Optimizing resident operative self-confidence through competency-based surgical education modules: are we there yet?

  • Roxana Geoffrion
  • Nicole A. Koenig
  • May S. Sanaee
  • Terry Lee
  • Nicole J. Todd
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Self-confidence is the belief in one’s ability to perform and can be enhanced by training. Surgical education should aim to optimize trainee confidence. We designed three procedure-specific competency-based modules to teach vaginal hysterectomy (VH), anterior (AR) and posterior repair (PR) to novice gynecology residents. We hypothesized each module would improve self-confidence and satisfaction during index procedure performance in the operating room.

Methods

This was an ancillary analysis of a larger randomized-controlled trial of gynecologic educational interventions. Residents at three Canadian universities were included if they had previously performed fewer than five index procedures independently. Intervention residents received educational modules; controls engaged in self-directed learning. All residents performed one or more of the three surgeries and filled out a validated Self-Confidence Scale and a Satisfaction Scale. Scores were compared between groups. Correlations were sought between self-confidence and various variables.

Results

Forty-six residents at three Canadian universities were randomized (21 intervention, 25 control). Most residents had never performed the index procedure. Overall, self-confidence was significantly higher (p = 0.021) in the intervention group for VH, but not for AR and PR (p = 0.94 and p = 0.12, respectively). Compared with controls, self-confidence was also significantly higher in intervention residents who had never performed VH (p = 0.026) or PR (p = 0.027) and in first and second year intervention residents. There was a positive correlation between self-confidence and satisfaction.

Conclusions

Surgical modules improved self-confidence preferentially in the most junior residents and for more complicated procedures. The wide self-confidence ranges observed suggest that optimization should be an important goal for surgical educators.

Keywords

Competency-based surgical education Gynecology Junior residents Self-confidence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

• R Geoffrion: Preceptor/proctor Boston Scientific Capio and Obtryx devices; Advisory Board Duchesnay.

• N Todd: Advisory board, Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

• Remaining authors claim no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, et al. Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surgery. 2009;197:537–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, et al. The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery. 2010;147(3):318–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R, et al. Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2588–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Driskell JE, Salas E. Stress and human performance. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geoffrion R. Standing on the shoulders of giants: contemplating a standard national curriculum for surgical training in gynecology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30(8):684–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denadai R, Saad-Hossne R, Raposo-Amaral CE. Simulation-based rhomboid flap skills training during medical education: comparing low- and high-fidelity bench models. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(6):2134–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skoy ET, Eukel HN, Frenzel JE. Comparison of low- and higher-fidelity simulation to train and assess pharmacy students’ injection technique. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(2):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bandura A. The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman & Co; 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feltz D, Short S, Sullivan P. Self efficacy in sport: research and strategies for working with athletes, teams and coaches. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2008;3:293–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geoffrion R, Suen MW, Koenig NA, et al. Teaching vaginal surgery to junior residents: initial validation of 3 novel procedure-specific low-fidelity models. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(1):157–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geoffrion R, Lee T, Singer J. Validating a self-confidence scale for surgical trainees. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(4):355–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hellier SD, Ramponi DR, Wrynn A, Garofalo S. An innovative approach: using simulation to teach primary care gynecologic procedures. Simul Healthcare. 2017;12(4):268–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farrar Highfield ME, Scharf-Swaller C, Chu L. Effect of nurse-led review plus simulation on obstetric/perinatal nurses’ self-assessed knowledge and confidence. Nurs Womens Health. 2017;20(6):568–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silva DR, Mazzo A, Jorge BM, Souza Júnior VD, Fumincelli L, Almeida RG. Intermittent urinary catheterization: the impact of training on a low-fidelity simulator on the selfi-confidence of patients and caregivers. Rehabil Nurs. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.226.
  15. 15.
    Naylor RA, Hollett LA, Castellvi A, et al. Preparing medical students to enter surgery residencies. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):105–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Healey A, Sherbino J, Fan J, et al. A low-fidelity simulation curriculum addresses needs identified by faculty and improves the comfort level of senior internal medicine resident physicians with inhospital resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(9):1899–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leopold SS, Morgan HD, Kadel NJ, et al. Impact of educational intervention on confidence and competence in the performance of a simple surgical task. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1031–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elfenbein DM. Confidence crisis among general surgery residents: a systematic review and qualitative discourse analysis. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1166–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Paul’s Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations