Intervals between bone mineral density testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in clinical practice
Intervals between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were evaluated in a large cohort of typical clinical practice. Intensive DXA scanning (intervals < 23 months) decreased substantially, from 16.7% in 2006 to 6.7% in 2015.
Serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements are suggested for patients at high risk of fractures. However, little is known about how often DXA testing occurs in clinical practice.
We examined time intervals between DXA testing for monitoring purpose at two academic medical centers in the US between 2004 and 2017. The primary outcome was the presence of testing intervals < 23 months (termed “intensive DXA testing”). A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate the association between selected patient-level clinical factors and intensive DXA testing.
Forty-nine thousand four hundred ninety-four DXA tests from 20,200 patients were analyzed. The mean time interval between scans was 36 ± 21 months. Only 11.1% of the repeated DXA testing met the criterion for intensive testing. The percentage of intensive DXA testing dropped from 16.7% in 2006 to 6.7% in 2015 (p for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, number of outpatient visits, and calendar year, correlates of intensive DXA testing included a baseline T-score < −2.5 at any anatomic site (OR, 4.8; 95%CI, 4.0–5.7), active use of drugs for osteoporosis (OR, 1.6; 95%CI, 1.3–1.9), and active use of glucocorticoids (OR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.2–1.4).
The predictors of intensive DXA testing suggest that this practice is used preferentially in patients with multiple risk factors and to monitor the response to pharmacotherapy. However, intensive DXA testing has become less common in real-world clinical practice over the last decade. Further studies are required to better define the optimal use of bone mineral density testing in this vulnerable population.
KeywordsDual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Osteoporosis Repeated scan Short interval
This work was supported by the NIH-P30-AR072577 (VERITY). HL received scholarship from Chinese PLA General Hospital. KY received financial support for his doctoral study from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (partially supported by training grants from Takeda, Pfizer, Bayer, and ASISA) and Honjo International Scholarship Foundation. SKT received support from the Lupus Foundation of America Career Development Award. DHS receives salary support from NIH-K24AR055989.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
- 2.International Society for Clinical Densitometry (2015) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. https://iscd.app.box.com/v/OP-ISCD-2015-Adult. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
- 3.Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Clarke BL, Harris ST, Hurley DL, Kleerekoper M, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Narula HS, Pessah-Pollack R, Tangpricha V, Wimalawansa SJ, Watts NB (2016) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 22:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.International Society for Clinical Densitometry Comment on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Calendar Year (CY) 2017 Hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system policy changes, Quality Provisions, and Payment Rates Proposed Rule (CMS-1656-P)Google Scholar
- 10.Zhang J, Delzell E, Zhao H, Laster AJ, Saag KG, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA, Wright NC, Yun H, Curtis JR (2012) Central DXA utilization shifts from office-based to hospital-based settings among medicare beneficiaries in the wake of reimbursement changes. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 27:858–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Nelson HD, Morris CD, Kraemer DF, et al (2001) Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: diagnosis and monitoring: summary. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)Google Scholar
- 17.Schott AM, Ganne C, Hans D, Monnier G, Gauchoux R, Krieg MA, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ, Colin C (2007) Which screening strategy using BMD measurements would be most cost effective for hip fracture prevention in elderly women? A decision analysis based on a Markov model. Osteoporos Int 18:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar