Advertisement

Near approximations in groups

  • Nurettin BağırmazEmail author
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we firstly introduce the notion of a near approximations in a group, which is an extended notion of a rough approximations in a group. Then we define lower and upper near subgroups based on normal subgroups in a group and give some properties of such subgroups. Furthermore, we obtain a comparison between these types of approximations and the approximation introduced by Kuroki and Wang (Inf Sci 90:203–220, 1996).

Keywords

Near sets Rough sets Near subgroups Near approximations 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03E99 20A05 20N99 

References

  1. 1.
    Abd El-Monsef, M.E., Abu-Donia, H.M., Marei, E.A.: Special Approach to Near Set Theory. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bağırmaz, N., Özcan, A.F.: Rough semigroups on approximation spaces. Int. J. Algebra 9, 339–350 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bağırmaz, N.: Near ideals in near semigroups. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 11(2), 505–516 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biswas, R., Nanda, N.: Rough groups and rough subgroups. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 42, 251–254 (1994)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonikowaski, Z.: Algebraic structures of rough sets. In: Ziarko, W.P. (ed.) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 242–247. Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, W., Mo, Z., Wang, J.: Notes on “the lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group” and “rough ideals in semigroups”. Inf. Sci. 177, 5134–5140 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davvaz, B.: Roughness in rings. Inf. Sci. 164, 147–163 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwinski, T.: Algebraic approach to rough sets. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 35, 673–683 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    İnan, E., Öztürk, M.: Near groups on nearness approximation spaces. Hacettepe J. Math. Stat. 4, 545–558 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    İnan, E., Öztürk, M.: Near semigroups on nearness approximation spaces. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 10(2), 287–297 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuroki, N., Wang, P.P.: The lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group. Inf. Sci. 90, 203–220 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuroki, N.: Rough ideals in semigroups. Inf. Sci. 100, 139–163 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, F., Zhang, Z.: The Homomorphisms and operations of rough groups. Sci. World J. 2014, Article ID 507972 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miao, D., Han, S., Li, D., Sun, L.: Rough group, rough subgroup and their properties. In: Ślkezak, D., et al. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2005, LNAI 3641, pp. 104–113. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Özcan, A.F., Bağırmaz, N.: Comparison of near sets by means of a chain of features. Hacettepe J. Math. Stat. 45(1), 69–76 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rough sets and Boolean reasoning. Inf. Sci. 177, 41–73 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets and intelligent data analysis. Inf. Sci. 147, 1–12 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rudiments of rough sets. Inf. Sci. 177, 3–27 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pawlak, Z.: Classification of Objects by means of Attributes, Institute for Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Report 429 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters, J.F.: Near sets, general theory about nearness of objects. Appl. Math. Sci. 1(53), 2609–2629 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peters, J.F., Wasilewsk, P.: Foundations of near sets. Inf. Sci. 179, 3091–3109 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters, J.F.: Classification of perceptual objects by means of features. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Intell. Comput. 3(2), 1–35 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peters, J.F.: Fuzzy sets, near sets, and rough sets for your computational intelligence toolbox. Found. Comput. Intell. 2, 3–25 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peters, J.F., Ramanna, R.: Feature selection: a near set approach. In: ECML & PKDD Workshop on Mining Complex Data, Warsaw, pp. 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peters, J.F., Naimpally, S.: Applications of near sets. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 59(4), 536–542 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peters, J.F., Pal, S.K.: Cantor, fuzzy, near, and rough sets in image analysis. In: Pal, S.K., Peters, J.F. (eds.) Rough Fuzzy Image Analysis: Foundations and Methodologies, pp. 1.1–1.16. CRC Pres, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peters, J.F.: Local near sets: pattern discovery in proximity spaces. Math. Comput. Sci. 7(1), 87–106 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereology: a new paradigm for approximate reasoning. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 15(4), 333–365 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pomykala, J., Pomykala, J.A.: The stone algebra of rough sets. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 36, 495–508 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taşbozan, H., İçen, İ., Bağırmaz, N., Özcan, A.F.: Soft sets and soft topology on nearness approximation spaces. Filomat 31(13), 4117–4125 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, C., Chen, D., Hu, Q.: On rough approximations of groups. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyber. 4(5), 445–449 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang, C., Chen, D.: A short note on some properties of rough groups. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 431–436 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang, Z., Shu, L.: The lower and upper approximations in a group. Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 6, 158–162 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, Q., Zhan, J., Borzooei, R.A.: A study on soft rough semigroups and corresponding decision making applications. Open Math. 15, 1400–1413 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wolski, W.: Perception and classification. A note on near sets and rough sets. Found. Inform. 101, 143–155 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mardin Artuklu UniversityMardinTurkey

Personalised recommendations