Photophysical properties of bichromophoric Fe(II) complexes bearing an aromatic electron acceptor

  • Antonio Francés-MonerrisEmail author
  • Philippe C. Gros
  • Mariachiara Pastore
  • Xavier Assfeld
  • Antonio Monari
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 11th Congress on Electronic Structure: Principles and Applications (ESPA-2018)


The replacement of heavy metals used by industry to produce optical devices would considerably reduce the environmental and economic cost of man-made technology. A possible strategy relies on the employment of lighter and more abundant metals like iron. The exploitability of the photophysics of Fe(II) complexes is, however, generally limited by their short excited-state lifetimes and poor emission properties. The present work studies the impact of appending an electron acceptor (anthracene) to N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) iron complexes with the aim to trap the excited-state energy and, therefore, delay the excited-state decay of the considered iron compounds. Hence, the photophysical properties of six prototypes (built with different spacers between the NHC ligand and the anthracene moieties) have been studied by using time-dependent density functional theory and by determining the natural transition orbitals of the excited states. The computational results suggest that ethynyl bridges induce dual absorption properties, covering red and infrared wavelengths in addition to the violet–blue absorption of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer band, already reported for the parent compound. The nature of the lowest lying triplet states indicates that, for all the considered prototypes, the excitation involves π* orbitals localized over anthracene, confirming its electron acceptor capabilities and suggesting a possible equilibrium between different excited states that might lead to enhanced excited-state lifetimes and/or boosted luminescence properties.


Fe(II) complexes Excited states TD-DFT Electron acceptor N-heterocyclic carbene Anthracene 



The authors thank Prof. Stefan Haacke (Université de Strasbourg) for his valuable suggestions and fruitful scientific discussions. This work has been funded by the French Agence Nationale de la Reserche (ANR) under the PhotIron project. A. F.-M. acknowledges the French Région Grand Est government and the ANR for postdoctoral contracts, and the financial support from the project CTQ2017-87054-C2-2-P of the Spanish MICINN. All calculations have been done using the local computing resources of the LPCT laboratory.

Supplementary material

214_2019_2471_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (786 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 786 kb)


  1. 1.
    Wenger OS (2018) Photoactive complexes with earth-abundant metals. J Am Chem Soc 140:13522–13533. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbieri A, Accorsi G, Armaroli N (2008) Luminescent complexes beyond the platinum group: the d10 avenue. Chem Commun. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Regan B, Grätzel M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353:737–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browne WR, Feringa BL (2006) Making molecular machines work. Nat Nanotechnol 1:25–35. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colasson B, Credi A, Ragazzon G (2016) Light-driven molecular machines based on ruthenium(II) polypyridine complexes: strategies and recent advances. Coord Chem Rev 325:125–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalinowski J, Fattori V, Cocchi M, Williams JAG (2011) Light-emitting devices based on organometallic platinum complexes as emitters. Coord Chem Rev 255:2401–2425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wenger OS (2019) Is iron the new ruthenium? Chem Eur J. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bressler C, Milne C, Pham V-T et al (2009) Femtosecond XANES study of the light-induced spin crossover dynamics in an iron(II) complex. Science 323(80):489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang W, Alonso-Mori R, Bergmann U et al (2014) Tracking excited-state charge and spin dynamics in iron coordination complexes. Nature 509:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kjaer KS, Kunnus K, Harlang TCB et al (2018) Solvent control of charge transfer excited state relaxation pathways in [Fe(2,2′-bipyridine)(CN)4]2−. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:4238–4249. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chábera P, Kjaer KS, Prakash O et al (2018) FeII hexa N-heterocyclic carbene complex with a 528 ps metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited-state lifetime. J Phys Chem Lett. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monat JE, McCusker JK (2000) Femtosecond excited-state dynamics of an iron(II) polypyridyl solar cell sensitizer model. J Am Chem Soc 122:4092–4097. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gawelda W, Cannizzo A, Pham V-T et al (2007) Ultrafast nonadiabatic dynamics of [FeII(bpy)3]2+ in solution. J Am Chem Soc 129:8199–8206. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashley DC, Jakubikova E (2017) Ironing out the photochemical and spin-crossover behavior of Fe(II) coordination compounds with computational chemistry. Coord Chem Rev 337:97–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fredin LA, Pápai M, Rozsályi E et al (2014) Exceptional excited-state lifetime of an iron(II)–N-heterocyclic carbene complex explained. J Phys Chem Lett 5:2066–2071. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sousa C, De Graaf C, Rudavskyi A et al (2013) Ultrafast deactivation mechanism of the excited singlet in the light-induced spin crossover of [Fe(2,2-bipyridine)3]2+. Chem Eur J 19:17541–17551. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Graaf C, Sousa C (2011) On the role of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer states in the light-induced spin crossover in FeII(bpy)3. Int J Quantum Chem 111:3385–3393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pápai M, Vankó G, de Graaf C, Rozgonyi T (2013) Theoretical investigation of the electronic structure of Fe(II) complexes at spin-state transitions. J Chem Theory Comput 9:509–519. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nance J, Bowman DN, Mukherjee S et al (2015) Insights into the spin-state transitions in [Fe(tpy)2]2+: importance of the terpyridine rocking motion. Inorg Chem 54:11259–11268. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lees AJ, Long C (2010) Photophysics of organometallics. Top Organomet Chem 29:37–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duchanois T, Liu L, Pastore M et al (2018) NHC-based iron sensitizers for DSSCs. Inorganics 6:63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu L, Duchanois T, Etienne T et al (2016) A new record excited state 3 MLCT lifetime for metalorganic iron(ii) complexes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:12550–12556. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Francés-Monerris A, Magra K, Darari M et al (2018) Synthesis and computational study of a pyridylcarbene Fe(II) complex: unexpected effects of fac/mer isomerism in metal-to-ligand triplet potential energy surfaces. Inorg Chem 57:10431–10441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magra K, Domenichini E, Francés-Monerris A et al (2019) Impact of the fac/mer isomerism on the excited-state dynamics of pyridyl-carbene Fe(II) complexes. Inorg Chem 58:5069–5081. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kjær KS, Kaul N, Prakash O et al (2019) Luminescence and reactivity of a charge-transfer excited iron complex with nanosecond lifetime. Science 363(80):249–253. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang X, Chi Z, Zhang Y et al (2013) Recent advances in mechanochromic luminescent metal complexes. J Mater Chem C 1:3376–3390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dong Y, Zhang J, Tan X et al (2013) Multi-stimuli responsive fluorescence switching: the reversible piezochromism and protonation effect of a divinylanthracene derivative. J Mater Chem C 1:7554–7559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Londesborough MGS, Dolanský J, Cerdán L et al (2017) Thermochromic fluorescence from B18H20(NC5H5)2: an inorganic-organic composite luminescent compound with an unusual molecular geometry. Adv Opt Mater 5:1600694. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi C, Zhu Y, Zhu G et al (2018) Phototunable full-color emission of dynamic luminescent materials. J Mater Chem C 6:9552–9560. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leydet Y, Bassani DM, Jonusauskas G, McClenaghan ND (2007) Equilibration between three different excited states in a bichromophoric copper(I) polypyridine complex. J Am Chem Soc 129:8688–8689. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Armaroli N (2008) Electronic excited-state engineering. ChemPhysChem 9:371–373. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Denisov SA, Cudré Y, Verwilst P et al (2014) Direct observation of reversible electronic energy transfer involving an iridium center. Inorg Chem 53:2677–2682. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yarnell JE, McCusker CE, Leeds AJ et al (2016) Exposing the excited-state equilibrium in an IrIII bichromophore: a combined time resolved spectroscopy and computational study. Eur J Inorg Chem 2016:1808–1818. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zigler DF, Elvington MC, Heinecke J, Brewer KJ (2006) Luminescently tagged 2,2′-bipyridine complex of FeII: synthesis and photophysical studies of 4-[N-(2-anthryl)carbamoyl]-4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine. Inorg Chem 45:6565–6567. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Birks JB (1970) Photophysics of aromatic molecules. Wiley-Interscience, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hunter TF, Wyatt RF (1970) Intersystem crossing in anthracene. Chem Phys Lett 6:221–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kellogg RE (1966) Second triplet state of anthracene. J Chem Phys 44:411–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ferguson J, Mau AW-H (1974) Phosphorescence of anthracene. Mol Phys 28:469–477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Widman RP, Huber JR (1972) Temperature effects in the intersystem crossing process of anthracene. J Phys Chem 76:1524–1527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Duchanois T, Etienne T, Cebrián C et al (2015) An iron-based photosensitizer with extended excited-state lifetime: photophysical and photovoltaic properties: an iron-based photosensitizer with extended excited-state lifetime. Eur J Inorg Chem 2015:2469–2477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pastore M, Duchanois T, Liu L et al (2016) Interfacial charge separation and photovoltaic efficiency in Fe(II)-carbene sensitized solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:28069–28081. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu Y, Harlang T, Canton SE et al (2013) Towards longer-lived metal-to-ligand charge transfer states of iron(II) complexes: an N-heterocyclic carbene approach. Chem Commun 49:6412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Urch CJ (2001) Aromatic interactions. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2:651–669. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Halet J-F, Lapinte C (2013) Charge delocalization vs localization in carbon-rich iron mixed-valence complexes: a subtle interplay between the carbon spacer and the (dppe)Cp*Fe organometallic electrophore. Coord Chem Rev 257:1584–1613. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Boese AD, Handy NC (2001) A new parametrization of exchange–correlation generalized gradient approximation functionals. J Chem Phys 114:5497–5503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Duchanois T, Etienne T, Beley M et al (2014) Heteroleptic pyridyl-carbene iron complexes with tuneable electronic properties. Eur J Inorg Chem 2014:3747–3753. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kepp KP (2016) Theoretical study of spin crossover in 30 iron complexes. Inorg Chem 55:2717–2727. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dixon IM, Alary F, Boggio-Pasqua M, Heully J-L (2015) Reversing the relative 3MLCT–3MC order in Fe(II) complexes using cyclometallating ligands: a computational study aiming at luminescent Fe(II) complexes. Dalt Trans 44:13498–13503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mukherjee S, Torres DE, Jakubikova E (2017) HOMO inversion as a strategy for improving the light-absorption properties of Fe(II) chromophores. Chem Sci 8:8115–8126. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bowman DN, Bondarev A, Mukherjee S, Jakubikova E (2015) Tuning the electronic structure of Fe(II) polypyridines via donor atom and ligand scaffold modifications: a computational study. Inorg Chem 54:8786–8793. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bedford RB, Brenner PB, Carter E et al (2014) Iron phosphine catalyzed cross-coupling of tetraorganoborates and related group 13 nucleophiles with alkyl halides. Organometallics 33:5767–5780. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dahl JP, Springborg M (1988) The Morse oscillator in position space, momentum space, and phase space. J Chem Phys 88:4535–4547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barbatti M, Sen K (2016) Effects of different initial condition samplings on photodynamics and spectrum of pyrrole. Int J Quantum Chem 116:762–771. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Martin RL (2003) Natural transition orbitals. J Chem Phys 118:4775–4777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Etienne T, Assfeld X, Monari A (2014) Toward a quantitative assessment of electronic transitions” charge-transfer character. J Chem Theory Comput 10:3896–3905. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Etienne T, Assfeld X, Monari A (2014) New insight into the topology of excited states through detachment/attachment density matrices-based centroids of charge. J Chem Theory Comput 10:3906–3914. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB et al (2010) Gaussian09. Revis D01. Gaussian Inc., WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R (2005) Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem Rev 105:2999–3093. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jones RN (1947) The ultraviolet absorption spectra of anthracene derivatives. Chem Rev 41:353–371. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    de Montigny F, Argouarch G, Roisnel T et al (2008) Syntheses, structures, and properties of some piano-stool iron acetylides bearing a functional anthracenyl group. Organometallics 27:1912–1923. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    de Montigny F, Argouarch G, Costuas K et al (2005) Electron transfer and electron exchange between [Cp*(dppe)Fe]n+ (n = 0, 1) building blocks mediated by the 9,10-bis(ethynyl)anthracene bridge. Organometallics 24:4558–4572. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dreuw A, Weisman JL, Head-Gordon M (2003) Long-range charge-transfer excited states in time-dependent density functional theory require non-local exchange. J Chem Phys 119:2943–2946. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tozer DJ (2003) Relationship between long-range charge-transfer excitation energy error and integer discontinuity in Kohn–Sham theory. J Chem Phys 119:12697–12699. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pastore M, Mosconi E, De Angelis F, Grätzel M (2010) A computational investigation of organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: benchmark, strategies, and open issues. J Phys Chem C 114:7205–7212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ronca E, Angeli C, Belpassi L et al (2014) Density relaxation in time-dependent density functional theory: combining relaxed density natural orbitals and multireference perturbation theories for an improved description of excited states. J Chem Theory Comput 10:4014–4024. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC (2004) A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett 393:51–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de Lorraine, CNRSLPCTNancyFrance
  2. 2.Université de Lorraine, CNRSL2CMNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations