Advertisement

Factors in delay of diagnosis of gynecologic ureteral injuries at a rural academic hospital

  • Robert ShapiroEmail author
  • Kylie Fuller
  • Brian Wiseman
  • Christopher Bell
  • Gary Wu
  • Rahul Mannanl
  • Omar Duenas Garcia
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Ureteral injuries are a source of morbidity, and delays in diagnosis can increase the risk for long-term sequelae. Our aim was to quantify and describe iatrogenic ureteral injuries in a rural tertiary care center. Our secondary goal was to evaluate the impact of delayed diagnosis of ureteral injury on patient outcomes and whether cystoscopy had any influence on these outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was undertaken for ureteral injuries, identified by the ICD-9 code from 1997 to 2017 at West Virginia University (WVU) Hospital. Injuries were categorized by procedure, surgeon specialty, location (WVU versus community hospital), and intraoperative cystoscopy. A delay in diagnosis was defined as a ureteral injury sustained during surgery not diagnosed intraoperatively.

Results

Forty-six patients were identified with iatrogenic ureteral injury at WVU. Twenty-seven occurred during gynecologic procedures (59%). Fourteen ureteral injuries were sustained at community hospitals and transferred to WVU for evaluation and treatment. Fifty percent of those had a known delay in diagnosis. The average delay in diagnosis for transferred patients was 6.5 days vs. 3.6 days for patients with ureteral injury sustained at WVU. Cystoscopy was only utilized in 37% (10/27) of gynecologic cases involving a ureteral injury. When cystoscopy was utilized, it was 80% (8/10) effective in helping to identify ureteral injury.

Conclusions

Within a rural population, approximately half of patients with ureteral injuries were transferred to a tertiary care center for evaluation and treatment. Transferred patients were more likely to have a delay to diagnosis than patients who had injuries sustained at WVU. The delayed diagnosis patients had comparatively worse outcomes. Gynecologic surgeons working in rural hospitals should be adequately trained to perform diagnostic cystoscopy.

Keywords

Ureteral injury Genitourinary trauma Cystoscopy Iatrogenic 

Notes

Sources of funding and research support

West Virginia University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Elliott SP, Mcaninch JW. Ureteral injuries from external violence: the 25-year experience at San Francisco General Hospital. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1213–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Summerton DJ, Djakovic N, Kitrey ND et al. Guidelines on urological trauma. 2015. Available at: http://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-trauma/. Accessed Sept 2016.
  3. 3.
    Brandes S, Coburn M, Armenakas N, Mcaninch J. Diagnosis and management of ureteric injury: an evidence-based analysis. BJU Int. 2004;94(3):277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liapis A, Balkas P, Giannopoulus V, Creatsas G. Ureteral injuries during gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:391–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esparaz AM, et al. Iatrogenic urinary tract injuries: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Semin Interv Radiol. 2015;32(2):195–208 PMC. Web. 2 Sept. 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oh B, Kwon D, Park K, et al. Late presentation of ureteral injury after laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(3):337–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peacock L, Young A, Rogers R. Universal cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy: a debate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):75–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parpala-Spårman T, Paananen I, Santala M, Ohtonen P, Hellström P. Increasing numbers of ureteric injuries after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(5):422–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ostrzenski A. A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58(12):794 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2003. 0029-7828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Best CD, Petrone P, Buscarini M, et al. Traumatic ureteral injuries: a single institution experience validating the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-organ injury scale grading scale. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1202–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghali AM, El malik EM, Ibrahim AI, Ismail G, Rashid M. Ureteric injuries: diagnosis, management, and outcome. J Trauma. 1999;46(1):150–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selzman AA, Spirnak JP. Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries. J Urol. 1996;155(3):878–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilmour DT, Das S, Flowerdew G. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abboudi H, Ahmed K, Royle J, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, N'dow J. Ureteric injury: a challenging condition to diagnose and manage. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(2):108–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6(3):115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Current active Critical Access Hospitals Available AT: http://www.hca.wvu.gov. Last accessed in 2018.
  17. 17.
    Joynt K, Orav J, Jha A. Mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to critical access and non-critical access hospitals, 2002-2010. JAMA. 2013;309(13):1379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 701: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nieboer T, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Garry R, Van Voorst S, Mol B, Kluivers K. Surgicalapproach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
  20. 20.
    Chi AM, Curran DS, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Swenson CM. Universal cystoscopy after benign hysterectomy: examining the effects of an institutional policy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, Heikkinen AM, Kauko M, Makinen J, et al. FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1741e51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Makinen J, Heinonen PK, Kauko M, Tomas E, et al. Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a review and complications of 1165 operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:118e22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chan JK, Morrow J, Manetta A. Prevention of ureteral injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1273e7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Findley AD, Solnik MJ. Prevention and management of urologic injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:323e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharp HT, Adelman MR. Prevention, recognition, and management of urologic injuries during gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:1085e96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teeluckdharry B, Gilmour D, Flowerdew G. Urinary tract injury at benign gynecologic surgery and the role of cystoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:1161e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Shapiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kylie Fuller
    • 1
  • Brian Wiseman
    • 1
  • Christopher Bell
    • 1
  • Gary Wu
    • 1
  • Rahul Mannanl
    • 1
  • Omar Duenas Garcia
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of MedicineWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations