We report the development of a fast and accurate fluorescence-based assay for amidine linked to cellulose membranes and Sepharose gel. The assay is founded on the glyoxal reaction, which involves reaction of an amidine group with glyoxal and an aromatic aldehyde, leading to the formation of a fluorophore that can be analyzed and quantified by fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging. While the assay has been reported previously for aromatic amidine estimation in solution phase, here we describe its adaptation and application to amidine linked to diverse forms of solid matrices, particularly benzamidine Sepharose and benzamidine-linked cellulose membranes. These functionalized porous matrices find important application in purification of serine proteases. The efficacy of a protein separation device is determined by, among other factors, the ligand (amidine) density. Hence, a sensitive and reproducible method for amidine quantitation in solid phase is needed. The glyoxal reaction was carried out on microbead-sized Sepharose gel and cellulose membranes. Calibration curves were developed for each phase, which established linearity in the range of 0–0.45 μmol per mL amidine for free amidine in solution, 0–0.45 μmol amidine per mL Sepharose gel, and 0–0.48 μmol per mL cellulose membrane. The assay showed high accuracy (~ 3.4% error), precision (RSD < 2%), and reproducibility. Finally, we show how this fluorescent labeling (glyoxal) method can provide a tool for imaging membranes and ligand distribution through confocal laser scanning microscopy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This project was supported by the National Science Foundation grant DMR-PREM-1523463. Support was also received from instrumentation facilities created through Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20 GM103475. Additional research infrastructure support and services were provided by the Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Program, from the grant U54MD007600 from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). Ms. Adriana N Santiago Ruiz received research fellowship from NIH-RISE Program at the University of Puerto Rico in Cayey (grant number 5R25GM059429-20) to participate in this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NSF or NIH.
Yang C, Guan Y, Xing J, Liu H. Development of superparamagnetic functional carriers and application for affinity separation of subtilisin Carlsberg. Polymer. 2006;47(7):2299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayramoglu G, Ozalp VC, Altintas B, Arica MY. Preparation and characterization of mixed-mode magnetic adsorbent with p-amino-benzamidine ligand: operated in a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed reactor for purification of trypsin from bovine pancreas. Process Biochem. 2014;49(3):520–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasoli E, Reyes YR, Guzman OM, Rosado A, Cruz VR, Borges A, et al. Para-aminobenzamidine linked regenerated cellulose membranes for plasminogen activator purification: effect of spacer arm length and ligand density. J Chromatogr B. 2013;930:13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi JR, Hu J, Tang R, Gong Y, Feng S, Ren H, et al. An integrated paper-based sample-to-answer biosensor for nucleic acid testing at the point of care. Lab Chip. 2016;16(3):611–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Choi JR, Tang R, Wang S, Abas WABW, Pingguan-Murphy B, Xu F. Based sample-to-answer molecular diagnostic platform for point-of-care diagnostics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:427–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Vicente T, Fáber R, Alves PM, Carrondo MJ, Mota JP. Impact of ligand density on the optimization of ion-exchange membrane chromatography for viral vector purification. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(6):1347–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Nestola P, Villain L, Peixoto C, Martins DL, Alves PM, Carrondo MJ, et al. Impact of grafting on the design of new membrane adsorbers for adenovirus purification. J Biotechnol. 2014;181:1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bhambure R, Gillespie CM, Phillips M, Graalfs H, Lenhoff AM. Ionic strength-dependent changes in tentacular ion exchangers with variable ligand density. I. Structural properties. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1463:90–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Bhambure R, Angelo JM, Gillespie CM, Phillips M, Graalfs H, Lenhoff AM. Ionic strength-dependent changes in tentacular ion exchangers with variable ligand density. II. Functional properties. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1506:55–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Liesienedot J, Račaitytedot K, Morkevičienedot M, Valančius P, Bumelis B. Immobilized metal affinity chromatography of human growth hormone effect of ligand density. J Chromatogr A. 1997;764(1):27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belew M, Porath J. Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography: effect of solute structure, ligand density and salt concentration on the retention of peptides. J Chromatogr A. 1990;516(2):333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogle J, Persson J. Effects of resin ligand density on yield and impurity clearance in preparative cation exchange chromatography. II. Process characterization. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1225:70–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lu HL, Lin DQ, Zhu MM, Yao SJ. Effects of ligand density and pore size on the adsorption of bovine IgG with DEAE ion-exchange resins. J Sep Sci. 2012;35(16):2131–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Healthcare G (2016) Ligand concentration for Benzamidine Sepharose™ 4 Fast Flow.Google Scholar
Evans SA, Olson S, Shore J. p-Aminobenzamidine as a fluorescent probe for the active site of serine proteases. J Biol Chem. 1982;257(6):3014–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Marroquin M, Bruce T, Pellegrino J, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Characterization of asymmetry in microporous membranes by cross-sectional confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Membr Sci. 2011;379(1–2):504–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickramasinghe S, Carlson J, Teske C, Hubbuch J, Ulbricht M. Characterizing solute binding to macroporous ion exchange membrane adsorbers using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Membr Sci. 2006;281(1–2):609–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt C, Töpfer O, Langhoff A, Oppermann W, Schmidt-Naake G. Depth profiling of graft polymer membranes via confocal laser scanning microscopy. Chem Mater. 2007;19(17):4277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder M, Vlachos D, Nikolakis V. Quantitative analysis of membrane morphology, microstructure, and polycrystallinity via laser scanning confocal microscopy: application to NaX zeolite membranes. J Membr Sci. 2007;290(1–2):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang Y-N, Wei J, She Q, Pacheco F, Tang CY. Microscopic characterization of FO/PRO membranes–a comparative study of CLSM, TEM and SEM. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(18):9995–10003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wang J, Dismer F, Hubbuch J, Ulbricht M. Detailed analysis of membrane adsorber pore structure and protein binding by advanced microscopy. J Membr Sci. 2008;320(1–2):456–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert U, Linden T, Belfort G, Kula M-R, Thömmes J. Visualising protein adsorption to ion-exchange membranes by confocal microscopy. J Membr Sci. 2002;199(1–2):161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolte S, Cordelieres F. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc. 2006;224(3):213–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kostinski AB. On the extinction of radiation by a homogeneous but spatially correlated random medium. JOSA A. 2001;18(8):1929–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2002.Google Scholar
Čapek M, Janáček J, Kubínová L. Methods for compensation of the light attenuation with depth of images captured by a confocal microscope. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69(8):624–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Schmid B, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Longair M, Heisenberg M. A high-level 3D visualization API for Java and ImageJ. BMC Bioinf. 2010;11(1):274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, Arena ET, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinf. 2017;18(1):529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar