Outcome of rolled fortified vaginal flap operation on female patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: 2-year follow-up

  • Mohamed Shoukry
  • Mostafa Elmissiry
  • Mohamed Hassouna
  • Haitham Abdelmoteleb
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We evaluate the 2-year outcome of the rolled fortified vaginal flap (RFVF) operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD).

Methods

A prospective study of 20 women suffering from SUI due to ISD was conducted. All patients were subjected to history-taking, clinical examination, cough stress test, and urodynamics. Symptom severity and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using the Arabic version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). All studied women were followed up for 24 months to detect success rate, any postoperative complications, and reveal changes in the quality of life.

Results

Mean age was 53 ± 8 years. Preoperative Valsalva leak point pressure was 50.1 ± 11.3 cmH2O. After a follow-up period of 24 months, only 2 patients (10%) showed mild stress incontinence with mean VLPP 80± 3 cm H2O. Postoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q-max) and mean Pdet-Qmax showed no significant difference from the preoperative results (P = 0.115 and 0.187 respectively). The quality of life domain of the ICIQ-UI-SF decreased significantly from 73.5 ± 12.1% (preoperatively) to 2.6 ± 8.1% (after a 1-year follow-up), P < 0.001 and then showed a slight increase to 4.5 ± 10.6 at 24 months’ follow-up.

Conclusion

The RFVF operation has a success rate of 90% after a 24-month follow-up. It significantly improved the quality of life of women with SUI due to ISD.

Keywords

Stress urinary incontinence Rolled fortified vaginal flap Quality of life Urodynamics 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Thom D. Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(4):473–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward KL, Hilton P. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):324–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallner LP, Porten S, Meenan RT, O’Keefe Rosetti MC, Calhoun EA, Sarma AV, et al. Prevalence and severity of undiagnosed urinary incontinence in women. Am J Med. 2009;122(11):1037–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rawlings T, Zimmern PE. Economic analyses of stress urinary incontinence surgical procedures in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(8):1040–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI, Pepe V. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1980;124(2):256–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang W, Zhu L, Lang J. Transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104(2):113–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson TS, Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Management of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in women. J Urol. 2003;169(5):1662–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vayleux B, Rigaud J, Luyckx F, Karam G, Le Normand L. Female urinary incontinence and artificial urinary sphincter: study of efficacy and risk factors for failure and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;59(6):1048–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hashim H, Avery K, Mourad MS, Chamssuddin A, Ghoniem G, Abrams P. The Arabic ICIQ-UI SF: an alternative language version of the English ICIQ-UI SF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J. The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):1063–6. discussion 1066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(5):553–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shoukry M, Hassouna M, AbdEl-Kerim A, et al. Rolled vaginal wall flap for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. African J Urol. 2011;17:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape operation in an unselected group of 129 stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):482–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doo CK, Hong B, Chung BJ, Kim JY, Jung HC, Lee K-SS, et al. Five-year outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2006;50(2):333–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paick JS, Ku JH, Shin JW, Son H, Oh SJ, Kim SW. Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence with low Valsalva leak point pressure. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1370–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bullock T, Ghoniem G, Klutke C, Staskin D. Advances in female stress urinary incontinence: mid-urethral slings. BJU Int. 2006;98(S1):32–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phé V, Benadiba S, Rouprêt M, Granger B, Richard F, Chartier-Kastler E. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014;113(6):961–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan TO, Westney OL, McGuire EJ. Pubovaginal sling: 4-year outcome analysis and quality of life assessment. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1845–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holmgren C, Hellberg D, Lanner L, Nilsson S. Quality of life after tension-free vaginal tape surgery for female stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):131–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, Urology DepartmentAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations