Advertisement

Response to Uptake of microplastics and related health effects: a critical discussion of Deng et al., Scientific reports 7: 46687, 2017

  • Yongfeng Deng
  • Yan ZhangEmail author
Letter to the Editor, News and Views

We would like to thank Dr. Braeuning and other potential readers for their interests in our paper named “Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure” (Deng et al. 2017). After carefully reviewing the critical discussion (Braeuning 2018), there are two main concerns in regard to whether microplastics used in our study could enter mouse tissues and the biomarkers including serum metabolites and tissue histological changes were appropriate to elucidate the biological responses induced by microplastics. We try to respond to these concerns by elucidating the following scientific questions:

  1. 1.

    How could big microplastics enter mammal tissues?

     

Although the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) claimed the particles with sizes over 1.5 µm may not cross the mammalian intestinal barrier and cannot subsequently distribute in other tissues (Chain 2016), we really think this is an immature conclusion. Because several valuable...

Notes

References

  1. Braeuning A (2018) Uptake of microplastics and related health effects: a critical discussion of Deng et al. Scientific reports 7:46687, 2017. Arch Toxicol 2018:1–2Google Scholar
  2. Bu Q, Yan G, Deng P et al (2010) NMR-based metabonomic study of the sub-acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in rats after oral administration. Nanotechnology 21(12):125105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chain EPoCitF (2016) Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. EFSA J 14(6):e04501Google Scholar
  4. Clarke CJ, Haselden JN (2008) Metabolic profiling as a tool for understanding mechanisms of toxicity. Toxicol Pathol 36(1):140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lemos B, Ren H (2017) Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci Rep 7:46687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eldridge JH, Meulbroek JA, Staas JK, Tice TR, Gilley RM (1989) Vaccine-containing biodegradable microspheres specifically enter the gut-associated lymphoid tissue following oral administration and induce a disseminated mucosal immune response immunobiology of proteins and peptides V. Springer, Boston, MA, p 191–202Google Scholar
  7. Freedman B (1991) Persorption of raw starch: a cause of senile dementia? Med Hypotheses 35(2):85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffin JL (2003) Metabonomics: NMR spectroscopy and pattern recognition analysis of body fluids and tissues for characterisation of xenobiotic toxicity and disease diagnosis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 7(5):648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. LeFevre M, Boccio A, Joel D (1989) Intestinal uptake of fluorescent microspheres in young and aged mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 190(1):23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lu Y, Zhang Y, Deng Y et al (2016) Response to comment on “uptake and accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in zebrafish (danio rerio) and toxic effects in liver”. Environ Sci Technol 50(22):12523–12524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Markley JL, Brüschweiler R, Edison AS et al (2017) The future of NMR-based metabolomics. Curr Opin Biotech 43:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Powell JJ, Faria N, Thomas-McKay E, Pele LC (2010) Origin and fate of dietary nanoparticles and microparticles in the gastrointestinal tract. J Autoimmun 34(3):J226–J233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Steffens K-J (1995) Persorption—Criticism and agreement as based upon in vitro and in vivo studies on mammals absorption of orally administered enzymes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 9–21Google Scholar
  14. Volkheimer G (1975) Hematogenous dissemination of ingested polyvinyl chloride particles. Ann Ny Acad Sci 246(1):164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Volkheimer G (1998) The phenomenon of persorption: persorption, dissemination, and elimination of microparticles. In: Old Herborn University seminar monograph, 2001, vol 14. Herborn Litterae, p 7–18Google Scholar
  16. Wright SL, Kelly FJ (2017) Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environ Sci Technol 51(12):6634–6647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang L, Hatzakis E, Nichols RG et al (2015) Metabolomics reveals that aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation by environmental chemicals induces systemic metabolic dysfunction in mice. Environ Sci Technol 49(13):8067–8077CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the EnvironmentNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations