Functional mismatch repair and inactive p53 drive sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to irinotecan via the IAP antagonist BV6
A common strategy to overcome acquired chemotherapy resistance is the combination of a specific anticancer drug (e.g., topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan) together with a putative sensitizer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cytostatic/cytotoxic response of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells to irinotecan, depending on the mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 status and to examine the impact of BV6, a bivalent antagonist of inhibitors of apoptosis c-IAP1/c-IAP2, alone or combined with irinotecan. Therefore, several MSH2- or MSH6-deficient cell lines were complemented for MMR deficiency, or MSH6 was knocked out/down in MMR-proficient cells. Upon irinotecan, MMR-deficient/p53-mutated lines repaired DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination less efficiently than MMR-proficient/p53-mutated lines and underwent elevated caspase-9-dependent apoptosis. Opposite, BV6-mediated sensitization was achieved only in MMR-proficient/p53-mutated cells. In those cells, c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 were effectively degraded by BV6, caspase-8 was fully activated, and both canonical and non-canonical NF-κB signaling were triggered. The results were confirmed ex vivo in tumor organoids from CRC patients. Therefore, the particular MMR+/p53mt signature, often found in non-metastasizing (stage II) CRC might be used as a prognostic factor for an adjuvant therapy using low-dose irinotecan combined with a bivalent IAP antagonist.
KeywordsIAP antagonist Irinotecan Colorectal cancer Mismatch repair p53 NF-κB
We thank Anna Frumkina for conducting neutral comet assay. The work was financed by Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung für Krebsforschung to MTT.
MTT: study design, experimental work, data analysis, paper writing. CS: experimental work. BR: technical assistance, experimental work. AB: contribution to a new model/methodology. MC: discussion and consulting.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Fallik D, Borrini F, Boige V et al (2003) Microsatellite instability is a predictive factor of the tumor response to irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 63(18):5738–5744Google Scholar
- Jacob S, Aguado M, Fallik D, Praz F (2001) The role of the DNA mismatch repair system in the cytotoxicity of the topoisomerase inhibitors camptothecin and etoposide to human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res 61(17):6555–6562Google Scholar
- Steigerwald C, Rasenberger B, Christmann M, Tomicic MT (2018) Sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to irinotecan by the Survivin inhibitor LLP3 depends on XAF1 proficiency in the context of mutated p53. Arch Toxicol 92(8):2645–2648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2240-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tomicic MT, Kaina B (2013) Topoisomerase degradation, DSB repair, p53 and IAPs in cancer cell resistance to camptothecin-like topoisomerase I inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1835(1):11–27Google Scholar