Cortisol stress response predicts 9-year risky driving convictions in male first-time driving-while-impaired offenders

  • Thomas G. BrownEmail author
  • Marie Claude Ouimet
  • Louise Nadeau
  • Jacques Tremblay
  • Christina Gianoulakis
  • Sophie Couture
  • Nathaniel Moxley-Kelly
Original Investigation



With driving while impaired by alcohol (DWI) representing a persistent burden on global health, better understanding and prevention of recidivism following a first-time DWI conviction are needed. Progress towards these goals is challenged by the marked heterogeneity in offender characteristics and a traffic safety literature that relies on subjective self-report measures and cross-sectional study designs. The present study tested the hypothesis that an objective neurobiological marker of behavioural maladjustment, the cortisol stress response (CSR), predicts future DWI and other traffic convictions over a 9-year follow-up period.


One hundred thirty-two male first-time DWI offenders and 31 non-offender comparators were recruited and assessed at intake for their substance use, psychosocial and psychological characteristics and CSR. Traffic conviction data were obtained from provincial driving records. Survival analysis estimated the association between CSR and risk of a traffic conviction over time.


In support of our hypothesis, blunted CSR predicted traffic convictions during the follow-up duration. This effect generalized to both DWI offenders and non-DWI drivers. While CSR was lower in DWI offenders compared to non-offenders, it did not specifically predict recidivism in DWI offenders. Modelling results indicated that blunted CSR, along with DWI offender group membership, experience seeking and drug use frequency, may demarcate a high-risk driver phenotype.


CSR is a neurobiological marker of a driver phenotype with elevated generalized driving risk. For drivers with characteristics consistent with this phenotype, expanding the focus of intervention to address multiple forms of risky driving may be necessary to curb their overall threat to traffic safety.


Cortisol Stress response Alcohol Impaired driving Offenders Prediction Survival analysis 



The authors would like to acknowledge Ms. Lucie Legault for her assistance in coordinating this study, Ms. Lyne Vezina and Mr. Maxime Breault of the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec for their assistance in extracting participant driving records, and the participants for their generous collaboration throughout the study’s duration.

Compliance with ethical standards

The Research Ethics Board of the Douglas Hospital Research Centre provided approval and oversight of all recruitment, informed consent and experimental procedures.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Adinoff B, Junghanns K, Kiefer F, Krishnan-Sarin S (2005) Suppression of the HPA axis stress-response: implications for relapse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 29:1351–1355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. af Wåhlberg A, Barraclough P, Freeman J (2017) Personality versus traffic accidents; meta-analysis of real and method effects. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 44:90–104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aharoni E, Vincent GM, Harenski CL, Calhoun VD, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Gazzaniga MS, Kiehl KA (2013) Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:6223–6228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahlin EM, Zador PL, Rauch WJ, Howard JM, Duncan GD (2011) First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed. J Crime Justice 39:137–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle C, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG (2001) AUDIT: the alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. Switzerland, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry TJ, Murray L, Fearon P, Moutsiana C, Johnstone T, Halligan SL (2017) Amygdala volume and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity to social stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 85:96–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaver KM, Barnes JC (2012) Genetic and nonshared environmental factors affect the likelihood of being charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and driving while intoxicated (DWI). Addict Behav 37:1377–1381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beitel GA, Sharp MC, Glauz WD (2000) Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol. Inj Prev 6:158–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop NJ (2011) Predicting rapid DUI recidivism using the driver risk inventory on a state-wide sample of Floridian DUI offenders. Drug Alcohol Depend 118:423–429. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, Lubar JO, Chen TJH, Comings DE (2000) The reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs 32:1–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boschloo L, Vogelzangs N, Licht CMM, Vreeburg SA, Smit JH, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, de Geus EJC, Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH (2011) Heavy alcohol use, rather than alcohol dependence, is associated with dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system. Drug Alcohol Depend 116:170–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown TG, Gianoulakis C, Tremblay J et al (2005) Salivary cortisol: a predictor of convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol? Alcohol Alcohol 40:474–481. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown TG, Ouimet MC, Nadeau L et al (2015) Sex differences in the personality and cognitive characteristics of first-time DWI offenders. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 76:928–934. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown TG, Ouimet MC, Eldeb M, Tremblay J, Vingilis E, Nadeau L, Pruessner J, Bechara A (2016) Personality, executive control, and neurobiological characteristics associated with different forms of risky driving. PLoS One 11:e0150227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown TG, Ouimet MC, Eldeb M, Tremblay J, Vingilis E, Nadeau L, Pruessner J, Bechara A (2017) The effect of age on the personality and cognitive characteristics of three distinct risky driving offender groups. Personal Individ Differ 113:48–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butcher J, Derksen J, Sloore H, Sirigatti S (2003) Objective personality assessment of people in diverse cultures: European adaptations of the MMPI-2. Behav Res Ther 41:819–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll D, Ginty AT, Whittaker AC, Lovallo WR, de Rooij SR (2017) The behavioural, cognitive, and neural corollaries of blunted cardiovascular and cortisol reactions to acute psychological stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 77:74–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavaiola AA, Strohmetz DB, Wolf JM, Lavender NJ (2003) Comparison of DWI offenders with non-DWI individuals on the MMPI-2 and the Michigan alcoholism screening test. Addict Behav 28:971–977. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chow S-C, Wang H, Shao J (2007) Sample size calculations in clinical research, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clermont Y (2018) Impaired driving statistics. Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  21. Couture S, Brown TG, Ouimet MC, Gianoulakis C, Tremblay J, Carbonneau R (2008) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to stress in male DUI recidivists. Accid Anal Prev 40:246–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Couture S, Ouimet MC, Gianoulakis C, Tremblay J, Kin NMKNY, Brochu S, Pruessner J, Dedovic K, Brown TG (2015) Lower cortisol activity is associated with first-time driving while impaired. Subst Abus Res Treat 9:25–32. Google Scholar
  23. Couture S, Ouimet MC, Dedovic K, Laurier C, Plusquellec P, Brown TG (2018) Blunted cortisol reactivity and risky driving in young offenders – a pilot study. Int J Adolesc Med Health 0:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dedovic K, Pruessner J, Tremblay J, Nadeau L, Ouimet MC, Lepage M, Brown TG (2016) Examining cortical thickness in male and female DWI offenders. Neurosci Lett 619:189–195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (2018) Highway statistics, 2017. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Gianoulakis C, Dai X, Thavundayil J, Brown T (2005) Levels and circadian rhythmicity of plasma ACTH, cortisol, and β-endorphin as a function of family history of alcoholism. Psychopharmacology 181:437–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glenn AL, Raine A (2014) Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:54–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harro J, Laas K, Eensoo D et al (2019) Orexin/hypocretin receptor gene (HCRTR1) variation is associated with aggressive behaviour. Neuropharmacology 107527.
  29. Hawes DJ, Brennan J, Dadds MR (2009) Cortisol, callous-unemotional traits, and pathways to antisocial behavior. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22:357–362. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ho AM-C, Geske JR, Bakalkin G, Winham SJ, Karpyak VM (2019) Correlations between sex-related hormones, alcohol dependence and alcohol craving. Drug Alcohol Depend 197:183–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubicka B, Källmén H, Hiltunen A, Bergman H (2010) Personality traits and mental health of severe drunk drivers in Sweden. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45:723–731. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Impinen A, Makela P, Karjalainen K et al (2010) High mortality among people suspected of drunk-driving. An 18-year register-based follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend 110:80–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH et al (2018) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet:1789–1858.
  34. Junghanns K, Backhaus J, Tietz U et al (2003) Impaired serum cortisol stress response is a predictor of early relapse. Alcohol Alcohol 38:189–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karlsson Linnér R, Biroli P, Kong E et al (2019) Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences. Nat Genet 51:245–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King A, Munisamy G, De Wit H, Lin S (2006) Attenuated cortisol response to alcohol in heavy social drinkers. Int J Psychophysiol 59:203–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kudielka BM, Gierens A, Hellhammer DH, Wüst S, Schlotz W (2012) Salivary cortisol in ambulatory assessment—some dos, some don’ts, and some open questions. Psychosom Med 74:418–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linn BK, Nochajski T, Wieczorek W (2016) Relationship of aggression, negative affect, substance use problems, and childhood delinquency to DWI recidivism. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 42:48–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lovallo WR, Cohoon AJ, Acheson A, Sorocco KH, Vincent AS (2019) Blunted stress reactivity reveals vulnerability to early life adversity in young adults with a family history of alcoholism. Addiction 114:798–806. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews KA, Rakaczky CJ, Stoney CM, Manuck SB (1987) Are cardiovascular responses to behavioral stressors a stable individual difference variable in childhood? Psychophysiology 24:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D et al (1992) The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abus Treat 9:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mick I, Spring K, Uhr M, Zimmermann US (2013) Alcohol administration attenuates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity in healthy men at low genetic risk for alcoholism, but not in high-risk subjects. Addict Biol 18:863–871. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller PG, Curtis A, Sønderlund A, Day A, Droste N (2015) Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 41:16–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2017) Alcohol-impaired driving: 2016 data. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. NHTSA (2018) Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national vehicle crash causation survey. 2018:2–4Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen L, Riddle M, King JW, Aklin WM, Chen W, Clark D, Collier E, Czajkowski S, Esposito L, Ferrer R, Green P, Hunter C, Kehl K, King R, Onken L, Simmons JM, Stoeckel L, Stoney C, Tully L, Weber W (2018) The NIH science of behavior change program: transforming the science through a focus on mechanisms of change. Behav Res Ther 101:3–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ouimet MC, Brown TG, Guo F, Klauer SG, Simons-Morton BG, Fang Y, Lee SE, Gianoulakis C, Dingus TA (2014) Higher crash and near-crash rates in teenaged drivers with lower cortisol response. JAMA Pediatr 168:517–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paaver M, Eensoo D, Pulver A, Harro J (2006) Adaptive and maladaptive impulsivity, platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity and risk-admitting in different types of risky drivers. Psychopharmacology 186:32–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Padilla JL, Doncel P, Gugliotta A, Castro C (2018) Which drivers are at risk? Factors that determine the profile of the reoffender driver. Accid Anal Prev 119:237–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J ClinPsychol 51:768–774Google Scholar
  51. Perreault S (2016) Impaired driving in Canada, 2015Google Scholar
  52. Petridou E, Moustaki M (2000) Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes. Eur J Epidemiol 16:819–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petridou E, Zavitsanos X, Dessypris N, Frangakis C, Mandyla M, Doxiadis S, Trichopoulos D (1997) Adolescents in high-risk trajectory: clustering of risky behavior and the origins of socioeconomic health differentials. Prev Med (Baltim) 26:215–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pruessner JC, Kirschbaum C, Meinlschmid G, Hellhammer DH (2003) Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:916–931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rauch WJ, Zador PL, Ahlin EM, Howard JM, Frissell KC, Duncan GD (2010) Risk of alcohol-impaired driving recidivism among first offenders and multiple offenders. Am J Public Health 100:919–924. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts W, Moore KE, Pittman BP et al (2019) High risk of alcohol-impaired driving in adults with comorbid alcohol and substance use disorders in the U.S. population. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 80:114–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rolison JJ, Regev S, Moutari S, Feeney A (2018) What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records. Accid Anal Prev 115:11–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sargin D (2019) The role of the orexin system in stress response. Neuropharmacology 154:68–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Selzer ML (1971) The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 127:1653–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skinner HA (1982) The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav 7:363–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sobell LC, Sobell MB (1992) Timeline follow-back. In: Litten RZ, Allen J (eds) Measuring alcohol consumption. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 41–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics, Sixth. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  63. van der Gronde T, Kempes M, van El C et al (2014) Neurobiological correlates in forensic assessment: a systematic review. PLoS One 9:e110672. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warren-Kigenyi N, Coleman H (2014) TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS DWI recidivism in the United States: an examination of state-level driver data and the effect of look-Back periods on recidivism prevalence. Washington, DC, DCGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson B, Watson A, Siskind V, Fleiter J, Soole D (2015) Profiling high-range speeding offenders: investigating criminal history, personal characteristics, traffic offences, and crash history. Accid Anal Prev 74:87–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Health Organisation (2016) The top 10 causes of death: the 10 leading causes of death by income group (2011–2016). 1–2Google Scholar
  67. World Health Organization (2015) Global status report on road safety, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  68. Zador PL, Krawchuk SA, Voas RB (2000) Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. J Stud Alcohol 61:387–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  70. Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM (2000) Personality and risk-taking: common bisocial factors. J Pers 68:999–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire en santé mentale DouglasMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Douglas Hospital Research CentreQuebecCanada
  3. 3.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Université de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  5. 5.Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  6. 6.Institut universitaire jeunes en difficultéMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations