Evaluation of inhaled low-dose formaldehyde-induced DNA adducts and DNA–protein cross-links by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
- 356 Downloads
As a widespread industrial chemical, formaldehyde carcinogenicity has been highly controversial. Meanwhile, formaldehyde is an essential metabolite in all living cells. Previously, we have demonstrated exogenous formaldehyde causes DNA adducts in a nonlinear manner between 0.7 and 15.2 ppm using [13CD2]-formaldehyde for exposure coupled with the use of sensitive mass spectrometry. However, the responses from exposure to low doses of formaldehyde are still unknown. In this study, rats were exposed to 1, 30, and 300 ppb [13CD2]-formaldehyde for 28 days (6 h/day) by nose-only inhalation, followed by measuring DNA mono-adduct (N2-HOMe-dG) and DNA–protein crosslinks (dG-Me-Cys) as formaldehyde specific biomarkers. Both exogenous and endogenous DNA mono-adducts and dG-Me-Cys were examined with ultrasensitive nano-liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Our data clearly show that endogenous adducts are present in all tissues analyzed, but exogenous adducts were not detectable in any tissue samples, including the most susceptible nasal epithelium. Moreover, formaldehyde exposure at 1, 30 and 300 ppb did not alter the levels of endogenous formaldehyde-induced DNA adducts or DNA–protein crosslinks. The novel findings from this study provide new data for risk assessment of exposure to low doses of formaldehyde.
KeywordsFormaldehyde DNA damage DNA adducts DNA–protein crosslinks Mass spectrometry
Higher-energy collisional dissociation
Tandem mass spectrometry
Parallel reaction monitoring
Selected reaction monitoring
We thank Dr. Leonard Collins for his assistance with HPLC purification and nano-UPLC–MS–MS. This project received funding from the American Chemistry Council and Formacare. The instrumentation was partially supported by funding from the NIEHS (R01ES024950 and P30ES010126). None of the funding agencies is involved in writing or have access to the manuscript before its submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
- Edrissi B, Taghizadeh K, Moeller BC, Yu R, Kracko D, Doyle-Eisele M et al (2017) N6-formyllysine as a biomarker of formaldehyde exposure: formation and loss of N6-formyllysine in nasal epithelium in long-term, low-dose inhalation studies in rats. Chem Res Toxicol 30:1572–1576CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (2006) Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 88:1–478Google Scholar
- Lai Y, Yu R, Hartwell HJ, Moeller BC, Bodnar WM, Swenberg JA (2016) Measurement of endogenous versus exogenous formaldehyde-induced DNA–protein crosslinks in animal tissues by stable isotope labeling and ultrasensitive mass spectrometry. Cancer Res 76:2652–2661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moeller BC, Lu K, Doyle-Eisele M, McDonald J, Gigliotti A, Swenberg JA (2011) Determination of N2-hydroxymethyl-dG adducts in the nasal epithelium and bone marrow of nonhuman primates following 13CD2-formaldehyde inhalation exposure. Chem Res Toxicol 24:162–164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar