Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 307–312 | Cite as

Marital disruption among women with genital fistula in Nigeria: who is at greatest risk?

  • Steven N. ShephardEmail author
  • Oluwatobi V. Mamven
  • Eunjin Lee
  • Sunday J. Lengmang
Original Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Marital disruption is a commonly identified sequela of genital fistula in developing countries. This study is aimed at identifying factors that correlate with marital outcomes.

Methods

All new patients presenting to Evangel VVF Centre in Jos, Nigeria, between August 2015 and August 2017, were retrospectively reviewed with regard to demographics, medical history, and fistula details to identify variables correlating with marital status, particularly whether currently married or presently divorced, separated, or divorced and remarried (cumulatively the “divorce group”).

Results

Among 581 new patients, 66% were married and 18% experienced marital disruption. Presence of living children in the home and having attended any level of formal education were found to be protective of marriage (p values <0.0001 and 0.0045 respectively). Patients in the divorce group were more likely to have delivered a baby before the age of 18, be of Muslim background, and have a longer time since fistula formation (p values all <0.0001), as were those married younger than 18 and those whose fistula followed a vaginal delivery (p values 0.0015 and 0.0017 respectively).

Conclusion

Several factors correlate with disruption of the marriage relationship. Patients at highest risk for marital disruption should be identified early and provided with interventions aimed at protecting their marriage and social support system.

Keywords

Vesicovaginal Fistula Divorce Marriage Social consequences Genital fistula 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed S, Holtz SA. Social and economic consequences of obstetric fistula: life changed forever? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99:S10–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Young-Lin N, Namugunga EN, Lussy JP, Benfield N. Healthcare providers’ perspectives on the social reintegration of patients after surgical fistula repair in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130:161–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bangser M, Mehta M, Singer J, Daly C, Kamugumya C, Mwangomale A. Childbirth experiences of women with obstetric fistula in Tanzania and Uganda and their implications for fistula program development. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Velez A, Ramsey K, Tell K. The campaign to end fistula: what have we learned? Findings of facility and community needs assessments. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99:S143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy M. Social consequences of vesico-vaginal fistula in northern Nigeria. J Biosoc Sci. 1981;13:139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wall LL. Dead mothers and injured wives: the social context of maternal morbidity and mortality among the Hausa of northern Nigeria. Stud Fam Plan. 1998;29:341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis G, de Bernis L, editors. Obstetric fistulas: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet. 2006;368:1201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gharoro EP, Agholor KN. Aspects of psychosocial problems of patients with vesico-vaginal fistula. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:644–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilton P. Vesico-vaginal fistulas in developing countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82:285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arrowsmith S, Hamlin EC, Wall LL. Obstructed labor injury complex: obstetric fistula formation and the multifaceted morbidity of maternal birth trauma in the developing world. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51:568–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muleta M. Socio-demographic profile and obstetric experience of fistula patients managed at the Addis Ababa fistula hospital. Ethiop Med J. 2004;42:9–16.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirschner CV, Yost KJ, Du H, Karshima JA, Arrowsmith SD, Wall LL. Obstetric fistula: the ECWA evangel VVF center surgical experience from Jos, Nigeria. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1525–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wall LL, Karshima JA, Kirschner C, Arrowsmith SD. The obstetric vesicovaginal fistula: characteristics of 899 patients from Jos, Nigeria. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1011–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Imoto A, Matsuyama A, Ambauen-Berger B, Honda S. Health-related quality of life among women in rural Bangladesh after surgical repair of obstetric fistula. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evangel VVF CentreBingham University Teaching HospitalJosNigeria

Personalised recommendations