Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review
- 102 Downloads
Various mechanical and biomechanical test systems to evaluate the effectiveness of hip protectors designed to prevent hip fracture as a result of falls were examined in this review. The articles considered were selected systematically. The effect of differences in design criteria was demonstrated, and it was observed that the impact energy employed during testing dramatically affects the performance of the hip protector. Over the past three decades, researchers have continuously experimented with various systems to determine the efficacy of various hip protectors. The primary aim has been to make informed decisions in optimizing hip protector design. This article provides a systematic review of various test systems employed in the determination of the biomechanical efficacy of hip protectors. A systematic literature search was carried out, and 28 relevant articles were included to demonstrate the effect of test systems in the evaluation of the biomechanical effectiveness of hip protectors. Methodological studies illustrated the appropriate use of impact testing systems for the simulation of hip anatomy and fall dynamics in evaluating the effectiveness of hip protectors in preventing a hip fracture. This systematic review has demonstrated the effect of the variability of test systems on the evaluation of impact attenuation by various hip protectors. The lack of standardized test systems accounts for the inconsistencies in the test results of the efficacy of hip protectors. This has been a major challenge in the efforts of researchers to optimize the interventions. The standardization of test systems may require needed improvements immediately as opposed to the development of new interventions in order to ensure that only hip protectors with adequately proven efficacies are deployed for clinical trials or for the protection of the hips of vulnerable individuals from sideways impact.
KeywordsBiomechanical effectiveness Fracture Hip protector Hip pad Mechanical testing Osteoporotic hip
Special thanks to the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) and the University of Ilorin, Nigeria, for the TETF/ES/UNI/ILORIN/ASTD/2017 intervention.
Financial support provided under the USM grant 1001/PMEKANIK/8014070.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 21.Holzer LA, Holzer G (2007) Design: a neglected factor in medicine. McGill J Med 10(3)Google Scholar
- 23.Lee T, Hwang DG, Ogihara N, Ito K (2017) The use of shear thickening polymer as a hip protector. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS IEEE, pp 1633–1635Google Scholar
- 24.Kiel DP, Magaziner J, Zimmerman S, Ball L, Barton BA, Brown KM, Stone JP, Dewkett D, Birge SJ (2007) Efficacy of a hip protector to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents: the HIP PRO randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 298:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.4.413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Santesso N, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R (2014) Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:1–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001255.pub5
- 29.Parkkari J, Kannus P, Palvanen M, Natri A, Vainio J, Aho H, Vuori I, Järvinen M (1999) Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int 65:183–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900679 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Robinovitch SN, Evans SL, Minns J, Laing AC, Kannus P, Cripton PA, Derler S, Birge SJ, Plant D, Cameron ID, Kiel DP, Howland J, Khan K, Lauritzen JB (2009) Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing-an international consensus statement (part I). Osteoporos Int 20:1977–1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1045-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Srewaradachpisal S, Tangtrakulwanich B, Dechwayukul C, Wongsiri S (2011) Hip protectors : comparative study of FEM simulation and testing. In: The Second TSME International Conference on Mechanical Engineering. TSME, Krabi, p BME09Google Scholar
- 43.Mills NJ (2007) Chapter 17 - hip protector case study. Polym Foam Handb:403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075068069-1/50018-0
- 44.Laing AC, Robinovitch SN (2008) The force attenuation provided by hip protectors depends on impact velocity, pelvic size, and soft tissue stiffness. J Biomech Eng 130:061005–1–061005–9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2979867
- 63.Zhang T, Song Y, Gao S (2011) Research on the characteristics of buffer material used as hip protector. In: 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE 2011. IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
- 65.Laing AC, Feldman F, Jalili M, Tsai CM(J), Robinovitch SN (2011) The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors. J Biomech 44:2627–2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 70.Smith KE, Parks SS, Hyjek MA, Downey SE, Gall K (2009) The effect of the glass transition temperature on the toughness of photopolymerizable (meth)acrylate networks under physiological conditions. Polymer (Guildf) 50:5112–5123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.040 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar