Risk factors and prevalence of urinary incontinence in mid-life Singaporean women: the Integrated Women’s Health Program
- 15 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
The objective was to identify the prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI) in healthy midlife Singaporean women.
Healthy women, aged 45–69 years, were assessed for UI and sociodemographic characteristics, including ethnicity, menopausal status, parity, and body mass index (BMI). UI subtypes corresponding to stress (SUI) alone, urge (UUI) alone, mixed (MUI), and leakage (drops only) incontinence were classified using the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6). Risk factors were examined using Chi-squared tests, followed by sequential multivariate logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR and 95% confidence intervals).
A total of 1,119 women (mean age 56.2 ± 5.2) completed the UDI-6. 52.3% reported any UI; MUI and SUI were the most common, each affecting 20% of women. Post-menopausal women had a lower risk (aOR 0.5 [0.3–0.9]) of SUI, but a higher risk (aOR 4.4 [1.0–19.9]) of UUI compared with premenopausal women. Higher education was negatively associated (aOR 0.3 [0.2–0.7]) with UUI, but positively associated with MUI (aOR 2.3 [1.3–4.0]). Parity (1–2 children) increased the risk of SUI (aOR 1.8 [1.0–3.1]), but reduced the risk of UUI (aOR 0.4 [0.2–0.9]). Obesity was associated with increased risk for MUI (aOR 2.2 [1.4–3.4]) and leakage (aOR 2.0 [1.0–4.1]). Malays and Indians had a higher risk of MUI, having (aOR 2.1 (1.2–3.7) and 1.7 (1.1–2.7) respectively compared with Chinese, a difference mediated by higher BMI.
Urinary incontinence is a major morbidity prevalent in healthy midlife Asian women. Post-menopausal status, education level, parity, BMI (and its link with ethnicity) are independent risk factors in this population, and should be incorporated into counseling and targeted interventions.
KeywordsUrinary incontinence Prevalence Midlife Asian women Risk factors Urinary distress inventory 6 (UDI-6)
The authors would like to thank our study participants and all members of the IWHP who coordinated the study visits and performed data collection. We would also like to acknowledge contribution of Ms. Shamini Ganasarajah, who provided initial data analysis support.
This study was partially funded by a Singapore National Medical Research Council Grant (Number: CSASI16May007) to E.L. Yong.
This study was supported by Obstetrics and Gynecology Pitch for Fund Research Grant (OG PFFR FY 2014) from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University of Singapore.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A. Incontinence, 6th edition. Bristol: ICI-ICS International Continence Society. 2017.Google Scholar
- 3.Waetjen LE, Xing G, Johnson WO, Melnikow J, Gold EB; Study of Womenʼs Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Factors associated with reasons incontinent midlife women report for not seeking urinary incontinence treatment over 9 years across the menopausal transition. Menopause. 2018;25(1):29-37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Abrams P, Andersson KE, Apostolidis A, Birder L, Bliss D, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Castro-Diaz D, O'Connell P, Cottenden AJN. Urodynamics 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2271–2272.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Koelbl H, Nitti V, Baessler K, Salvatore S, Sultan A, Yamaguchi OJI. Committee 4: pathophysiology of urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, 4th edn. Paris: Health Publications. 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.Human Development Indices and Indicators—Statistical Update, 2018. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-indices-indicators-2018-statistical-update Accessed 27 July 2019.
- 7.Population structure. Singapore Department of Statistics, 2015. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/population-and-population-structure/latest-data.
- 9.Jennings JT. Social and economic characteristics of Americans during midlife, special studies series (no. 111). US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1981; p. 23.Google Scholar
- 11.Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC. How healthy are we?: a national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
- 12.Death and life expectancy. 2018. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/death-and-life-expectancy/latest-data Accessed 27 July 2019.
- 19.Waetjen LE, Liao S, Johnson WO, Sampselle CM, Sternfield B, Harlow SD, Gold EB. Factors associated with prevalent and incident urinary incontinence in a cohort of midlife women: a longitudinal analysis of data: study of women's health across the nation. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;165(3):309–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Botlero R, Davis SR, Urquhart DM, Shortreed S, Bell RJ. Age-specific prevalence of, and factors associated with, different types of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling Australian women assessed with a validated questionnaire. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):134–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Grady D, Brown JS, Vittinghoff E, Applegate W, Varner E, Snyder T, et al. Postmenopausal hormones and incontinence: the heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study. Gynecology. 2001;97(1):116–20.Google Scholar
- 27.Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Anderson G, Howard BV, Thomson CA, LaCroix AZ. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310(13):1353–68.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gartlehner G, Patel SV, Feltner C, Weber RP, Long R, Mullican K, Boland E, Lux L, Viswanathan M. Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal women: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2017;318(22):2234–49.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Hannestad Y, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar SJ; Norwegian EPINCONT study, Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 46.Sowers MFR, Crawford SL, Sternfeld B, Morganstein D, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Evans DA, Neer R, Matthews KA, Sherman S. SWAN: a multicenter, multiethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition. In Lobo RA, Kelsey J, Marcus R, editors. Menopause: biology and pathobiology. San Diego: Academic Press. 2000. pp. 175-88CrossRefGoogle Scholar