Contributing factors in forceps associated pelvic floor trauma
- 40 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
Levator avulsion occurs in 10−35% of women after a first vaginal delivery, with forceps being the main risk factor. Three mechanisms have been proposed to account for the high risk of trauma: the additional space requirement, increased speed of distension, and/ or greater force. This study examines the additional space requirements associated with forceps to determine any associated increase in avulsion risk.
This was an in vitro simulation study of spatial requirements for delivery of a fetal head by forceps, with mathematical modelling of spatial requirements using data from a local observational study. A balloon device was used to model head circumferences through the range of expected measurements at term, with measurements taken after application of three different types of forceps. Each measurement was performed in triplicate.
On average, forceps increased the circumference of the fetal head by 1.01 cm for Wrigley’s, 1.04 cm for Kielland’s, and 1.64 cm for Neville-Barnes forceps, resulting in an estimated increase in the diameter of the fetal head by 0.32 cm, 0.33 cm, and 0.52 cm, respectively. This increase was linear throughout the tested range. In 534 singleton pregnancies at term, we determined an odds ratio (OR) of 1.11 per centimeter head circumference for avulsion. Hence, the additional space requirement due to forceps explains ORs of 1.11, 1.12, and 1.19 for avulsion, depending on forceps type.
The effect of forceps on avulsion risk is not fully explained by the increase in space requirement alone. Other factors, such as shortened time to maximum distension and/or increased peak force applied may contribute to the excess risk.
KeywordsBirth trauma Forceps Head circumference Levator avulsion Pelvic organ prolapse
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Professor Hans Peter Dietz has received unrestricted educational grants from GE Medical. The other authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare.
- 2.NSW Mothers and Babies 2015 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/hsnsw/Publications/mothers-and-babies-2015.pdf
- 17.Dietz HP. Obstetric forceps: a species on the brink of extinction simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma copyright a by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer H. 2016;128(6):1447–8.Google Scholar
- 18.Dietz HP, Shek KL, Callaghan S. Letter to the editor re: perinatal and maternal outcomes after training residents in forceps before vacuum instrumental birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):910.Google Scholar
- 20.Friedman T, Eslick G, Dietz H. Instrumental delivery and the risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI): a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(S1):S30–1.Google Scholar
- 21.Friedman T, Eslick G, Dietz H. Instrumental delivery and the risk of avulsion: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(S1):S26–7.Google Scholar
- 22.Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol Mosby, Inc. 2009;201:91 e1-91.e7.Google Scholar
- 28.Hoyte L, Damaser MS, Warfield SK, Chukkapalli G, Majumdar A, Choi DJ, et al. Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2).Google Scholar