Optimization, performance, and application of a pyrolysis-GC/MS method for the identification of microplastics
Plastics are found to be major debris composing marine litter; microplastics (MP, < 5 mm) are found in all marine compartments. The amount of MPs tends to increase with decreasing size leading to a potential misidentification when only visual identification is performed. These last years, pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) has been used to get information on the composition of polymers with some applications on MP identification. The purpose of this work was to optimize and then validate a Py-GC/MS method, determine limit of detection (LOD) for eight common polymers, and apply this method on environmental MP. Optimization on multiple GC parameters was carried out using polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microspheres. The optimized Py-GC/MS method require a pyrolysis temperature of 700 °C, a split ratio of 5 and 300 °C as injector temperature. Performance assessment was accomplished by performing repeatability and intermediate precision tests and calculating limit of detection (LOD) for common polymers. LODs were all below 1 μg. For performance assessment, identification remains accurate despite a decrease in signal over time. A comparison between identifications performed with Raman micro spectroscopy and with Py-GC/MS was assessed. Finally, the optimized method was applied to environmental samples, including plastics isolated from sea water surface, beach sediments, and organisms collected in the marine environment. The present method is complementary to μ-Raman spectroscopy as Py-GC/MS identified pigment containing particles as plastic. Moreover, some fibers and all particles from sediment and sea surface were identified as plastic.
KeywordsMicroplastics Pyrolysis Gas chromatography Method Environmental samples
Ludovic Hermabessiere is grateful to the Hauts-de-France Region and ANSES (French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety) for the financial support of his PhD. Maria Kazour is financially supported by a PhD fellowship from the National Council for Scientific Research (Lebanon) and Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale (France).
This paper has been funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR) (ANR-15-CE34-0006-02), as part of the nanoplastics project and also by the French government and the Hauts-de-France Region in the framework of the project CPER 2014-2020 MARCO.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.PlasticsEurope. Plastics – the Facts 2017: an analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. 2018. Available on: http://www.plasticseurope.fr/Document/plastics%2D%2D-the-facts-2017.aspx?FolID=2, Accessed on: 01/29/2018.
- 5.Eriksen M, Lebreton LC, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ, Borerro JC, et al. Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Arthur, C., J. Baker, H. Bamford. International research workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic marine debris. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-30; 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:127–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.CAMPUS. 2018. Available on: https://www.campusplastics.com/campus/list. Accessed on: 01/26/2018.
- 17.Oßmann BE, Sarau G, Schmitt SW, Holtmannspötter H, Christiansen SH, Dicke W. Development of an optimal filter substrate for the identification of small microplastic particles in food by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:4099–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0358-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Phuong NN, Zalouk-Vergnoux A, Kamari A, Mouneyrac C, Amiard F, Poirier L, Lagarde F. Quantification and characterization of microplastics in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis): protocol setup and preliminary data on the contamination of the French Atlantic coast. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8862-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fries E, Dekiff JH, Willmeyer J, Nuelle M-T, Ebert M, Remy D. Identification of polymer types and additives in marine microplastic particles using pyrolysis-GC/MS and scanning electron microscopy. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15:1949–56. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00214D.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ceccarini A, Corti A, Erba F, Modugno F, La Nasa J, Bianchi S, et al. The hidden microplastics. New insights and figures from the thorough separation and characterization of microplastics and of their degradation by-products in coastal sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tsuge S, Ohtani H, Watanabe C. Pyrolysis-GC/MS data book of synthetic polymers. Elsevier; 2011. p 390.Google Scholar
- 33.Kusch P. Application of pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), in characterization and analysis of microplastics. In: Rocha-Santos T, Duarte A, editors. Elsevier; 2016. p 306.Google Scholar
- 36.International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 5725-3: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-part 3: intermediate measures of the precision of a standard measurement method. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1994.Google Scholar
- 37.Caporal-Gautier J, Nivet JM, Algranti P, Guilloteau M, Histe M, Lallier M, et al. Guide de validation analytique: rapport d'une commission SFSTP I: méthodologie. STP Pharma Pratiques. 1992;2:205–26.Google Scholar
- 38.Frère L, Paul-Pont I, Rinnert E, Petton S, Jaffré J, Bihannic I, et al. Influence of environmental and anthropogenic factors on the composition, concentration and spatial distribution of microplastics: a case study of the bay of Brest (Brittany, France). Environ Pollut. 2017;225:211–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2014. 2015. Available on: http://www.R-project.org, Accessed on: 10/15/2015.
- 40.De Mendiburu F. Agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2014. R package version.Google Scholar
- 41.McGuffin VL. Theory of chromatography, in Journal of Chromatography Library. Elsevier; 2004. p. 1–93.Google Scholar
- 43.Simon M, van Alst N, Vollertsen J. Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying focal plane array (FPA)-based Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging. Water Res. 2018;142:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Ibrahim SF, van den Engh G. Flow cytometry and cell sorting, in cell separation: fundamentals, analytical and preparative methods. In: Kumar A, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. p. 19–39.Google Scholar
- 49.Erni-Cassola G, Gibson MI, Thompson RC, Christie-Oleza JA. Lost, but found with Nile Red: a novel method for detecting and quantifying small microplastics (1 mm to 20 μm) in environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:13641–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Imhof HK, Laforsch C, Wiesheu AC, Schmid J, Anger PM, Niessner R, et al. Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes. Water Res. 2016;98:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 51.Endo S, Takizawa R, Okuda K, Takada H, Chiba K, Kanehiro H, et al. Concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in beached resin pellets: variability among individual particles and regional differences. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;50:1103–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Käppler A, Fischer M, Scholz-Böttcher BM, Oberbeckmann S, Labrenz M, Fischer D, et al. Comparison of μ-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and py-GCMS as identification tools for microplastic particles and fibers isolated from river sediments. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1185-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.González N, Fernández-Berridi MJ. Application of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in the study of interactions between PVC and plasticizers: PVC/plasticizer compatibility versus chemical structure of plasticizer. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;101:1731–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Falkenhagen J, Sturm H, et al. Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters? Environ Pollut. 2017;231:1256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar