The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties within a Turkish population
Introduction and hypothesis
Women’s perceived satisfaction from their own genital appearance is linked to genital image and sexual esteem. A comprehensive and easy to use scale to measure self-image was scarce in the literature. It was aimed in the present study to complement cross-culturally adapted and validated into Turkish version of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS) and to assess its psychometric properties.
After cross-cultural adaptation, the Turkish version of the FGSI, Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were administered to 461 female participants. Content/face validity, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and reliability were appropriately assessed. Predefined and specific hypotheses were formulated for construct validity.
Our findings indicated excellent content/face validity, sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.818), and test–retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.951]. Construct validity was demonstrated by proving the hypothesis that participants who have performed at least one vaginal/clitoral masturbation for the last month reported significantly higher FGSIS scores compared with those who abstained (Z −6.37, p < 0.001). Factor analyses formed one factor structure. In the proposed two-factor construct, all seven items demonstrated good to high correlations with their subdomains and lower correlations with the other domain, indicating sufficient convergent validity.
The FGSIS was successfully validated for use in the Turkish population. The scale exhibited strong psychometric properties to assess perceived female genital image. It might be reliably used in genital cosmetic surgeries and in a variety of gynecologic conditions.
KeywordsGenital perception Female Genital Self-Image Scale Female sexual dysfunction Sexual well-being
Compliance with ethical standards
We have read and understood the journal’s policies on copyright, ethics, etc., and believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these.
Conflicts of interest
- 13.Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hummel SB, van Lankveld JJ, Oldenburg HS, Hahn DE, Kieffer JM, Gerritsma MA, Kuenen MA, Bijker N, Borgstein PJ, Heuff G. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy realizes long-term improvement in the sexual functioning and body image of breast Cancer survivors: internet-based CBT for sexual dysfunctions. J Sex Marit Ther. 2018;0(0):1–12.Google Scholar
- 26.Sargin MA, Yassa M, Taymur BD, Taymur B, Akca G, Tug N. Female sexual dysfunction in the late postpartum period among women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017;27(4):203–8.Google Scholar