Advertisement

The impact of variations in obstetric practice on maternal birth trauma

  • Ixora Kamisan AtanEmail author
  • Shek Ka Lai
  • Suzanne Langer
  • Jessica Caudwell-Hall
  • Hans Peter Dietz
Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Forceps delivery and length of second stage are risk factors of maternal birth trauma, i.e., levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and anal sphincter trauma. The cesarean section (CS) rate has recently become the key performance indicator because of its increase worldwide. Attempts to reduce CS rates seem to have led to an increase in forceps deliveries and longer second stages. This study aimed to determine the association between variations in obstetric practice (between hospitals) and maternal birth trauma.

Methods

This was a retrospective ancillary analysis involving 660 nulliparous women carrying an uncomplicated singleton term pregnancy in a prospective perinatal intervention trial at two Australian tertiary obstetric units. They had been seen antenatally and at 3–6 months postpartum for a standardized clinical assessment between 2007 and 2014. Primary outcome measures were sonographically diagnosed LAM and external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma.

Results

The incidence of LAM avulsion (11.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.01) and composite trauma, i.e., LAM avulsion ± EAS injury (29.2% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.03) were higher in one of the two hospitals, where the forceps delivery rate was also higher (10.9% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.001). BMI (OR 0.9, P = 0.02), length of second stage (OR 1.01, P = 0.02) and forceps delivery (OR 5.24, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of the difference in LAM avulsion incidence between the hospitals. Maternal age (OR 1.06, P < 0.04) and forceps delivery (OR 8.66, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for composite trauma.

Conclusions

A higher incidence of LAM avulsion and composite trauma in one of the two hospitals was largely explained by a higher forceps delivery rate.

Keywords

Maternal birth trauma Levator trauma Levator avulsion OASIS Anal sphincter trauma Forceps delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rodrigo Guzman-Rojas, J Oliver Daly, Vivien Wong, Varisara Chatarasorn and Hala Phipps for their assistance in recruitment and/or data collection. This work was presented as an oral podium presentation at the 41st International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) Annual Meeting, Cape Town, South Africa, August 2016.

Funding

This study was unfunded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

KL Shek and HP Dietz have received unrestricted educational grants from GE Medical. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Details of ethics approval

The parent trial was approved by the Sydney West and Sydney South Area Health Service Human Research Ethics Committees (SWAHS HREC 07–022 and SSAHS HREC X09–0384) on 30 April 2007.

References

  1. 1.
    Dietz H, Pardey J, Murray H. Pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma should be key performance indicators of maternity services. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1485–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:707–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz H, Simpson J. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(8):979–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002;29(2):83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soerensen MM, Buntzen S, Bek KM, Laurberg S. Complete obstetric anal sphincter tear and risk of long-term fecal incontinence: a cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(8):992–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skinner EM, Dietz HP. Psychological and somatic sequelae of traumatic vaginal delivery: a literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;55(4):309–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodrigo N, Wong V, Shek KL, Martin A, Dietz HP. The use of 3-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor to predict recurrence risk after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;54(3):206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh R, Nath Trivedi A. Is the caesarean section rate a performance indicator of an obstetric unit? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(2):204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veillard J, Champagne F, Klazinga N, Kazandjian V, Arah O, Guisset A-L. A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(6):487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010–2011. Pediatrics. 2013:peds. 2012–3769.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, Rouse DJ. Obstetricians ACo, gynecologists. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1181.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dietz H, Shek K. Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: which levels matter most? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(6):698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guzman Rojas R, Shek K, Langer S, Dietz H. Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):461–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dietz HP, Wong V, Shek KL. A simplified method for determining hiatal biometry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;51(6):540–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dietz HP, Shek C, De Leon J, Steensma AB. Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;31:676–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Langer S, Guzman Rojas R, Caudwell-Hall J, Daly JO, et al. Does the Epi-no® birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(6):995–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dietz HP. Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(4):347–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth. 2006;33(2):117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hehir MP, O’Connor HD, Higgins S, Robson MS, McAuliffe FM, Boylan PC, et al. Obstetric anal sphincter injury, risk factors and method of delivery—an 8-year analysis across two tertiary referral centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(15):1514–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Type of birth (vaginal, Caesarean, forceps etc): Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. HealthStats NSW. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health. Available at: www.healthstats.nsw.gov.au. Accessed (12 September 2015) [Internet]. [cited 12 September 2015].
  25. 25.
    Treharne I, Esegbona G, Bloomfield T. Rotational forceps training needs to be scaled up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(5):641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama D. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(10):1277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A, Guzman Rojas R, Langer S, Shek C, et al. OC09. 05: intrapartum predictors of pelvic floor trauma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(S1):21–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard RW, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(8):1175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113(2):195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Medical School NepeanThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC)Kuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Liverpool Clinical SchoolUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations