In vitro metabolic fate of nine LSD-based new psychoactive substances and their analytical detectability in different urinary screening procedures
The market of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is characterized by a high turnover and thus provides several challenges for analytical toxicology. The analysis of urine samples often requires detailed knowledge about metabolism given that parent compounds either may be present only in small amounts or may not even be excreted. Hence, knowledge of the metabolism of NPS is a prerequisite for the development of reliable analytical methods. The main aim of this work was to elucidate for the first time the pooled human liver S9 fraction metabolism of the nine d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) derivatives 1-acetyl-LSD (ALD-52), 1-propionyl-LSD (1P-LSD), 1-butyryl-LSD (1B-LSD), N6-ethyl-nor-LSD (ETH-LAD), 1-propionyl-N6-ethyl-nor-LSD (1P-ETH-LAD), N6-allyl-nor-LSD (AL-LAD), N-ethyl-N-cyclopropyl lysergamide (ECPLA), (2′S,4′S)-lysergic acid 2,4-dimethylazetidide (LSZ), and lysergic acid morpholide (LSM-775) by means of liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Identification of the monooxygenase enzymes involved in the initial metabolic steps was performed using recombinant human enzymes and their contribution confirmed by inhibition experiments. Overall, N-dealkylation and hydroxylation, as well as combinations of these steps predominantly catalyzed by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, were found. For ALD-52, 1P-LSD, and 1B-LSD, deacylation to LSD was observed. The obtained mass spectral data of all metabolites are essential for reliable analytical detection particularly in urinalysis and for differentiation of the LSD-like compounds as biotransformations also led to structurally identical metabolites. However, in urine of rats after the administration of expected recreational doses and using standard urine screening approaches, parent drugs or metabolites could not be detected.
KeywordsLysergamides NPS Metabolism Urinalysis LC-HRMS/MS
The authors would like to thank Armin A. Weber and the Stiftelsen för Klinisk farmakologi & farmakoterapi for support.
Compliance with ethical standards
The studies have been approved by an ethics committee (Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz, Saarbrücken, Germany).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Stevens J. Storming heaven: LSD and the American dream. New York: Grove Press; 1987.Google Scholar
- 7.Shulgin A, Shulgin A. Tihkal: the continuation. Berkeley: Transform Press; 1997.Google Scholar
- 9.Nichols DE. LSD and its lysergamide cousins. Heffter Rev Psychedelic Res. 2001;2:80–7.Google Scholar
- 15.Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Elliott SP, Wallach J, Colestock T, et al. Return of the lysergamides. Part II: analytical and behavioural characterization of N(6) -allyl-6-norlysergic acid diethylamide (AL-LAD) and (2'S,4'S)-lysergic acid 2,4-dimethylazetidide (LSZ). Drug Test Anal. 2017;9(1):38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Halberstadt AL, Klein LM, Chatha M, Valenzuela LB, Stratford A, Wallach J, et al. Pharmacological characterization of the LSD analog N-ethyl-N-cyclopropyl lysergamide (ECPLA). Psychopharmacology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-5055-9.
- 17.Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Twamley B, Westphal F, Elliott SP, Wallach J et al. Return of the lysergamides. Part IV: Analytical and pharmacological characterization of lysergic acid morpholide (LSM-775). Drug Test Anal. 2018;10(2):310–22.Google Scholar
- 18.EMCDDA. European drug report 2017: trends and developments. Publications of of the European Union 2017.Google Scholar
- 21.Dolder PC, Schmid Y, Haschke M, Rentsch KM, Liechti ME. Pharmacokinetics and Concentration-Effect Relationship of Oral LSD in Humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;19(1).Google Scholar
- 25.Meyer MR. Toxicokinetics of NPS: update 2017. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2018_102.
- 26.Mogler L, Wilde M, Huppertz LM, Weinfurtner G, Franz F, Auwarter V. Phase I metabolism of the recently emerged synthetic cannabinoid CUMYL-PEGACLONE and detection in human urine samples. Drug Test Anal. 2018;10(5):886-91.Google Scholar
- 29.Richter LHJ, Flockerzi V, Maurer HH, Meyer MR. Pooled human liver preparations, HepaRG, or HepG2 cell lines for metabolism studies of new psychoactive substances? A study using MDMA, MDBD, butylone, MDPPP, MDPV, MDPB, 5-MAPB, and 5-API as examples. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;143:32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Caspar AT, Westphal F, Meyer MR, Maurer HH. LC-high resolution-MS/MS for identification of 69 metabolites of the new psychoactive substance 1-(4-ethylphenyl-)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)methyl] propane-2-amine (4-EA-NBOMe) in rat urine and human liver S9 incubates and comparison of its screening power with further MS techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(3):897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Meyer MR, Lindauer C, Welter J, Maurer HH. Dimethocaine, a synthetic cocaine analogue: studies on its in-vivo metabolism and its detectability in urine by means of a rat model and liquid chromatography-linear ion-trap (high-resolution) mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(7):1845–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Maurer HH, Pfleger K, Weber AA. Mass spectral data of drugs, poisons, pesticides, pollutants and their metabolites. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim; 2016.Google Scholar
- 42.Steuer AE, Poetzsch M, Stock L, Eisenbeiss L, Schmid Y, Liechti ME, et al. Development and validation of an ultra-fast and sensitive microflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (MFLC-MS/MS) method for quantification of LSD and its metabolites in plasma and application to a controlled LSD administration study in humans. Drug Test Anal. 2017;9(5):788–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Dolder PC, Liechti ME, Rentsch KM. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method to quantify lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), iso-LSD, 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD, and nor-LSD and identify novel metabolites in plasma samples in a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(2).Google Scholar
- 47.Richter LHJ, Maurer HH, Meyer MR. New psychoactive substances: studies on the metabolism of XLR-11, AB-PINACA, FUB-PB-22, 4-methoxy-alpha-PVP, 25-I-NBOMe, and meclonazepam using human liver preparations in comparison to primary human hepatocytes, and human urine. Toxicol Lett. 2017;280:142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Niessen WM, Correa RA. Interpretation of MS-MS mass spectra of drugs and pesticides. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.Google Scholar
- 50.Koonrungsesomboon N, Khatsri R, Wongchompoo P, Teekachunhatean S. The impact of genetic polymorphisms on CYP1A2 activity in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2018;18(6):760–8.Google Scholar