Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England
- 115 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has significantly evolved with the introduction of synthetic midurethral slings (MUS). However, following reports from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission, the use of vaginal meshes in urogynaecology has been largely scrutinised. We analysed trends in female SUI surgery in England from 2000 to 2017.
The Hospital Episode Statistics database was retrieved from the Health and Social Care Information Centre website. Specific four-character codes of the evolving OPCS-4 coding system were used to quantify SUI operations.
We analysed 180,773 admissions from 2000 to 2017. A steep rise in MUS use was noted until 2008–2009, followed by a consistent drop, with a nadir of 6383 procedures in 2016–2017. Removal of MUS has become increasingly popular, with a peak of 591 in 2012–2013. Numbers for traditional continence operations remained low. Colposuspensions markedly decreased to 189 in 2012–2013, with a slight positive trend only in the last few years, while autologous sling use costantly dropped from 262 to 124 throughout the study period. Admissions for urethral bulking agents increased from 650 to 1324 in the last 2 years.
MUS represents the most commonly performed procedure for SUI, despite an obvious reduction in the last 8 years. Urethral bulking agents are becoming more popular, while the numbers of colposuspensions and autologous slings are still low. Training programmes should take into account current shifts in surgical practice.
KeywordsStress urinary incontinence Surgery Mesh Trends
No funding was received for this project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Martino Zacche does not have any conflict of interest. Sambit Mukhopadhyay accepted cover of travel expensed from Dynamesh, Astellas, Kebomed UK, and Cook Medical. Ilias Giarenis received speaker honoraria from Astellas.
- 3.Ward KL, Hilton P, Uk, Ireland TVTTG. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 2008;115(2):226–233.Google Scholar
- 5.Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD006375.Google Scholar
- 6.NICE. Urinary incontinence in women: management 2015. [Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg171/resources/urinary-incontinence-in-women-management-pdf-35109747194821.
- 8.Parliament. Update on the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review: Written statement-HCWS841 2018. [Available from: https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2018-07-10/HCWS841/.
- 14.Wu CJ, Tong YC, Hsiao SM, Liang CC, Liang SJ, Weng SF, et al. The surgical trends and time-frame comparison of primary surgery for stress urinary incontinence, 2006–2010 vs 1997–2005: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1683–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rac G, Younger A, Clemens JQ, Kobashi K, Khan A, Nitti V, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Brennand E, Ruiz-Mirazo E, Tang S, Kim-Fine S. Calgary Women's pelvic Health Research G. urinary leakage during exercise: problematic activities, adaptive behaviors, and interest in treatment for physically active Canadian women. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(4):497–503.Google Scholar
- 22.Kirchin V, Page T, Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody JD, McClinton S. Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD003881.Google Scholar