The realization and evaluation of mixed GPS/BDS PPP ambiguity resolution
- 87 Downloads
Aiming at shortening convergence time and improving positioning accuracy, multi-GNSS precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) has been an important issue in the past decade. In this paper, a mixed (or inter-system) GPS and BDS PPP-AR model with inter-system biases considered is proposed. Datasets from the IGS MGEX network are utilized in the study to evaluate the proposed model. As a critical correction in multi-GNSS PPP-AR, the inter-system bias (ISB) can be treated as a fixed constant or unknown estimate. The effects of various ISB processing methods on other key corrections for PPP-AR, such as fractional cycle bias (FCB) and inter-system phase bias (ISPB), are analyzed. Experimental results indicate that fixing or estimating ISB approaches will not affect GPS FCB estimations. However, various ISB dealing methods will have a significant influence on some BDS FCB and ISPB estimations at some stations because of the limited BDS tracking satellites over long periods of observation. Regardless of the presence of unstable FCB products on some BDS satellites, narrow-lane FCBs on other satellites are time-continuous, and their daily changes are within the range of 0.3 cycle. And in aspect of the time to first fix (TTFF), fixing ISB is superior to estimating it. The performance of the mixed GPS and BDS PPP-AR is evaluated. Experimental results indicate that compared with the intra-system PPP-AR, the mixed method has no superiority when ISB is estimated. While it has a slight improvement in TTFF, i.e., from 969.64 to 897.96 s, however, the total fixed rate decreases from 86.5 to 85.56% when ISB is fixed as a constant. In addition, the mixed PPP-AR shows significant improvement over the intra-system PPP-AR under circumstances with limited satellite visibility.
KeywordsGPS BDS PPP-AR ISB Intra-system Inter-system Mixed
This work has been supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41504027).
- Cai C, Gao Y (2007) Performance analysis of precise point positioning based on combined GPS and GLONASS. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, pp 858–865Google Scholar
- Collins P, Lahaye F, He´rous P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008. Institute of Navigation, Savannah, GA, 16–19 Sept, pp 1315–1322Google Scholar
- Dilssner F, Springer T, Schönemann E, Enderle W (2014) Estimation of satellite antenna phase center corrections for BeiDou. IGS Workshop 2014, Pasadena, California, USA, June 23–27Google Scholar
- Frei E, Beutler G (1990) Rapid static positioning based on the fast ambiguity resolution approach FARA: theory and first results. Manuscripta Geodaetica 15:325–356Google Scholar
- Landau H, Brandl M, Chen X, Drescher R, Glocker M, Nardo A, Nitschke M, Salazar D, Weinbach U, Zhang F (2013) Towards the inclusion of Galileo and BeiDou/compass satellites in trimble centerpoint RTX. In: Proceedings of the 26th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS + 2013), Nashville, pp 1215–1223Google Scholar
- Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Odijk D, Zhang B, Teunissen PJG (2015) Multi-GNSS PPP and PPP-RTK: some GPS + BDS results in Australia. In: Proceedings of the China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2015, Vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 613–623Google Scholar
- Takasu T, Yasuda A (2010) Kalman-filter-based integer ambiguity resolution strategy for long-baseline RTK with ionosphere and troposphere estimation. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS, Portland, OR, USA, 21–24 Sept 2010, pp 161–171Google Scholar
- Teunissen PJG, Verhagen S (2009) GNSS carrier phase ambiguity resolution: challenges and open problems. In: Sideris MG (ed) Observing our changing Earth. Springer, Berlin, pp 785–792Google Scholar
- Teunissen PJG, Joosten P, Tiberius C (1999) Geometry-free ambiguity success rates in case of partial fixing. In: Proceedings of the 1999 national technical meeting of The Institute of Navigation. SanDiego, CA, pp 201–207Google Scholar