Advertisement

A dual-mode cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter for improving THD

  • Roy FrancisEmail author
  • D. Meganathan
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Conventionally, multilevel inverters utilise multi-carrier pulse width modulation or multi-stepped (staircase) modulation to produce high-power quality waveforms. Though multi-carrier modulation schemes reduce total harmonic distortion (THD), they lead to considerable switching loss at higher modulation indexes. The staircase modulation, which operates at low switching frequencies, has a limitation of excessive high THD at low modulation indexes, making it unsuitable at lower modulation indexes. The proposed modulation technique blends the advantages of multi-carrier pulse width modulation and staircase modulation to improve the THD and reduce the switching losses over a wide range of modulation indexes. The proposed multilevel inverter employs a modified level-shifted multi-carrier modulation at lower modulation indexes and shifts to sinusoidally approximated multi-stepped at moderate and higher modulation indexes. The carrier frequency of the multi-carrier modulation is varied according to the switching loss analysis to further enhance the THD. A 1 KW prototype was built to confirm the practicality of the proposed method.

Keywords

Asymmetric cascaded H-bridge Field programmable gate arrays Multi-carrier modulation Multi-stepped modulation and switching loss 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express sincere gratitude to Dr. Jaison Mathew, Associate professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Government Engineering College Thrissur, for his invaluable help in the hardware design of the circuit.

References

  1. 1.
    Nabae A, Takahashi I, Akagi H (1981) A new neutral-point-clamped PWM inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 5:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kouro S, Malinowski M, Gopakumar K, Pou J, Franquelo LG, Wu B, Rodriguez J, Pérez MA, Leon JI (2010) Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(8):2553–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodriguez J, Lai JS, Peng FZ (2002) Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(4):724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saxena H, Singh A, Rai J (2018) Design and performance analysis of generalized integrator-based controller for grid connected PV system. Int J Electron 105(7):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander Stonier A (2017) Design and development of high performance solar photovoltaic inverter with advanced modulation techniques to improve power quality. Int J Electron 104(2):174–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tolbert LM, Habetler TG (1999) Novel multilevel inverter carrier-based PWM method. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 35(5):1098–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malinowski M, Gopakumar K, Rodriguez J, Perez MA (2010) A survey on cascaded multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(7):2197–2206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu B, Narimani M (2017) High-power converters and AC drives, vol 59. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dixon J, Moran L (2006) High-level multistep inverter optimization using a minimum number of power transistors. IEEE Trans Power Electron 21(2):330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Babaei E, Laali S, Bayat Z (2015) A single-phase cascaded multilevel inverter based on a new basic unit with reduced number of power switches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(2):922–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kangarlu MF, Babaei E (2013) A generalized cascaded multilevel inverter using series connection of sub multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(2):625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pereda J, Dixon J (2011) High-frequency link: a solution for using only one DC source in asymmetric cascaded multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(9):3884–3892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsang KM, Chan WL (2012) 27-Level DC–AC inverter with single energy source. Energy Convers Manag 53(1):99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaarthik RS, Gopakumar K, Mathew J, Undeland T (2015) Medium-voltage drive for induction machine with multilevel dodecagonal voltage space vectors with symmetric triangles. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(1):79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McGrath BP, Holmes DG (2002) Multicarrier PWM strategies for multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(4):858–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mokhberdoran A, Ajami A (2014) Symmetric and asymmetric design and implementation of new cascaded multilevel inverter topology. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(12):6712–6724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perez MA, Cortés P, Rodríguez J (2008) Predictive control algorithm technique for multilevel asymmetric cascaded H-bridge inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55(12):4354–4361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Francis R, Meganathan D (2016) Efficient 81-level sinusoidal and modified sinusoidal multi-stepped inverter. In: 8th IET international conference on power electronics machines and drives (PEMD 2016), pp 1–6. IETGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Francis R, Meganathan D (2018) An improved ANFIS with aid of ALO technique for THD minimization of multilevel inverters. J Circuits Syst Comput 27(12):1850193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maswood AI (2008) A switching loss study in spwm IGBT inverter. In: IEEE 2nd International power and energy conference (PECon 2008), pp 609–613Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salami A, Bayat B (2013) Total harmonic distortion minimization of multilevel converters using genetic algorithms. Appl Math 4(07):1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alimeling JH, Hammer WP (1999) PLECS-piece-wise linear electrical circuit simulation for Simulink. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 international conference on power electronics and drive systems. PEDS’99 (Cat. No. 99TH8475), vol 1, pp 355–360Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohan N, Undeland TM (2007) Power electronics: converters, applications, and design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cordesses L (2004) Direct digital synthesis: a tool for periodic wave generation (part 1). IEEE Signal Process Mag 21(4):50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Un E, Hava AM (2007) A near state PWM method with reduced switching frequency and reduced common mode voltage for three-phase voltage source inverters. In; 2007 IEEE international electric machines and drives conference, vol 1, pp 235–240Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duffey CK, Stratford RP (1989) Update of harmonic standard IEEE-519: IEEE recommended practices and requirements for harmonic control in electric power systems. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 25(6):1025–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Du Z, Tolbert LM, Ozpineci B, Chiasson JN (2009) Fundamental frequency switching strategies of a seven-level hybrid cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter. IEEE Trans Power Electron 24(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringGovernment Engineering CollegeTrichurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics EngineeringAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations