Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 201, Issue 2, pp 155–161 | Cite as

Sphingobium aromaticivastans sp. nov., a novel aniline- and benzene-degrading, and antimicrobial compound producing bacterium

  • Tuan Manh Nguyen
  • Jaisoo KimEmail author
Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

A strictly aerobic, orange-pigmented strain was isolated and designated as UCM-25T. This strain is capable of degrading aniline and benzene, while is also producing antimicrobial compounds which inhibit the growth of some common pathogenic microbes. A near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed similarity to Sphingobium chlorophenolicum NBRC 16172T (98.6%). The level of DNA–DNA hybridization between the new isolate and the related species suggests UCM-25T to be a new species belonging to the genus Sphingobium. The bacterial cells contained phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingoglycolipid, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine, phosphatidyldimethylethanolamine, three unidentified polar lipids, and an unidentified aminophospholipid. Ubiquinone Q-10 was the major quinone and spermidine was the major polyamine. The G+C content in the DNA of strain UCM-25T was 62.9 mol%. Cells contained summed feature 8 (C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c), summed feature 3 (C16:1ω7c and/or C16:1ω6c), C16:0, and C14:0 2-OH as major fatty acids. Based on the comparison of phenotypic, genotypic, and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain UCM-25T represents a new member of the genus Sphingobium, for which the name S. aromaticivastans sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is UCM-25T (=KACC 19288T =DSM 105181T).

Keywords

Sphingobium aromaticivastans sp. nov. Soil Degradation Aromatic hydrocarbon Antimicrobial compound 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1A09916982).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This study does not describe any experimental work related to humans.

Supplementary material

203_2018_1611_MOESM1_ESM.docx (123 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 123 KB)

References

  1. Baek SH, Lim JH, Lee ST (2010) Sphingobium vulgare sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2473–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Busse HJ, Bunkia S, Hensel A, Lubitz W (1997) Discrimination of members of the family Pasteurellaceae based on polyamine patterns. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:698–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Denner EBM (1999) Chemotaxonomic characterization of Sphingomonas. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 23:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Wang H, Xu J, Song D, Sun G, Xu M (2016) Sphingobium hydrophobicum sp. nov., a hydrophobic bacterium isolated from electronic-waste-contaminated sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:3912–3916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2012) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard—9th edition, CLSI document M07-A9 (ISBN 1-56238-783-9), vol. 32. PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunliffe M, Kertesz MA (2006) Effect of Sphingobium yanoikuyae B1 inoculation on bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in aged and freshly PAH-contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 144:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dadhwal M, Jit S, Kumari H, Lal R (2009) Sphingobium chinhatense sp. nov., a hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-degrading bacterium isolated from an HCH dumpsite. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:3140–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E (1989) Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Soc Study Evol 39:1–15Google Scholar
  10. Felsentein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 20:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo P, Wang BZ, Hang BJ, Li L, Li SP, He J (2010) Sphingobium faniae sp. nov., a pyrethroid-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge treating wastewater from pyrethroid manufacture. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:408–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiao S, Chen W, Wang E, Wang J, Liu Z, Li YK, Wei G (2016) Microbial succession in response to pollutants in batch-enrichment culture. Sci Rep 6:21791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J (2012) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumari H, Gupta SK, Jindal S, Katoch P, Lal R (2009) Sphingobium lactosutens sp. nov., isolated from a hexachlorocyclohexane dump site and Sphingobium abikonense sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2291–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175Google Scholar
  20. Li L, Liu H, Shi Z, Wang G (2013) Sphingobium cupriresistens sp. nov., a copper-resistant bacterium isolated from copper mine soil, and emended description of the genus Sphingobium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:604–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB (1989) Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, Schaal A, Parlett JH (1984) An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 2:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NCCLS (2002) Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, 2nd edition (NCCLS). NCCLS document M27-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-469-4), vol 22. PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  24. Nguyen TM, Kim J (2016a) Rhodococcus pedocola sp. nov. and Rhodococcus humicola sp. nov., two antibiotic-producing actinomycetes isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2362–2369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen TM, Kim J (2016b) Flavobacterium fulvum sp. nov., Flavobacterium pedocola sp. nov. and Flavobacterium humicola sp. nov., three new members of the family Flavobacteriaceae, isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:3108–3118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen TM, Kim J (2017) A rapid and simple method for identifying bacterial polar lipid components in wet biomass. J Microbiol 55:635–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nishida H, Tokiwa Y (1993) Distribution of poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(ε-caprolactone) aerobic degrading microorganisms in different environments. J Environ Polym Degrad 1:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pal R, Bala S, Dadhwal M, Kumar M, Dhingra G, Prakash O, Prabagaran SR, Shivaji S, Cullum J, Holliger C, Lal R (2005) Hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterial strains Sphingomonas paucimobilis B90A, UT26 and Sp+, having similar lin genes, represent three distinct species, Sphingobium indicum sp. nov., Sphingobium japonicum sp. nov. and Sphingobium francense sp. nov., and reclassification of [Sphingomonas] chungbukensis as Sphingobium chungbukense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1965–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pitcher DG, Saunders NA, Owen RJ (1989) Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 8:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rohde M (2011) Microscopy. In: Rainey F, Oren A (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol 38, 1st edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 61–100Google Scholar
  31. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
  32. Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. MIDI Inc., NewarkGoogle Scholar
  33. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33:152–155Google Scholar
  34. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A (2001) Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1405–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ushiba Y, Takahara Y, Ohta H (2003) Sphingobium amiense sp. nov., a novel nonylphenol-degrading bacterium isolated from a river sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:2045–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaz-Moreira I, Faria C, Lopes AR, Svensson L, Falsen E, Moore ER, Ferreira AC, Nunes OC, Manaia CM (2009) Sphingobium vermicomposti sp. nov., isolated from vermicompost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:3145–3149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore LH, Moore WEC, Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E, Starr MP, Grüper HG (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 37:463–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wittich RM, Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Tiirola M, Wieser M, Macedo AJ, Abraham WR (2007) Sphingobium aromaticiconvertens sp. nov., a xenobiotic-compound-degrading bacterium from polluted river sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:306–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang J, Lang ZF, Zheng JW, Hang BJ, Duan XQ, He J, Li SP (2012) Sphingobium jiangsuense sp. nov., a 3-phenoxybenzoic acid-degrading bacterium isolated from a wastewater treatment system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:800–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Life Science, College of Natural SciencesKyonggi UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and ForestryThai NguyenVietnam

Personalised recommendations