Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 1433–1458 | Cite as

The effects of public research and subsidies on regional structural strength

  • Thomas BrennerEmail author
  • Franziska Pudelko
Regular Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

The paper analyzes the effects of public research (publications) and research and education subsidies on regional structural strength. To this end it takes new approaches in two respects: First, we use a vector auto-regressive (VAR) model to detect reciprocal effects. Second, we introduce a new measure for structural strength based on the regions’ industrial composition. We find that the effects of public research and public subsidies differ depending on the location’s innovativeness. Both scientific activity and public subsidies are found to have positive effects on regional structural strength in less innovative and economically weak regions, but low or even negative effects in economically strong regions.

Keywords

Structural strength Structural change Public research VAR model Spatial effects 

JEL Classification

C33 R11 R50 

Notes

Acknoledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number: 01HI16004P).

Supplementary material

191_2019_626_MOESM1_ESM.csv (784 kb)
ESM 1 (CSV 784 kb)

References

  1. Alecke B, Mitze T, Untiedt G (2013) Growth effects of regional policy in Germany: results from a spatially augmented multiplicative interaction model. Ann Reg Sci 50:535–554Google Scholar
  2. Almeida A, Figueiredo A, Rui Silva M (2011) From concept to policy: building regional innovation systems in follower regions. Eur Plan Stud 19(7):1331–1356Google Scholar
  3. Almus M, Czarnitzki D (2003) The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: the case of eastern Germany. J Bus Econ Stat 21(2):226–236Google Scholar
  4. Antrikopoulos A, Brox J, Carvalho E (1990) Shift-share analysis and the potential for predicting regional growth patterns: some evidence for the region of Quebec, Canada. Growth Chang 21:1–10Google Scholar
  5. Brenner T, Dorner M, (2017) Is there a life cycle in all industries? First evidence from industry size dynamics in West Germany. Appl Econ Lett 24:289–297Google Scholar
  6. Beise M, Stahl H (1999) Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Res Policy 28(4):397–422Google Scholar
  7. Beyer H-G (1998) The theory of evolution strategies. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research) (2017) WIR! – Wandel durch Innovation in der Region: Ein Programm für Innovation und Strukturwandel. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie/Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy) (2016) Koordinierungsrahmen der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur“ ab 4. August 2016Google Scholar
  10. Boschma R (2014) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Reg Stud 49(5):733–751Google Scholar
  11. Boschma R (2017) Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda. Reg Stud 51(3):351–364Google Scholar
  12. Boschma R, Frenken K (2011) Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In: Cooke P, Asheim B, Boschma R, Martin R, Schwartz D, Tödtling F (eds) Chapter 14, the handbook on regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 187–197Google Scholar
  13. Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M (2013) The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: a proximity approach based on product relatedness. Econ Geogr 89(1):29–51Google Scholar
  14. Boschma R, Heimeriks G, Balland P-A (2014) Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Res Policy 43:107–114Google Scholar
  15. Brenner T, Duschl M (2015) Causal dynamic effects in regional systems of technological activities: a SVAR approach. Ann Reg Sci 55(1):103–130Google Scholar
  16. Brenner T, Capasso M, Duschl M, Frenken K, Treibich T (2018) Causal relations between knowledge-intensive business services and regional employment growth. Reg Stud 52(2):172–183Google Scholar
  17. Brown A, Fornoni R, Gardiner B, Greunz L, Jestl S, Rabemiafara N, Römisch R, Stenning J, Ward T (2017) Final report - economic challenges of lagging regions. European Commission BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. Castaldi C, Frenken K, Los B (2015) Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs. An analysis of US state-level patenting. Reg Stud 49:767–781Google Scholar
  19. Coad A, Cowling M, Siepel J (2012) Growth processes of high-growth firms in the UK. Nesta Working Paper 12/10Google Scholar
  20. Cooke P, Memedovic O (2006) Regional innovation systems as public goods. United Nations industrial development organisation. Working papers, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  21. Dachs B, Peters B (2014) Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms. A European perspective. In: Research Policy 43:214–232Google Scholar
  22. De Rassenfosse G, Williams R (2015) Rules of engagement: measuring connectivity in national systems of higher education. High Educ 70:941–956Google Scholar
  23. Dettmann E, Brachert M, Titze M (2016) Identifying the effects of placed-based policies – causal evidence from Germany. Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) Discussion Papers 18/2016Google Scholar
  24. Di Berardino C, Mauro G, Quaglione D, Sarraet A (2017) Structural change and the sustainability of regional convergence: evidence from the Italian regions. Environ Plann C 35(2):289–311Google Scholar
