Advertisement

Interactions of human butyrylcholinesterase with phenylvalerate and acetylthiocholine as substrates and inhibitors: kinetic and molecular modeling approaches

  • Jorge EstévezEmail author
  • Felipe Rodrigues de Souza
  • María Romo
  • Iris Mangas
  • Tanos Celmar Costa Franca
  • Eugenio Vilanova
Molecular Toxicology
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Phenyl valerate (PV) is a substrate for measuring the PVase activity of neuropathy target esterase (NTE), a key molecular event of organophosphorus-induced delayed neuropathy. A protein with PVase activity in chicken (model for delayed neurotoxicity) was identified as butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). Purified human butyrylcholinesterase (hBChE) showed PVase activity with a similar sensitivity to inhibitors as its cholinesterase (ChE) activity. Further kinetic and theoretical molecular simulation studies were performed. The kinetics did not fit classic competition models among substrates. Partially mixed inhibition was the best-fitting model to acetylthiocholine (AtCh) interacting with PVase activity. ChE activity showed substrate activation, and non-competitive inhibition was the best-fitting model to PV interacting with the non-activated enzyme and partial non-competitive inhibition was the best fitted model for PV interacting with the activated enzyme by excess of AtCh. The kinetic results suggest that other sites could be involved in those activities. From the theoretical docking analysis, we deduced other more favorable sites for binding PV related with Asn289 residue, situated far from the catalytic site (“PV-site”). Both substrates acethylcholine (ACh) and PV presented similar docking values in both the PV-site and catalytic site pockets, which explained some of the observed substrate interactions. Molecular dynamic simulations based on the theoretical structure of crystallized hBChE were performed. Molecular modeling studies suggested that PV has a higher potential for non-competitive inhibition, being also able to inhibit the hydrolysis of ACh through interactions with the PV-site. Further theoretical studies also suggested that PV could yet be able to promote competitive inhibition. We concluded that the kinetic and theoretical studies did not fit the simple classic competition among substrates, but were compatible with the interaction with two different binding sites.

Keywords

Human butyrylcholinesterase Phenyl valerate Inhibition kinetics Docking Molecular dynamics 

Abbreviations

AtCh

Acethylthiocholine

ACh

Acethylcholine

AChE

Acetylcholinesterase (in general of any specie)

BChE

Butyrylcholinesterase (in general of any specie)

Ch

Choline

ChE

Cholinesterase (the activity)

hBChE

Human butyrylcholinesterase

MM-PBSA

Molecular Mechanics Poisson Boltzman Solver Area

NTE

Neuropathy target esterase

PV

Phenyl valerate

PVase

Phenyl valerate esterase (the activity)

PDB

Protein data bank

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to Dr. Douglas Cerasoli [USAMRICD (US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA] for the supply of hBChE.

Funding

Work was partly supported by project “Mecanismos moleculares de toxicidad de xenobióticos” from the University Miguel Hernández of Elche (Spain), (Reference; 50AV0050RP). This work was supported by the Brazilian financial agencies CAPES (fellowships), CNPq (Grant No 306156/2015-6), FAPERJ (Grant No E-02/202.961/2017), and also the by the excellence project FIM.

Supplementary material

204_2019_2423_MOESM1_ESM.docx (689 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 689 KB)

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723Google Scholar
  2. Almeida JS, Guizado TR, Guimaraes AP, Ramalho TC, Goncalves AS, de Koning MC, Franca TC (2015) Docking and molecular dynamics studies of peripheral site ligand-oximes as reactivators of sarin-inhibited human acetylcholinesterase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 34:2632–2642Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo LS, Moraes FP, Xavier MM, Pantoja EO, Villavicencio B, Finck JA, Proenca AM, Rocha KB, de Azevedo WF (2012) Recent progress of molecular docking simulations applied to development of drugs. Curr Bioinform 7(4):352–365Google Scholar
  4. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA (2001) Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. PNAS 98(18):10037–10041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barril J, Estévez J, Escudero MA, Céspedes MV, Níguez N, Sogorb MA, Monroy A, Vilanova E (1999) Peripheral nerve soluble esterases are spontaneously reactivated after inhibition by paraoxon: implications for a new definition of neuropathy target esterase. Chem Biol Interact 119–120:541–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastos L, da C, de Souza, Guimarães FR, Sirouspour AP, Guizado M, Forgione TRC, Ramalho P, França TC TCC (2016) Virtual screening, docking and dynamics of potential new inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase from Yersinia pestis. J Biomol Struct Dyn 34:2184–2198Google Scholar
  7. Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell W, Kollman PA (1993) A well- behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 97:10269–10280Google Scholar
  8. Benabent M, Vilanova E, Sogorb MA, Estévez J (2014) Cholinesterase assay by an efficient fixed time endpoint method. MethodsX 1:258–263PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosko JT, Todd BD, Sadus RJ (2005) Molecular simulation of dendrimers and their mixtures under shear: comparison of isothermal-isobaric (NpT) and isothermal-isochoric (NVT) ensemble systems. J Chem Phys 123(3):34905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Calamini B, Ratia K, Malkowski MG, Cuendet M, Pezuto JM, Santarsiero BD, Mesecar AD (2010) Pleiotropic mechanisms facilitated by resveratrol and its metabolites. Biochem J 429:273–282PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington CD, Abou-Donia MB (1984) The correlation between the recovery rate of neurotoxic esterase activity and sensitivity to organophosphorus-induced delayed neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 75(2):350–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Céspedes MV, Escudero MA, Barril J, Sogorb MA, Vicedo JL, Vilanova E (1997) Discrimination of carboxylesterases of chicken neural tissue by inhibition with a neuropathic, non-neuropathic organophosphorus compounds and neuropathy promoter. Chem Biol Interact 106(3):191–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chemnitius JM, Haselmeyer KH, Zech R (1983) Neurotoxic esterase. Identification of two isoenzymes in hen brain. Arch Toxicol 53(3):235–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Çokuğraş AN (2003) Butyrylcholinesterase: structure and physiological importance. Turk J Biochem 28(2):54–61Google Scholar
  16. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Kollman PA (1993) Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvation. J Am Chem Soc 115:9620–9631Google Scholar
  17. Cornish-Bowden A (2004) In principles of enzyme kinetics, 3rd edn. In: Cornish-Bowden A (ed) Portland Press, London, pp 36–39Google Scholar
  18. de Souza FR, Guimarães AP, Cuya T, de Freitas MP, Gonçalves AS, Forgione P, França TC (2016) Analysis of Coxiela burnetti dihydrofolate reductase via in silico docking with inhibitors and molecular dynamics simulation. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1102:1–12Google Scholar
  19. Escudero MA, Céspedes MV, Vilanova E (1997) Chromatographic discrimination of soluble neuropathy target esterase isoenzymes and related phenyl valerate esterases from chicken brain, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve. J Neurochem 68(5):2170–2176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Estévez J, García-Perez A, Barril J, Pellín MC, Vilanova E (2004) The inhibition of the high sensitive peripheral nerve soluble esterases by mipafox. A new mathematical processing for the kinetics of inhibition of esterases by organophosphorus compounds. Toxicol Lett 151:243–249Google Scholar
  21. Estévez J, Barril J, Vilanova E (2010) Inhibition with spontaneous reactivation and the “ongoing inhibition” effect of esterases by biotinylated organophosphorus compounds: S9B as a model. Chem Biol Interact 187(1–3):397–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Estévez J, García-Pérez A, Barril J, Vilanova E (2011) Inhibition with spontaneous reactivation of carboxyl esterases by organophosphorus compounds: paraoxon as a model. Chem Res Toxicol 24(1):135–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans DJ, Holian BL (1985) The Nose-Hoover thermostat. J Chem Phys 83(8):4069–4074Google Scholar
  24. Fišar Z, Hroudová J, Raboch J (2010) Inhibition of monoamine oxidase activity by antidepressants and moodstabilizers. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 31(5):645–656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Glynn P, Read DJ, Guo R, Wylie S, Johnson MK (1994) Synthesis and characterization of a biotinylated organophosphorus ester for detection and affinity purification of a brain serine esterase: neuropathy target esterase. Biochem J 301(2):551–556PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Glynn P, Holton JL, Nolan CC, Read DJ, Brown L, Hubbard A, Cavanagh JB (1998) Neuropathy target esterase: immunolocalization to neuronal cell bodies and axons. Neuroscience 83(1):295–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Guex N, Peitsch MC (1997) SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18:2714–2723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Harel M, Sussman JL, Krejci E, Bon S, Chanal P, Massoulié J, Silman I (1992) Conversion of acetylcholinesterase to butyrylcholinesterase: modeling and mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10827–10831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hess B, Kutzner C, Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Homeyer N, Gohlke H (2012) Free energy calculations by the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area method. Mol Inform 31(2):114–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu Z, Jiang J (2009) Assessment of biomolecular force fields for molecular dynamics simulations in a protein crystal. J Comput Chem 31:371–380Google Scholar
  32. Huang SY, Zou X (2010) Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. Int J Mol Sci 11:3016–3034PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jayaram B, Sprous D, Young MA, Beveridge DL (1998) Free energy analysis of the conformational preferences of A and B forms of DNA in solution. J Am Chem Soc 120(41):10629–10633Google Scholar
  34. Johnson MK (1975) Structure-activity relationships for substrates and inhibitors of hen brain neurotoxic esterase. Biochem Pharmacol 24(7):797–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson MK (1977) Improved assay of neurotoxic esterase for screening organophosphates for delayed neurotoxicity potential. Arch Toxicol 37(2):113–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935Google Scholar
  37. Kar P, Lipowsky R, Knecht V (2013) Importance of polar solvation and configurational entropy for design of antiretroviral drugs targeting HIV-1 protease. J Phys Chem B 117(19):5793–5805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kontoyanni M, McClellan LM, Sokol GS (2004) Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. J Med Chem 47:558–565Google Scholar
  39. Kovarik Z, Radić Z, Berman HA, Simeon-Rudolf V, Reiner E, Taylor P (2003) Acetylcholinesterase active centre and gorge conformations analysed by combinatorial mutations and enantiomeric phosphonates. Biochem J 373:33–40PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumari R, Kumar R, Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, Lynn A (2014) g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J Chem Inf Model 54(7):1951–1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Li XQ, Andersson TB, Ahlström M, Weidolf L (2004) Comparison of inhibitory effects of the proton pump-inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lanso-prazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole on human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos 32:821–827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mangas I, Vilanova E, Estévez J (2011) Kinetics of the inhibitory interaction of organophosphorus neuropathy inducers and non-inducers in soluble esterases in the avian nervous system. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 256:360–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mangas I, Vilanova E, Estévez J (2012) Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, a potentiator of neuropathy, alters the interaction of organophosphorus compounds with soluble brain esterases. Chem Res Toxicol 25(11):2393–2401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mangas I, Radić Z, Taylor P, Ghassemian M, Candela H, Vilanova E, Estévez J (2017a) Butyrylcholinesterase identification in a phenylvalerate esterase-enriched fraction sensitive to low mipafox concentrations in chicken brain. Arch Toxicol 91(2):909–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mangas I, Vilanova E, Estévez J (2017b) Phenyl valerate esterase activity of human butyrylcholinesterase. Arch Toxicol 91:3295–3305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Martínez L, Borin IA, Skaf MS (2007) Fundamentos de Simulação por Dinâmica Molecular. In: Morgon NH, Coutinho K (eds) Métodos de Química Teórica e Modelagem Molecular. Editora Livraria da Física, São Paulo, pp 413–452 (ISBN: 9788588325876$4) Google Scholar
  47. Masson P, Adkins S, Gouet P, Lockridge O (1993) Recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase G390V, the fluoride-2 variant, expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, is a low affinity variant. J Biol Chem 268(19):14329–14341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Masson P, Xie W, Froment MT, Levitsky V, Fortier PL, Albaret C, Lockridge O (1999) Interaction between the peripheral site residues of human butyrylcholinesterase, D70 and Y332, in binding and hydrolysis of substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta 1433(1–2):281–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Masson P, Xie W, Froment MT, Lockridge O (2001) Effects of mutations of active site residues and amino acids interacting with the Omega loop on substrate activation of butyrylcholinesterase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1544(1–2):166–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nicolet Y, Lockridge O, Masson P, Fontecilla-Camps JC, Nachon F (2003) Crystal structure of human butyrylcholinesterase and of its complexes with substrate and products. J Biol Chem 278:41141–41147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J App Phys 52(12):7182–7190Google Scholar
  52. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3381–3385PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Shao Y, Molnar LF, Jung Y, Kussmann J, Ochsenfeld C, Brown ST, Head-Gordon M (2006) Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Phys Chem 8(27):3172–3191Google Scholar
  54. Silva AWS, Vranken WF (2012) ACPYPE—AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res Notes 23:5:367Google Scholar
  55. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B (1994) Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using macroscopic solvent models. J Phys Chem 98(7):1978–1988Google Scholar
  56. Suárez D, Field MJ (2005) Molecular dynamics simulations of human butyrylcholinesterase. Proteins 59:104–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Suárez D, Díaz N, Fontecilla-Camps J, Field MJ (2006) A computational study of the deacylation mechanism of human butyrylcholinesterase. Biochemistry 45:7529–7543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomsen R, Christensen MH (2006) MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking. J Med Chem 49:3315–3321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, van Buuren AR, Apol E, Meulenhoff PJ, Tieleman DP, Sijbers ALTM, Feenstra KA, van Drunen R, Berendsen HJC (2005) GROMACS user manual version 3.3. http://www.gromacs.org. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
  61. Vilanova E, Barril J, Carrera V, Pellin MC (1990) Soluble and particulate forms of the organophosphorus neuropathy target esterase in hen sciatic nerve. J Neurochem 55(4):1258–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J (1998) Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins 32(4):399–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiesner J, Kříž Z, Kuča K, Jun D, Koča J (2010) Why acetylcholinesterase reactivators do not work in butyrylcholinesterase. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 25(3):318–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wong KKK, Ngo JC, Liu S, Lina H, Hu C, Shaw PC, Wan DC (2010) Interaction study of two diterpenes, cryptotanshinone and dihydrotanshinone,to human acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase by molecular docking and kinetic analysis. Chem Biol Interact 187:335–339PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Estévez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Felipe Rodrigues de Souza
    • 2
  • María Romo
    • 1
  • Iris Mangas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tanos Celmar Costa Franca
    • 2
    • 3
  • Eugenio Vilanova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of BioengineeringUniversity Miguel HernándezElcheSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory of Molecular Modeling Applied to the Chemical and Biological Defense (LMCBD)Military Institute of EngineeringRio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.Center for Basic and Applied Research, Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations