Advertisement

Between-satellite single-difference integer ambiguity resolution in GPS/GNSS network solutions

  • Rengui RuanEmail author
  • Ziqing Wei
Original Article
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

In various GNSS applications with high requirements for precision, integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) is of great significance for taking full advantage of precise carrier-phase observations. Until now, there are two approaches to achieving IAR in network solutions, i.e., to resolve double-difference (DD) integer ambiguities or to resolve zero-difference (ZD) integer ambiguities. In this paper, we will present an approach to resolving between-satellite single-difference (BSSD) integer ambiguities in network solutions. BSSD ambiguity fixing can be divided into two main steps: Firstly, WL satellite FCBs are estimated to help to fix WL BSSD ambiguities and then narrow-lane (NL) BSSD ambiguity resolution is performed in a bootstrapping mode: datum BSSD ambiguities are selected and compulsorily fixed to the nearest integers and then a standard sequential fixing procedure is employed for the remaining independent BSSD ambiguities. Network solutions with GPS data from about 130 stations were conducted to validate the proposed approach. Experimental results show that the quality of satellite orbits, station coordinates and satellite clocks obtained with the new approach was almost the same as that with the DD approach. It is also shown that the new approach enjoyed slightly higher fixing ratio for both WL and NL ambiguities and was superior in computation efficiency, e.g., an improvement of 60% on average was achieved in this study. As demonstrated by experiments of precise point positioning (PPP) with 30-min data, satellite clocks achieved with the new approach have the ability to support IAR in PPP, just like those achieved with ZD IAR approach.

Keywords

GNSS Network solution Integer ambiguity resolution Between-satellite single-difference Integer-recovery clock Precise point positioning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41704035) and the Office of China Navigation Satellite System (Project No. GFZX03010403). The authors are grateful to the International GNSS Service for providing data and products for experiments. The authors are also grateful to the LAMBDA Team for providing the LAMBDA software for reference.

References

  1. Beohm J, Neill A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304Google Scholar
  2. Bierman GJ (1977) Factorization methods for discrete sequential estimation. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 94:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondy JA, Murty USR (1976) Graph theory with applications. Elsevier, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins P, Lahaye F, Heroux P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model. In: ION GNSS 2008, Savannah, GA, 16–18, Sept. 2008. pp 1315–1322Google Scholar
  6. Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Heroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. Navigation 57:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Jonge PJ (1998) A processing strategy for the application of the GPS in networks. Dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  8. De Jonge PJ, Tiberius C (1996) The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects. LGR-Series, vol 12. Publications of the Delft Computing Centre, LGR-Series, pp 1–47Google Scholar
  9. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94:3949–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. J Geodesy 83:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabor MJ, Nerem RS (1999) GPS carrier phase ambiguity resolution using satellite-satellite single differences. In: ION GPS 99, Nashville, TN, 14–17 Sept. 1999. pp 1569–1578Google Scholar
  12. Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP (2005) Improving carrier-phase ambiguity resolution in global GPS network solutions. J Geodesy 79:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geodesy 84:569–581Google Scholar
  14. Ge M, Chen J, Dousa J, Gendt G, Wickert J (2012) A computationally efficient approach for estimating high-rate satellite clock corrections in realtime. GPS Solut 16:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geng J, Meng X, Dodson AH, Teferle FN (2010) Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison. J Geodesy 84:569–581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0399-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geng J, Shi C, Ge M, Dodson AH, Lou Y, Zhao Q, Liu J (2012) Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning. J Geodesy 86:579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleusberg A, Teunissen PJG (eds) (1996) GPS for geodesy, vol 60. Lecture Notes in Earth Siences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Kouba J (2009) A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites. GPS Solut 13:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lannes A, Priur JL (2013) Calibration of the clock-phase biases of GNSS networks: the closure-ambiguity approach. J Geodesy 87:709–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laurichesse D, Mercier F (2007) Interger ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP. In: ION GNSS 2007, Fort Worth, TX, 25–28 Sept. 2007, pp 839–848Google Scholar
  21. Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undiffereced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Zhang X (2012) Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Navig 65:513–529.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li P, Zhang X, Ren X, Zuo X, Pan Y (2016) Generating GPS satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning. GPS Solutions 20:771–782.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0483-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Capdeville H, Marty J-C (2012) Zero-difference GPS ambiguity resolution at CNES-CLS IGS analysis center. J Geodesy 86:991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mervart L (1995) Ambiguity resolution techniques in geodetic and geodynamic applications of the global positioning system. Dissertation, University of BerneGoogle Scholar
  27. Petit Ge, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions (2010). IERS Technical Note, vol 36. International earth rotation and reference systems serviceGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruan R (2015) Ambiguity Resolution for GPS/GNSS Network Solution with SPODS. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 44:128–134 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  29. Ruan R, Jia X, Wu X, Feng L, Zhu Y (2014) SPODS software and its result of precise orbit determination for GNSS satellites. In: Sun J, Jiao W, Wu H, Lu M (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2014 Nanjing, 21–23 May 2014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 301–312Google Scholar
  30. Ruan R, Wei Z, Feng L (2018) Satellite clock estimation with between-satellite single difference phase ambiguity fixing. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 47:916–923 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  31. Schmid R, Dach R, Collilieux X, Jäggi A, Schmitz M, Dilssner F (2016) Absolute IGS antenna phase center model igs08.atx: status and potential improvements. J Geodesy 90:343–364.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0876-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Springer TA (1999) Modeling and validating orbits and clocks using the global positioning system. Dissertation, Astronomical Institute, University of BerneGoogle Scholar
  33. Teunissen PJG, Joosten P, Tiberius CCJM (1999) Geometry-free ambiguity success rates in case of partial fixing. Paper presented at the ION-NTM 1999Google Scholar
  34. Wei Z, Ruan R, Jia X, Wu X, Song X, Mao Y, et al (2014) Satellite positioning and orbit determination system SPODS: theory and test. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 43:1–4 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  35. Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscripta Geodaetic 18:91–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xi’an Research Institute of Surveying and MappingXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geo-information EngineeringXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations