Use of multimedia during informed consent: novelty or necessity

  • Henry H. ChillEmail author
  • Uri Dior
  • David Shveiky
Clinical Opinion


The process of informed consent is an integral part of the preoperative encounter. In theory, it has the potential to educate patients, enabling them to reach a true autonomous decision regarding the treatment offered. Unfortunately, in recent years informed consent has become overly complicated for the average patient. Questions have been raised regarding the ability of the process, as practiced nowadays, to actually increase knowledge and achieve its goals. In search of new ways to increase patient comprehension, researchers have suggested use of multimedia during the process of informed consent. Visualization of complex ideas, interactive learning and tailoring the procedure to fit patient needs are all advantages presented by use of multimedia during the process. Several randomized prospective trials have looked into this topic and have presented promising data in favor of multimedia use. Informed consent is a process with unfulfilled potential, and use of multimedia may be part of the solution. In our opinion, it is time to change the way we educate patients.


Informed consent Multimedia Female pelvic medicine Patient education 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

H.H. Chill and U. Dior have no conflicts of interest. D. Shveiky serves on the medical advisory board of Escala Medical.


  1. 1.
    von Ephesos I. Historia ecclesiastica, vol III. Louvain: E W Brooks; 1964. p. 91–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feld AD. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:977–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Parker LS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Joint Commission Standard R1.01.03.01. 2009 hospital accreditation standards. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): The Commission. 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madeira JL, Andraka-Christou B. Paper trails, trailing behind: improving informed consent to IVF through multimedia applications. J Law Biosci. 2016;3(1):2–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W, et al. Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients’ recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir. 2000;142:233–8 discussion 238-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T. Digital multimedia: a new approach for informed consent? JAMA. 2015;313(5):463–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin PJ, Tilburt JC, Murad MH, McCormick JB. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willis G. Cognitive interviewing as a tool to improve the informed consent process. J Empir Res Hum Res. 2006;1:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis D. Computer-based approaches to improving patient education: a review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:272–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellett L, Villegas R, Beischer A, Ong N, Maher P. Use of a multimedia module to aid the informed consent process in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy for pelvic pain: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):602–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tipotsch-Maca SM, Varsits RM, Ginzel C, Vecsei-Marlovits PV. Effect of a multimedia-assisted informed consent procedure on the information gain, satisfaction, and anxiety of cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):110–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowers N, Eisenberg E, Montbriand J, Jaskolka J, Roche-Nagle G. Using a multimedia presentation to improve patient understanding and satisfaction with informed conset for minimally invasive vascular procedures. Surgeon. 2017;15(1):7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Madeira JL, Rehbein J, Christianson MS, et al. Using the EngagedMD multimedia platform to improve informed consent for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1338–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHadassah-Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations