysis of amphetamine-like street samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;943:123–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argente-García A, Jornet-Martínez N, Herráez-Hernández R, Campíns-Falcó P. A passive solid sensor for in-situ colorimetric estimation of the presence of ketamine in illicit drug samples. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;253:1137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jornet-Martínez N, Gómez-Ojea R, Tomás-Huercio O, Herráez-Hernández R, Campíns-Falcó P. Colorimetric determination of alcohols in spirit drinks using a reversible solid sensor. Food Control. 2018;94:7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu N, Feng L, Tan Y, Hu J. An optical reflected device using a molecular imprinted polymer film sensor. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;653:103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okachi T, Onaka M. Formaldehyde encapsulated in zeolite: a long-lived, highly activated one-carbon electrophile to carbonyl-ene reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:2306–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiba N, Sun L, Yokose S, Kazue MT, Suzuki TT. Determination of nano-molar levels of formaldehyde in drinking water using flow-injection system with immobilized formaldehyde dehydrogenase after off-line solid-phase extraction. Anal Chim Acta. 1999;378:169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herráez-Hernández R, Campíns-Falcó P, Verdú-Andrés J. Sensitive determination of methylenedioxylated amphetamines by liquid chromatography. Analyst. 2001;126:581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jornet-Martínez N, Moliner-Martínez Y, Herráez-Hernández H, Molins-Legua C, Verdú-Andrés J, Campíns-Falcó P. Designing solid optical sensors for in situ passive discrimination of volatile amines based on a new one-step hydrophilic PDMS preparation. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;223:333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations International Drug Control Program. Rapid testing methods of drug of abuse: manual for the use by national law enforcement and narcotics laboratory personnel. Vienna: United Nations; 1994.Google Scholar