  25. Drucker J, Goldstein H (2007) Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: a review of current approaches. Int Reg Sci Rev 30(1):20–46Google Scholar
  26. Dunn ES (1960) A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Pap Reg Sci 6:97–112Google Scholar
  27. Duschl M, Schimke A, Brenner T, Luxen D (2014) Firm growth and the spatial impact of geolocated external factors. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 234(2–3):234–256Google Scholar
  28. Duschl M, Scholl T, Brenner T, Luxen D, Raschke F (2015) Industry-specific firm growth and agglomeration. Reg Stud 49(11):1822–1839Google Scholar
  29. Eberle J, Brenner T, Mitze T (2017) A look behind the curtain – Measuring the complex economic effects of regional structural funds in Germany. Working Papers on Innovation and Space Vol. 03.17Google Scholar
  30. European Commission (2017) Competitiveness in low-income and low-growth regions. The lagging regions report. Commission Staff Working Document. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  31. Ezcurra R, Gil G, Pascual P, Rapún M (2005) Regional inequality in the European Union: does industry mix matter? Reg Stud 39(6):679–697Google Scholar
  32. Fagerberg J (2000) Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comparative study. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 11(4):393–411Google Scholar
  33. Farhauer O, Kröll A (2012) Diversified specialization - going one step beyond regional economics’ specialization-diversification concept. Review of Regional Research 32:63–84Google Scholar
  34. Foray D (2014) From smart specialization to smart specialization policy. Eur J Innov Manag 17(4):492–507Google Scholar
  35. Frenken K, Boschma R (2007) A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. J Econ Geogr 7:635–649Google Scholar
  36. Frenken K, van Oort F, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg Stud 41(5):685–697Google Scholar
  37. Frenken K, Izquierdo LR, Zeppini P (2012) Branching innovation, recombinant innovation, and endogenous technological transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 4:25–35Google Scholar
  38. Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2007) Universities and innovation in space. Ind Innov 14:201–218Google Scholar
  39. Gehrke B, Legler H, Leidmann M, Hippe K (2009) Forschungs- und wissensintensive Wirtschaftszweige. Produktion, Wertschöpfung und Beschäftigung in Deutschland sowie Qualifikationserfordernisse im europäischen Vergleich. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 3–2009. HannoverGoogle Scholar
  40. Grabher G (1993) The weakness of strong ties. The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher G (ed) The embedded firm - on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. Routledge, London, pp 255–277Google Scholar
  41. Graf H (2011) Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Camb J Econ 35:173–198Google Scholar
  42. Jackson M, Petrakos G (2001) Industrial performance under transition: the impact of structure and geography. In: Petrakos G, Totev S (eds) The development of the Balkan region. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 141–174Google Scholar
  43. Jackson RW, Hewings GJD, Sonis M (1989) Decomposition approaches to the identification of change in regional economies. Econ Geogr 65(3):216–231Google Scholar
  44. Jones PS (2012) Job creation and regional change under new labor: a shift-share analysis. Environ Plan A 44:1348–1362Google Scholar
  45. Kallioras D, Petrakos G (2010) Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: evidence from the EU new member-states regions. Ann Reg Sci 45:667–680Google Scholar
  46. Kaufmann A, Wagner P (2005) EU regional policy and the stimulation of innovation: the role of the European regional development fund in the objective 1 region Burgenland. Eur Plan Stud 13(4):581–599Google Scholar
  47. Koschatzky K, Stahlecker T (2018) Innovationsbasierter regionaler Strukturwandel in Deutschland – Chancen, Risiken und politische Perspektiven. ISI-Schriftenreihe “Innovationspotenziale”. Fraunhofer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  48. Lechevalier S, Nishimura J, Storz C (2014) Diversity in patterns of industry evolution: how an intrapreneurial regime contributed to the emergence of the service robot industry. Res Policy 43:1716–1729Google Scholar
  49. Marelli E (2004) Evolution of employment structures and regional specialisation in the EU. Econ Syst 28:35–59Google Scholar
  50. Martin R, Simmie J (2008) Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innov Manag Policy Pract 10(2–3):183–196Google Scholar
  51. Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6:395–437Google Scholar
  52. Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15(1):1–42Google Scholar
  53. Martin R, Pike A, Tyler P, Gardiner B (2016) Spatially rebalancing the UK economy: towards a new policy model? Reg Stud 50(2):342–357Google Scholar
  54. McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2015) Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Reg Stud 49(8):1291–1302Google Scholar
  55. Mitze T (2012) Speed up or slow down? The effects of capital investment grants on German regional growth. In: Mitze T (ed): Empirical modelling in regional science: towards a global time-space-structural analysis. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 657. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 273–302Google Scholar
  56. Mitze T, Paloyo AR, Alecke B (2015) Is there a purchase limit on regional growth? A quasi-experimental evaluation of investment grants using matching techniques. Int Reg Sci Rev 38:388–412Google Scholar
  57. Mohl P, Hagen T (2010) Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(5):353–365Google Scholar
  58. Moneta A, Entner D, Hoyer PO, Coad A (2013) Causal inference by independent component analysis: theory and application. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 75:705–730Google Scholar
  59. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Econ Geogr 87:237–265Google Scholar
  60. O’Leary E (2003) Aggregate and sectoral convergence among Irish regions: the role of structural change, 1960-96. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(4):483–501Google Scholar
  61. O’Leary E, Webber DJ (2015) The role of structural change in European regional productivity growth. Reg Stud 49(9):1548–1560Google Scholar
  62. Paci R, Pigliaru F (1997) European regional growth: do sectors matter? Working paper CRENoS 199703. Centre for north south economic research. University of Cagliari and Sassari, SardiniaGoogle Scholar
  63. Pellegrini G, Terribile F, Tarola O, Muccigrosso T, Busillo F (2012) Measuring the effects of European regional policy on economic growth: a regression discontinuity approach. Pap Reg Sci 92(1):217–233Google Scholar
  64. Peneder M (2003) Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 14:427–448Google Scholar
  65. Petrakos G (2001) Patterns of regional inequality in transition economies. Eur Plan Stud 9(3):359–383Google Scholar
  66. Puigcerver-Peñalver M-C (2007) The impact of structural funds policy on European regions ́ growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. Eur J Comp Econ 4(2):179–208Google Scholar
  67. Quatraro F (2009) Innovation, structural change and productivity growth: evidence from Italian regions, 1980-2003. Camb J Econ 33:1001–1022Google Scholar
  68. Rhoden I (2016) Econometric analysis of regional productivity convergence in Germany from 2000 to 2012. Ruhr-Forschungsinstitut für Innovations- und Strukturpolitik e.V. (RUFIS) Nr. 2/2016. Bochum: Universitätsverlag BrockmeyerGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodríguez-Pose A (2018) The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Camb J Reg Econ Soc 11:189–209Google Scholar
  70. Rodríguez-Pose A, Fratesi U (2004) Between development and social policies: the impact of European structural funds in objective 1 regions. Reg Stud 38(1):97–113Google Scholar
  71. Schiersch A, Gehrke B (2014) Die Wissenswirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich: Strukturen, Produktivität, Außenhandel. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 6–2014. Berlin, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  72. Schubert T, Kroll H (2013) Endbericht zum Projekt "Hochschulen als regionaler Wirtschaftsfaktor". Studie im Auftrag von Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft. Fraunhofer ISI, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  73. Schwanen T, Dijst M (2002) Travel-time ratios for visits to the workplace: the relationship between commuting time and work duration. Transp Res A Policy Pract 36(7):573–592Google Scholar
  74. Silva EG, Teixeira AAC (2008) Surveying structural change: seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19:273–300Google Scholar
  75. Smith K (2005) Measuring innovation. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 148–179Google Scholar
  76. Tanner AN (2015) The emergence of new technology-based industries: the case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. J Econ Geogr 16(3):611–635Google Scholar
  77. Thakur SK (2011) Fundamental economic structure and structural change in regional economies: a methodological approach. Région et Développement 33:9–38Google Scholar
  78. Trippl M, Frangenheim A (2018) Regionaler Strukturwandel und neue Pfadentwicklung durch Innovation: Herausforderungen für die Politik. In: Koschatzky K, Stahlecker T (eds): Innovationsbasierter regionaler Strukturwandel in Deutschland – Chancen, Risiken und politische Perspektiven. ISI-Schriftenreihe „Innovationspotenziale“. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag, 51–71Google Scholar
  79. Vale DS (2013) Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analyzing the impacts of commuting behavior as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use Centre in Lisbon. J Transp Geogr 32:38–48Google Scholar
  80. Vertesy D, Van Roy V (2013) Update on the composite indicators of structural change towards a more knowledge-intensive economy. Deliverable for WP3 of the research project “COMPOSITES_4_IU”. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
  81. Von Ehrlich M, Seidel T (2015) The persistent effects of place-based policy: evidence from the West-German Zonenrandgebiet. CESifo Working Paper No. 5373Google Scholar
  82. Vu KM (2017) Structural change and economic growth: empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 41:64–77Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philipps-Universität MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations