Comparison of hospitalised trends, treatment cost and health outcomes of fall-related hip fracture for people aged ≥ 65 years living in residential aged care and the community
This study compared hip fracture rates and health outcomes of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) to the community. The RACF resident age-standardised hospitalisation rate was five times higher than the community rate and declining. RACF residents experience overall worse health outcomes and survival post-hip fracture.
To compare hospitalisation trends, characteristics and health outcomes following a fall-related hip fracture of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) to older people living in the community.
A retrospective analysis of fall-related hip fracture hospitalisations of people aged ≥ 65 years during 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2013 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia’s largest populated state. Linked hospitalisation, RACF and Aged Care Assessment Appraisal data collections were examined. Negative binomial regression examined the significance of hospitalisation temporal trends.
There were 28,897 hip fracture hospitalisations. One-third were of older people living in RACFs. The hospitalisation rate was 2180 per 100,000 (95%CI: 2097.0–2263.7) for RACF residents and 390 per 100,000 (95%CI 384.8–395.8) for older people living in the community. The hospitalisation rate for RACF residents was estimated to decline by 2.9% annually (95%CI: − 4.3 to − 1.5). Hospital treatment cost for hip fractures was AUD$958.5 million. Compared to older people living in the community, a higher proportion of RACF residents were aged ≥ 90 years (36.1% vs 17.2%), were female (75.3% vs 71.8%), had > 1 Charlson comorbidity (37.6% vs 35.6%) and 58.2% had dementia (vs 14.4%). RACF residents had fewer in-hospital rehabilitation episodes (18.7% vs 60.9%) and a higher proportion of unplanned readmissions (10.6% vs 9.1%) and in-hospital mortality (5.9% vs 3.3%) compared to older people living in the community.
RACF residents are a vulnerable cohort of older people who experience worse health outcomes and survival post-hip fracture than older people living in the community. Whether access to individualised hip fracture rehabilitation for RACF residents could improve their health outcomes should be examined.
KeywordsCommunity Hip fracture Hospitalisation Residential aged care
The authors wish to thank the NSW Ministry of Health for providing access to the NSW hospitalisation data, the National Aged Care Data Clearinghouse for providing access to the Residential Aged Care and the Aged Care Assessment Program data, and the CHeReL for hospitalisation data extraction and the AIHW Data Linkage Unit for conducting the record linkage. The data were analysed within the Secure Unified Research Environment.
This research was funded by the Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration. R. Mitchell was supported by a career fellowship from the NSW Ministry of Health under the NSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowships Scheme.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval was obtained from the NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2008/10/108) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Human Research Ethics Committee (2015/1/159).
Conflict of interest
- 8.World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009), Population by Age and Sex, Australian States and Territories. Catalogue no: 3201.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics: CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 16.Cryer C, Langley J, Stephenson S, Jarvis S, Edwards P (2002) Measure for measure: the quest for valid indicators of non-fatal injury incidence. Public Health 116:257–262Google Scholar
- 17.National Centre for Classification in Health (2006) ICD-10-AM, 5th edn. National Centre for Classification in Health, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 18.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Transition care for older people leaving hospital, 2005–06 to 2012–13. 2014. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 19.Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) User Guide. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 21.Department of Health and Ageing (2011) National hospital cost data collection: Hospital reference manual Round 14 (2009–2010). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 22.NSW Department of Health (2011) NSW costs of care standards 2009–10. NSW Department of Health, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 23.SAS Institute (2014) SAS: statistical software, version 9.4. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
- 24.Australian Bureau of Statistics, (2016) Australian demographic statistics. Cat. no. 3101.0, Canberra: ABSGoogle Scholar
- 25.National Aged Care Data (2018) Clearing House Residential admissions, 2008–09 to 2015–16. [cited 2018 21/6/2018]; Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/about-our-data/our-data-collections/national-aged-care-data-clearinghouse. Accessed 21/6/2018
- 26.SAS Institute (2012) In: SAS Institute (ed) The STDRATE Procedure, in SAS/STAT 9.2 User's guide, Cary, North Carolina, pp 7487–7559Google Scholar
- 27.Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016) Australian demographic statistics Catalogue No. 3101.0. Which population to use for age standardisation? 2013 [cited 7/3/2016]; Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/products/42479A8EF04E40EBCA257C430016EA3B?OpenDocument. Accessed 7/3/2016