Advertisement

De novo urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery—a national database study

  • Yasmine KhayyamiEmail author
  • Marlene Elmelund
  • Gunnar Lose
  • Niels Klarskov
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of de novo urinary incontinence (UI) after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.

Methods

Data from 2013 to 2016 were collected from the Danish Urogynecological Database, where registration for any urogynecological procedure performed in Denmark is mandatory. Inclusion criteria were urinary continent women who underwent POP surgery. A woman was urinary continent if her total score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-short form (ICIQ-UI-sf) was 0 and she answered ‘never’ to ‘When does urine leak?’ Postoperatively, the women were categorized as continent or women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) or undefined UI. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses. The included parameters were preoperative POP stage (POP-Q), compartment, BMI and age. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

We included 1198 women. The risk of de novo UI was 15%; 45% had SUI, 30% had UUI, 16% had MUI, and 10% had undefined UI. BMI was highly associated with de novo UI; the risk was 12% for women with BMI < 25, 16% for women with BMI 25 – < 30 and 23% for women with BMI ≥ 30. Age, compartment and POP stage were not associated with de novo UI.

Conclusions

The prevalence of de novo UI is the same regardless of the involved compartment/s and POP stage. BMI is significantly associated with de novo UI; twice as many women with BMI ≥ 30 had de novo UI compared with women with BMI < 25.

Keywords

De novo urinary incontinence Pelvic organ prolapse surgery The Danish Urogynecological Database 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Yasmine Khayyami has no disclosures. Marlene Elmelund has received paid travel expenses and honoraria from Contura outside the submitted work. Gunnar Lose has received honoraria as a consultant for Contura outside the submitted work. Niels Klarskov has received paid travel expenses from Contura outside the submitted work.

References

  1. 1.
    Mouritsen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(2):122–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Svenningsen R, Borstad E, Spydslaug AE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecology J. 2012;23(7):843–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alas AN, Chinthakanan O, Espaillat L, Plowright L, Davila GW, Aguilar VC. De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence. Int Urogynecology J. 2017;28(4):583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellström Engh AM, Ekeryd A, Magnusson Å, Olsson I, Otterlind L, Tobiasson G. Can de novo stress incontinence after anterior wall repair be predicted? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(5):488–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lensen EJM, Withagen MIJ, Kluivers KB, Milani AL, Vierhout ME. Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(5):455–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ennemoser S, Schönfeld M, von Bodungen V, Dian D, Friese K, Jundt K. Clinical relevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecology J. 2012;23(7):851–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco AG, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(15):1557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jundt K, Wagner S, von Bodungen V, Friese K, Peschers U. Occult incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse—does it matter? Eur J Med Res. 2010;15(3):112–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guldberg R, Brostrøm S, Hansen JK, Kærlev L, Gradel KO, Nørgård BM, et al. The Danish Urogynaecological database: establishment, completeness and validity. Int Urogynecology J. 2013;24(6):983–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Årsrapport nr 11. For Dugabase [internet]. [cited 2019 Feb 18]. Available from: http://dugabase.dk/wp_dugabase/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DugaBase_%C3%85RSRAPPORT-2016-FINAL.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Lond Engl. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osborn DJ, Strain M, Gomelsky A, Rothschild J, Dmochowski R. Obesity and female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2013;82(4):759–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khayyami Y, Lose G, Klarskov N. The urethral closure mechanism is deteriorated after anterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecology J. 2018;29(9):1311–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHerlev Gentofte University HospitalHerlevDenmark

Personalised recommendations