Advertisement

Parity and anal sphincter trauma

  • Yanping Li
  • Ka Lai ShekEmail author
  • Nishamini Subramaniam
  • Talia Friedman
  • Hans Peter Dietz
Original Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a form of maternal trauma secondary to vaginal birth. Women with a history of OASI are deemed to be at a higher risk of recurrence. However, it is unclear if multiparity is associated with higher prevalence. The aim of the study was to test the following hypothesis: the prevalence of external anal sphincter (EAS) tears diagnosed on transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is related to vaginal parity.

Methods

A retrospective observational study on 1,273 women who attended a tertiary urogynecology service between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients had undergone a standardized interview, clinical examination and 4D TPUS. Tomographic ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate the EAS, blinded to all clinical data.

Results

Of 1,273 women, 1,143 (90%) were vaginally parous, with a mean vaginal parity of 2 (range 1–8). Mean age was 54 (range 17–89) years. Anal incontinence was reported in 186 women (15%) with an average St Mark’s incontinence score of 12 (range 1–23). EAS defects on ultrasound were identified in 148 (12%). On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of EAS defects in vaginally primiparous and multiparous women (p = 0.460).

Conclusions

There is no significant difference in the prevalence of EAS tears between vaginally primiparous and multiparous women. This argues against additional traumatic effects of subsequent vaginal births.

Keywords

Anal sphincter trauma Anal incontinence Maternal trauma Parity Tomographic ultrasound imaging Transperineal ultrasound 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

KL Shek and HP Dietz have received unrestricted educational grants from GE Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Guzman Rojas RA, Shek KL, Langer SM, Dietz HP. Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:461–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harvey MA, Pierce M, Alter JE, et al. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): prevention, recognition, and repair. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(12):1131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turel FD, Langer S, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Medium- to long-term follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(3):348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu X, Menees SB, Zochowski MK, Fenner DE. Economic cost of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(5):586–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S. Risk factors of recurrent anal sphincter ruptures: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119(13):1640–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. II. Three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guzmán Rojas RA, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):363–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamisan Atan I, Lin S, Dietz HP, Herbison P, Wilson PD, ProLong Study Group. It is the first birth that does the damage: a cross-sectional study 20 years after delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(11):1637–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamisan Atan I, Gerges B, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The association between vaginal parity and hiatal dimensions: a retrospective observational study in a tertiary urogynaecological centre. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(6):867–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horak TA, Guzman-Rojas R, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma: does the second baby matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(1):90–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guzmán Rojas RA, Salvesen KÅ, Volløyhaug I. Anal sphincter defects and fecal incontinence 15–24 years after first delivery: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(5):677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Subramaniam N, Bienkiewicz J, Friedman T, Dietz HP. How repeatable are measures of anal sphincter trauma by exo-anal 4D ultrasound? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. 53(6):836-840.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20175.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ros C, Martínez-Franco E, Wozniak MM, et al. Postpartum two- and three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of anal sphincter complex in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):508–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yangpu HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Nepean Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Liverpool Clinical SchoolWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations