Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 1997–2012 | Cite as

Relative efficiency of oil price versus oil output in promoting economic growth: Is OPEC’s strategy right?

  • Olesia Kozlova
  • Jose Noguera-SantaellaEmail author
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

A dilemma faced by oil exporting countries is the relative efficiency of the traditional OPEC cartel policy of setting quotas to target a certain crude oil price level versus the policy usually followed by non-OPEC countries of choosing the crude oil output level that maximizes profits, taking the oil price level as given. This paper contributes to the oil and macroeconomics literature by using panel cointegration techniques that consider cross-sectional dependence and structural breaks to study the relative efficiency of these policies to promote economic growth in oil exporting countries.

Keywords

Oil price Oil production Oil exporters OPEC Economic growth Panel cointegration 

JEL Classification

O40 Q43 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aguiar-Conraria L, Wen Y (2012) OPEC’s oil exporting strategy and macroeconomic (in) stability. Energy Econ 34:132–136Google Scholar
  2. Alekperov V (2011) Oil of Russia: past, present & future. East View Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Iriani M (2006) Energy-GDP relationship revisited: an example from GCC countries using panel causality. Energy Policy 34:3342–3350Google Scholar
  4. Asafu-Adjaye J (2000) The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Econ 22(6):615–625Google Scholar
  5. Beckmann J, Czudaj R (2013) Oil prices and effective dollar exchange rates. Int Rev Econ Finance 27:621–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belke A, Dreger C (2015) The transmission of oil and food prices to consumer prices—evidence for the MENA countries. IEEP 12(1):143–161Google Scholar
  7. Belke A, Gros D (2014) A simple model of an oil based global savings glut—the “China factor” and the OPEC cartel. IEEP 11(3):413–430Google Scholar
  8. Belke A, Dobnik F, Dreger C (2011) Energy consumption and economic growth: new insights into the cointegration relationship. Energy Econ 33:782–789Google Scholar
  9. Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Advances in econometrics, vol 15. Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp 161–178Google Scholar
  10. Damette O, Seghir M (2013) Energy as a driver of growth in oil exporting countries? Energy Econ 37:193–199Google Scholar
  11. Ftiti Z, Guesmi K, Teulon F, Chouachi S (2014) Evolution of crude oil prices and economic growth: the case of OPEC countries. IPAG business school working paper series WP 2014-421Google Scholar
  12. Güntner J (2014) How do oil producers respond to oil demand shocks? Energy Econ 44:1–13Google Scholar
  13. Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econom J 3:148–161Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton J (1983) Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. J Polit Econ 91:228–248Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton J (2009) Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. Brooking papers on economic activity, Spring, pp 215–261Google Scholar
  16. Herrera A, Lagalo L, Wadaa T (2011) Oil price shocks and industrial production: is the relationship linear? Macroecon Dyn 15(S3):472–497Google Scholar
  17. Im K, Pesaran M, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:53–74Google Scholar
  18. Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom 90:1–44Google Scholar
  19. Kilian L (2008) The economic effects of energy price shocks. J Econ Lit 46(4):871–909Google Scholar
  20. Kilian L, Vigfusson L (2011) Nonlinearities in the oil price-output relationship. Macroecon Dyn 15(3):337–363Google Scholar
  21. Levin A, Lin C (1992) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. UC San Diego working paper 92-23Google Scholar
  22. Levin A, Lin C, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24Google Scholar
  23. Lin S, Tamvakis M (2010) OPEC announcements and their effects on crude oil prices. Energy Policy 38:1010–1016Google Scholar
  24. Maddala G, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652Google Scholar
  25. Masih A, Masih R (1996) Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error correction modeling techniques. Energy Econ 18(3):165–183Google Scholar
  26. Mehrara M (2007) Energy consumption and economic growth: the case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy 35(5):2939–2945Google Scholar
  27. Mensi W, Hammoudeh S, Yoon S-M (2014) How do OPEC news and structural breaks impact returns and volatility in crude oil markets? Further evidence from a long memory process. Energy Econ 42:343–354Google Scholar
  28. Narayan P, Liu R (2015) A unit root model for trending time-series energy variables. Energy Econ 50:391–402Google Scholar
  29. Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554Google Scholar
  30. Noguera J (2013) Oil prices: breaks and trends. Energy Econ 37:60–67Google Scholar
  31. Noguera J, Pecchenino R (2007) OPEC and the international oil market: can a cartel fuel the engine of economic development? Int J Ind Organ 25(1):187–199Google Scholar
  32. O’Connell P (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. J Int Econ 44:1–19Google Scholar
  33. Oh W, Lee K (2004) Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970–1999. Energy Econ 26(1):51–59Google Scholar
  34. Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670Google Scholar
  35. Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20:597–625Google Scholar
  36. Pesaran M (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. The Economic and Social Research Council, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pesaran M (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22(2):265–312Google Scholar
  38. Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (1997) Estimating long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels. DAE working papers amalgamated series 9721Google Scholar
  39. Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94:621–634Google Scholar
  40. Reboredo J (2012) Modelling oil price and exchange rate co-movements. J Policy Model 34(3):419–440Google Scholar
  41. Schmidbauer H, Rösch A (2012) OPEC news announcements: effects on oil price expectation and volatility. Energy Econ 34:1656–1663Google Scholar
  42. Skeet I (1991) OPEC: twenty-five years of prices and politics. Cambridge energy and environment series. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Stern D (2000) A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Econ 22(2):267–283Google Scholar
  44. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748Google Scholar
  45. Westerlund J, Edgerton D (2008) A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70(5):665–690Google Scholar
  46. Yergin D (2008) The prize: the epic quest for oil, money & power. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Yousefi A, Wirjanto T (2004) The empirical role of the exchange rate on the crude-oil price formation. Energy Econ 26(5):783–799Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWhittier CollegeWhittierUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad de Santiago de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations