Advertisement

Journal of Management Control

, Volume 29, Issue 3–4, pp 361–397 | Cite as

An empirical analysis of the curvilinear relationship between slack and firm performance

  • Josep M. Argilés-BoschEmail author
  • Josep Garcia-Blandón
  • Diego Ravenda
  • Mónica Martínez-Blasco
Original Paper
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

This study performs an in-depth analysis of the curvilinear relationship between slack and future firm performance. Using a sample of US firms, we analyze the influence of three indicators of absorbed and unabsorbed slack on the two commonest dimensions of firm performance: profitability and sales growth. Although the relationship between most slack variables and firm performance is curvilinear, the inflection points (for both maximums and minimums) lie mainly outside the distribution range of the slack variables and, consequently, the curvilinear relationships between slack and performance are, in fact, neither U-shaped nor inverted U-shaped. Therefore, the influence of slack on performance can be positive or negative: linear for certain variables, but concave/convex for most variables analyzed in our study. An additional important finding is that the influence of slack on future profitability is usually the opposite of its influence on future sales growth: negative and positive, respectively, for absorbed slack; positive and negative, respectively, for financial slack. Results are robust to different lagged periods of the independent variables. The effects of equity and cash slacks on future performance are mainly negative, especially for longer time periods.

Keywords

Profitability Sales growth Slack Non-linear relationship Absorbed slack Unabsorbed slack 

References

  1. Alvarez, R., & Crespi, G. (2003). Determinants of technical efficiency in small firms. Small Business Economics, 20, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. (2003). Are selling, general and administrative costs sticky? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argilés, J. M., Martí, J., Monllau, T., Garcia, J., & Urgell, T. (2014). Empirical analysis of the incidence of accidents in the workplace on firms’ financial performance. Safety Science, 70, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2007). Competitor-oriented objectives: The myth of market share. International Journal of Business, 12, 117–136.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 2931–2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bercovitz, J., & Mitchell, W. (2007). When is more better? The impact of business scale and scope on long-term business survivial, while controlling for profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourgeois, L. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011a). The importance of slack for new organizations facing “tough” environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1071–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley, S. W., Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011b). Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning-performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 37–59.Google Scholar
  13. Caves, R. E., & Barton, D. (1990). Efficiency in US manufacturing industries. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chiu, Y., & Liaw, Y. (2009). Organisational slack: Is more or less better? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(3), 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, A. C., Dunkelberg, W. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived changes for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1956). Organizational factors in the theory of oligopoly. Quarterly Journals of Economics, 70, 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1165–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1249–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elbanna, S. (2012). Slack, planning and organizational performance: Evidence from the Arab Middle East. European Management Review, 9, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hendricks, K. B., Singha, V. R., & Zhang, R. (2009). The effects of operational slack, diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hope, O. K., & Thomas, W. B. (2008). Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 591–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2012). Slack resources in team learning and project performance. Journal of Business Research, 65, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hvide, H. K., & Møen, J. (2010). Lean and hungry or fat and content? Entrepreneurs’ wealth and start-up performance. Management Science, 56, 1242–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, H., & Sung-Choon, K. (2013). Strategic HR functions and firm performance: The moderating effects of high-involvement work practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8, 11–26.Google Scholar
  30. Lecuona, J. C., & Reitzig, M. (2014). Knowledge worth having in excess: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 954–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lind, J. T., & Mehlun, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Love, E. G., & Nohria, N. (2005). Reducing slack: The performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1997-93. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1087–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Markman, G. D., & Gartner, W. B. (2002). Is extraordinary growth profitable? A study of Inc. 500 high-growth companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martinelli, C. (1997). Small firms, borrowing constraints, and reputation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mellahi, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). A study of the association between level of slack reduction following downsizing and innovation output. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1179–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Modi, S. B., & Mishra, S. (2011). What drives financial performance-resource efficiency or resource slack? Evidence from U.S. based manufacturing firms from 1991 to 2006. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noci, G. (1994). Accounting and non-accounting measures of quality-based performances in small firms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15, 78–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peng, M. W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. (2010). CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27, 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unravelling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salge, T., & Vera, A. (2013). Small steps that matter: Incremental learning, slack resources and organizational performance. British Journal of Management, 24, 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steffens, P., Davidsson, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Performance configurations over time: Implications for growth- and profit-oriented strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Su, Z., Xie, E., Wang, D., & Li, Y. (2011). Entrepreneurial strategy making, resources, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Small Business Economics, 36, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Syzmanski, D. M., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1993). An analysis of the market share-profitability relationship. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tan, J. (2003). Curvilinear relationship between organizational slack and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese state enterprises. European Management Journal, 21(6), 740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2010). Flexibility-efficiency tradeoff and performance implications among Chinese SOEs. Journal of Business Research, 63, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Paeleman, I. (2013). The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1070–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Voss, G. B., Sidershmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang, C., & Liu, H. M. (2012). Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure. Management Decision, 50, 1022–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. You, J. (1995). Small firms in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zona, F. (2012). Corporate investing as a response to economic downturn: Prospect theory, the behavioural agency model and the role of financial slack. British Journal of Management, 23, S42–S57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josep M. Argilés-Bosch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josep Garcia-Blandón
    • 2
  • Diego Ravenda
    • 3
  • Mónica Martínez-Blasco
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business, Facultat d’Econòmiques i EmpresarialsUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departament of Economics and FinanceIQS School of Management, Universitat Ramón LlullBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Management Control, Accounting and AuditingToulouse Business School, University of Toulouse, Campus BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations