Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 10, pp 2111–2119 | Cite as

Label-free evaluation of small-molecule–protein interaction using magnetic capture and electrochemical detection

  • Carolina V. Uliana
  • Tássia R. de Oliveira
  • Márcia R. Cominetti
  • Ronaldo C. FariaEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

The evaluation of interaction between small molecules and protein is an important step in the discovery of new drugs and to study complex biological systems. In this work, an alternative method was presented to evaluate small-molecule–protein interaction by using ligand capture by protein-coated magnetic particles (MPs) and disposable electrochemical cells. The interaction study was conducted using [10]-gingerol from ginger rhizome and a transmembrane protein αVβ3 integrin. Initially, the electrochemical behavior of the natural compound [10]-gingerol was evaluated with the disposable carbon-based electrodes and presented an irreversible oxidation process controlled by diffusion. The analytical curve for [10]-gingerol was obtained in the range of 1.0 to 20.0 μmol L−1, with limit of detection of 0.26 μmol L−1. Then MPs coated with αVβ3 integrin were incubated with standard solutions and extracts of ginger rhizome for [10]-gingerol capture and separation. The bioconjugate obtained was dropped to the disposable electrochemical cells, keeping a permanent magnet behind the working electrode, and the binding process was evaluated by the electrochemical detection of [10]-gingerol. The assay method proposed was also employed to calculate the [10]-gingerol–αVβ3 integrin association constant, which was calculated as 4.3 × 107 M−1. The method proposed proved to be a good label-free alternative to ligand–protein interaction studies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ligand–protein binding assay Small-molecule–protein binding Magnetic capture Affinity constant 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, No. 150569/2016-5), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, No. 2015/19890-1, No. 2014/22401-0, and No. 2015/24940-8), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, No. 01).

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1636_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (462 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 462 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    McFedries A, Schwaid A, Saghatelian A. Methods for the elucidation of protein-small molecule interactions. Chem Biol. 2013;20:667–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.04.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li X, Wang X, Snyder M. Systematic investigation of protein-small molecule interactions. IUBMB Life. 2013;65:2–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pei H, Zuo X, Zhu D, Huang Q, Fan C. Functional DNA nanostructures for theranostic applications. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:550–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400195t.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schenkman JB, Jansson I, Lvov Y, Rusling JF, Boussaad S, Tao NJ. Charge-dependent sidedness of cytochrome P450 forms studied by quartz crystal microbalance and atomic force microscopy. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;385:78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.2000.2140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pei H, Lu N, Wen Y, Song S, Liu Y, Yan H, et al. A DNA nanostructure-based biomolecular probe carrier platform for electrochemical biosensing. Adv Mater. 2010;22:4754–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201002767.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pei H, Wan Y, Li J, Hu H, Su Y, Huang Q, et al. Regenerable electrochemical immunological sensing at DNA nanostructure-decorated gold surfaces. Chem Commun. 2011;47:6254.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc11660f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humphries JD, Byron A, Humphries MJ. Integrin ligands at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:3901 LP-3903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh DA. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2748.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beer AJ, Kessler H, Wester H-J, Schwaiger M. PET imaging of integrin αVβ3 expression. Theranostics. 2011;1:48–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis PJ, Glinsky GV, Lin HY, Leith JT, Hercbergs A, Tang HY, et al. Cancer cell gene expression modulated from plasma membrane integrin αvβ3 by thyroid hormone and nanoparticulate tetrac. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:240.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin H-Y, Lansing L, Merillon J-M, Davis FB, Tang H-Y, Shih A, et al. Integrin alphaVbeta3 contains a receptor site for resveratrol. FASEB J. 2006;20:1742–4.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-5743fje.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Belleri M, Ribatti D, Savio M, Stivala LA, Forti L, Tanghetti E, et al. alphavbeta3 integrin-dependent antiangiogenic activity of resveratrol stereoisomers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:3761–70.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim HI, Huang H, Cheepala S, Huang S, Chung J. Curcumin inhibition of integrin ( 6 4)-dependent breast cancer cell motility and invasion. Cancer Prev Res. 2008;1:385–91.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis PJ, Mousa SA, Cody V, Tang H-Y, Lin H-Y. Small molecule hormone or hormone-like ligands of integrin αVβ3: implications for cancer cell behavior. Horm Cancer. 2013;4:335–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-013-0156-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang GX, Li X, Snyder M. Investigating metabolite-protein interactions: an overview of available techniques. Methods. 2012;57:459–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.06.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Terstappen GC, Schlüpen C, Raggiaschi R, Gaviraghi G. Target deconvolution strategies in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:891–903.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myszka DG. Analysis of small-molecule interactions using Biacore S51 technology. Anal Biochem. 2004;329:316–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.03.028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cooper DR, Porebski PJ, Chruszcz M, Minor W. X-ray crystallography: assessment and validation of protein-small molecule complexes for drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2011;6:771–82.  https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2011.585154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krell T, Lacal J, García-Fontana C, Silva-Jiménez H, Rico-Jiménez M, Lugo AC, Darias JAR, Ramos J-L. Characterization of molecular interactions using isothermal titration calorimetry. In: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). 2014; pp 193–203.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Afsahi S, Lerner MB, Goldstein JM, Lee J, Tang X, Bagarozzi DA, et al. Novel graphene-based biosensor for early detection of Zika virus infection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;100:85–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOS.2017.08.051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gault J, Donlan JAC, Liko I, Hopper JTS, Gupta K, Housden NG, et al. High-resolution mass spectrometry of small molecules bound to membrane proteins. Nat Methods. 2016;13:333–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3771.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hernández-Hernández AA, Álvarez-Romero GA, Contreras-López E, Aguilar-Arteaga K, Castañeda-Ovando A. Food analysis by microextraction methods based on the use of magnetic nanoparticles as supports: recent advances. Food Anal Methods. 2017;10:2974–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Oliveira RAG, Materon EM, Melendez ME, Carvalho AL, Faria RC. Disposable microfluidic Immunoarray device for sensitive breast cancer biomarker detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:27433–40.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b03350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Modh H, Scheper T, Walter J-G. Aptamer-modified magnetic beads in biosensing. Sensors. 2018;18:1041.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uliana CV, Peverari CR, Afonso AS, Cominetti MR, Faria RC. Fully disposable microfluidic electrochemical device for detection of estrogen receptor alpha breast cancer biomarker. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;99:156–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marszałł MP, Buciński A. A protein-coated magnetic beads as a tool for the rapid drug-protein binding study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52:420–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2009.06.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yasuda M, Wilson DR, Fugmann SD, Moaddel R. Synthesis and characterization of SIRT6 protein coated magnetic beads: identification of a novel inhibitor of SIRT6 deacetylase from medicinal plant extracts. Anal Chem. 2011;83:7400–7.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac201403y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ji L, Wu J-H, Luo Q, Li X, Zheng W, Zhai G, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry combined with separation and enrichment of phosphopeptides by titania coated magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres for screening of protein kinase inhibitors. Anal Chem. 2012;84:2284–91.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202897u.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu Y, Wang E. Electrochemical biosensors based on magnetic micro/nano particles. Electrochim Acta. 2012;84:62–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zeidan N, Su H, Aitken M, Gunning PT, Kerman K. Magnetic bead-based electrochemical detection of interaction between epigallocatechin-3-gallate and STAT proteins. Anal Methods. 2015;7:3566–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY00169B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Joo J-H, Hong S-S, Cho Y-R, Seo D-W. 10-Gingerol inhibits proliferation and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through suppression of Akt and p38MAPK activity. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:779–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    da Silva JA, Becceneri AB, Mutti HS, Martin ACBM, Silva MF das GF, Fernandes JB, et al. Purification and differential biological effects of ginger-derived substances on normal and tumor cell lines. J Chromatogr B. 2012;903:157–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fuzer AM, Lee S-Y, Mott JD, Cominetti MR. [10]-Gingerol reverts malignant phenotype of breast cancer cells in 3D culture. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118:2693–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martin ACBM, Fuzer AM, Becceneri AB, da Silva JA, Tomasin R, Denoyer D, et al. [10]-gingerol induces apoptosis and inhibits metastatic dissemination of triple negative breast cancer in vivo. Oncotarget. 2017;8:72260–71.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Afonso AS, Uliana CV, Martucci DH, Faria RC. Simple and rapid fabrication of disposable carbon-based electrochemical cells using an electronic craft cutter for sensor and biosensor applications. Talanta. 2016;146:381–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chaisiwamongkhol K, Ngamchuea K, Batchelor-McAuley C, Compton RG. Electrochemical detection and quantification of gingerol species in ginger (Zingiber officinale) using multiwalled carbon nanotube modified electrodes. Analyst. 2016;141:6321–8.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AN02254E.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crespo JG, João G, Böddeker KW Karl W. Membrane processes in separation and purification.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR. Electrochemical methods : fundamentals and applications. Hoboken: Wiley; 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garbellini GS, Rocha-Filho RC, Fatibello-Filho O. Voltammetric determination of ciprofloxacin in urine samples and its interaction with dsDNA on a cathodically pretreated boron-doped diamond electrode. Anal Methods. 2015;7:3411–8.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY00625B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arkin MR, Wells JA. Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:301–17.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kuriyan J, Konforti B, Wemmer D. The molecules of life : physical and chemical principles. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2013.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vachali PP, Li B, Bartschi A. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based biosensor technology for the quantitative characterization of protein–carotenoid interactions. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;572:66–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ABB.2014.12.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheng XR, Wallace GQ, Lagugné-Labarthet F, Kerman K. Au nanostructured surfaces for electrochemical and localized surface plasmon resonance-based monitoring of α-Synuclein–small molecule interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:4081–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am507972b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhuo R, Liu H, Liu N, Wang Y. Ligand fishing: a remarkable strategy for discovering bioactive compounds from complex mixture of natural products. Molecules. 2016;21:1516.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina V. Uliana
    • 1
  • Tássia R. de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Márcia R. Cominetti
    • 2
  • Ronaldo C. Faria
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryFederal University of São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Department of GerontologyFederal University of São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations