Advertisement

Investigation of the effect of different environmental conditions on biofilm structure of Salmonella enterica serotype Virchow via FTIR spectroscopy

  • Mohammad Nima Ariafar
  • Nasit Iğci
  • Mustafa Akçelik
  • Nefise AkçelikEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aims to describe the content of polymeric matrix components under different incubation temperatures and pH levels. Optimal biofilm production of 15 S. Virchow isolates occurred following the incubation in LB−NaCl for 72 h, at pH 6.6 and 20 °C. The expression of csgA, csgD, adrA and bcsA genes at 20 °C, 25 °C and 30 °C in S. Virchow DMC18 was analyzed, and it was discovered that the maximum production of cellulose and curli fimbriae occurred at 20 °C. The physical characteristics of pellicle structure of S. Virchow DMC18 was determined as rigid at 20 °C, while becoming fragile at higher temperatures. FTIR analyses confirmed the obtained molecular findings. The intensities of the 16 different peaks originating from carbohydrate, protein, and nucleic acid in the spectra of biofilm samples significantly diminished (p < 0.05) with the increasing temperature. The highest intensities of lipids and carbohydrates were observed at 20 °C indicating the changes in cell surface properties.

Keywords

Salmonella Virchow Biofilm FTIR Cellulose Curli fimbriae csgD 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

NA: coordinated and drafted the manuscript, carried out the experiments. Nİ: performed the FTIR experiments and participated in the interpretation of the FTIR results. NA* and MA conceived of the study and planned the experiments, supervised the project and took the lead in the writing the manuscript. All the authors provided critical feedback and helped the research, analysis and manuscript.

References

  1. Adiguzel Y, Haris PI, Severcan F (2012) Screening of proteins in cells and tissues by vibrational spectroscopy. In: Severcan F, Haris PI (eds) Chapter 3, screening of proteins in cell and tissues by vibrational spectroscopy, 1st edn. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 53–108Google Scholar
  2. Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, Klausen M, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S, Molin S, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T (2006) A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 59:1114–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berne C, Kysela DT, Brun YV (2010) A bacterial extracellular DNA inhibits settling of motile progeny cells within a biofilm. Mol Microbiol 77:815–829Google Scholar
  4. Borges KA, Furian TA, Souza SN, Menezes R, Tando EC, Salle CTP, Maraes HLS, Nascimento VP (2018) Biofilm formation capacity of Salmonella serotypes at different temperature conditions. Pesq Vet Bras 38:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown PK, Dozois CM, Nickerson CA, Zuppardo A, Terlange J, Curtiss R 3rd (2001) MlrA, a novel regulator of curli (AgF) and extracellular matrix synthesis by Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 41:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castelijn GA, van der Veen S, Zwietering MH, Moezelaar R, Abee T (2012) Diversity in biofilm formation and production of curli fimbriae and cellulose of Salmonella Typhimurium strains of different origin in high and low nutrient medium. Biofouling 28:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Virchow ınfections linked to garden of life raw meal organic shake & meal products (Final Update). https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/virchow-02-16/index.html. Accessed 2016 Apr 21
  8. Chandy JP, Angles ML (2001) Determination of nutrients limiting biofilm formation and the subsequent impact on disinfectant decay. Water Res 35:2677–2682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chmielewski RAN, Frank JF (2003) Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu C, Doublet B, Lee YL, Cloeckaert A, Chiou CS, Chen SW, Lin CW, Chiu CH (2012) Salmonella genomic island 1-J variants associated with change in the antibiotic resistance gene cluster in multıdrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Virchow isolated from humans, Taiwan, 2004–2006. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conover MS, Mishra M, Deora R (2011) Extracellular DNA is essential for maintaining Bordetella biofilm integrity on abiotic surfaces and in the upper respiratory tract of mice. PLoS One 6:e16861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costerton JW (1999) Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11:217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, LappinScott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawford RW, Reeve KE, Gunn JS (2010) Flagellated but not hyperfimbriated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium attaches to and forms biofilms on cholesterol-coated surfaces. J Bacteriol 192:2981–2990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crump JA, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ (2002) Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness. J Food Saf 35:859–865Google Scholar
  16. Davey ME, O’Toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:847–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2012) The European union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA J 10:2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finkel SE, Kolter R (2001) DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs. J Bacteriol 183:6288–6293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garip S, Bozoglu F, Severcan F (2007) Differentiation of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria with fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 61:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerstel U, Römling U (2001) Oxygen tension and nutrient starvation are major signals that regulate agfD promoter activity and expression of the multicellular morphotype in Salmonella typhimurium. Environ Microbiol 3:638–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerstel U, Römling U (2003) The csgD promoter, a control unit for biofilm formation in Salmonella Typhimurium. Res Microbiol 154:659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerstel U, Park C, Römling U (2003) Complex regulation of csgD promoter activity by global regulatory proteins. Mol Microbiol 49:639–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall-Stoodley L, Nistico L, Sambanthamoorthy K, Dice B, Nguyen D, Mershon WJ, Johnson C, Hu FZ, Stoodley P, Ehrlich GD, Post JC (2008) Characterization of biofilm matrix, degradation by DNase treatment and evidence of capsule down regulation in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates. BMC Microbiol 8:173.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammar M, Arnqvist A, Bian Z, Olsen A, Normark S (1995) Expression of two csg operons is required for production of fibronectin-and congo red-binding curli polymers in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol 18:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harmsen M, Lappann M, Knøchel S, Molin S (2010) Role of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2271–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helfer GA, Bock F, Marder L, Furtado JC, Costa AB, Ferrão MF (2015) Chemostat: exploratory multivariate data analysis software. Quim Nova 38:575–579Google Scholar
  27. Jensen PO, Givskov M, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C (2010) The immune system vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59:292–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karaca B, Akçelik N, Akçelik M (2013) Biofilm-producing abilities of Salmonella strains isolated from Turkey. Biologia 68:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolter R, Greenberg EP (2006) Microbial sciences: the superficial life of microbes. Nature 441:300–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lappann M, Claus H, van Alen T, Harmsen M, Elias J, Molin S, Vogel U (2010) A dual role of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation of Neisseria meningitides. Mol Microbiol 75:1355–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ledeboer NA, Jones BD (2005) Exopolysaccharide sugars contribute to biofilm formation by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on HEp–2 cells and chicken intestinal epithelium. J Bacteriol 187:3214–3226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I (2008) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev 43:134–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S (2010) Pseudomonas aeruginosa produces an extracellular deoxyribonuclease that is required for utilization of DNA as a nutrient source. Environ Microbiol 12:1621–1629Google Scholar
  34. Paytubi S, Cansado C, Madrid C, Balsalobre C (2017) Nutrient composition promotes switching between pellicle and bottom biofilm in Salmonella. Front Microbiol 8:2160.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piras F, Fois F, Consolati SG, Mazza R, Mazzette R (2015) Influence of temperature, source and serotype on biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica isolates from pig slaughterhouses. J Food Prot 78:1875–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prouty AM, Schwesinger WH, Gunn JS (2002) Biofilm formation and interaction with the surfaces of gallstones by Salmonella spp. Infect Immun 70:2640–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Römling U, Rodhe M (1999) Flagella modulate the multicellular behavior of Salmonella Typhimurium on the community level. FEMS Microbiol Lett 180:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Römling U, Sierralta WD, Eriksson K, Normark S (1998a) Multicellular and aggregative behaviour of Salmonella Typhimurium strains is controlled by mutations in the agfD promoter. Mol Microbiol 28:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Römling U, Bian Z, Hammar M, Sierralta WD, Normark S (1998b) Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol 180:722–731Google Scholar
  40. Römling U, Rodhe M, Olsen A, Normark S, Reinkoster J (2000) Agf D, the checkpoint of multicellular and aggregative behavior in Salmonella typhimurium regulates at least two independent pathways. Mol Microbiol 36:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Römling U, Bokranz W, Rabsch W, Zogaj X, Nimtz M, Tschape H (2003) Occurrence and regulation of the multicellular morphotype in Salmonella serovars important in human disease. Int J Med Microbiol 293:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Römling U, Persen D, Yaron S (2007) Biofilms of Salmonella enterica. In: Rhen M, Maskell D, Mastroeni P, Threlfall EJ (eds) Salmonella molecular biology and pathogenesis, Norfolk: 4K. Harizon Press, Chennai, pp 127–145Google Scholar
  43. Sauer K, Rickard AH, Davies DG (2007) Biofilm and biocomplexity. Features 2:347–353Google Scholar
  44. Schmitt J, Flemming HC (1998) FTIR-spectroscopy in microbial and material analysis. Int Biodeter Biodegr 41:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Severcan F, Akkas SB, Turker S, Yucel R (2012) Methodological approaches from experimental to computational analysis in vibrational spectroscopy and microspectroscopy. In: Severcan F, Haris PI (eds) Chapter 2, screening of proteins in cell and tissues by vibrational spectroscopy. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 12–52Google Scholar
  46. Shi X, Zhu X (2009) Biofilm formation and food safety in food industries. Trends Food Sci Technol 20:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simm R, Morr M, Kader A, Nimtz M, Römling U (2004) GGDEF and EAL domains inversely regulate cyclic di-GMP levels and transition from sessility to motility. Mol Microbiol 53:1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simoes M, Simoes LC, Vieira MJ (2010) A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sinde E, Carballo J (2000) Attachment of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, rubber and polytetrafluorethylene: the influence of free energy and the effect of commercial sanitizers. Food Microbiol 17:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Solano C, Garcia B, Valle J, Berasain C, Ghigo JM, Gamazo C, Lasa I (2002) Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose. Mol Microbiol 43:793–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solomon EB, Niemira BA, Sapers GM, Annous BA (2005) Biofilm formation, cellulose production, and curli biosynthesis by Salmonella originating from produce, animal, and clinical sources. J Food Protect 68:906–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spoering AL, Gilmore MS (2006) Quorum sensing and DNA release in bacterial biofilms. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spoering AS, Lewis K (2001) Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobial. J Bacteriol 183:6746–6751.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.23.6746-6751.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steenackers H, Hermans K, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ (2012) Salmonella biofilms: an overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Res Int 45:502–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stepanovic S, Cirkovic I, Mijac V, Svabic-Vlahovic M (2003) Influence of the incubation temperature, atmosphere and dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. Food Microbiol 20:339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stepanovic S, Cirkovic I, Ranin L, Svabic-Vlahovic M (2004) Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teiveira P, Lima JC, Azeredo J, Oliveira R (2007) Note. Colonisation of bench cover materials by Salmonella Typhimurium. Food Sci Tech Int.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013207075157 Google Scholar
  58. Teplitski M, Barak JD, Schneider KR (2009) Human enteric pathogens in produce: un-answered ecological questions with direct implications for food safety. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vestby LK, Moretro T, Langsrud S, Heir E, Nesse LL (2009) Biofilm forming abilities of Salmonella are correlated with persistence in fish meal- and feed factories. BMC Vet Res 5:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang H, Huang Y, Shuyan W, Li Y, Ye Y, Zheng Y, Huang R (2013) Extracellular DNA inhibits Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Typhi biofilm development on abiotic surfaces. Curr Microbiol 68:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weinberger M, Solnik-Isaac H, Shackar D, Reisfeld A, Valinsky L, Andorn N, Agmon V, Yishai R, Bassal R, Fraser A, Yaron S, Cohen D (2006) Salmonella enterica serotype Virchow: epidemiology, resistance patterns and molecular characterization of an invasive Salmonella serotype in Israel. Clin Microbiol Infect 12:999–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295:1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. White AP, Gibson DL, Kim W, Kay WW, Surette MG (2006) Thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose enhance long-term survival and persistence of Salmonella. J Bacteriol 188:3219–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White AP, Gibson DL, Grassl GA, Kay WW, Finlay BB, Vallance BA, Surette MG (2008) Aggregation via the red, dry and rough morphotype is not a virulence adaptation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun 76:1048–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yener İlçe B, Akçelik N (2015) The effect of marT gene on biofilm production of Salmonella Typhimurium. Turk J Biol. 39:722–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zogaj X, Bokranz W, Nimtz M, Römling U (2003) Production of cellulose and curli fimbriae by members of the family enterobacteriaceae isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 71:4151–4158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology InstituteAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Biology and GeneticsNevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli UniversityNevşehirTurkey
  3. 3.Biology Department, Faculty of ScienceAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations