Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 901–921 | Cite as

Which leading journal leads? Idea diffusion in economics research journals

  • Allen BellasEmail author
  • Lea-Rachel Kosnik
Article

Abstract

Do general interest journals set the trends in research attention to particular topics, or is it field journals that have greater initial influence? In this paper, we focus on the subfield of environmental economics and attempt to empirically identify whether it has been the leading general interest journals or the top environmental economics field journal that has set the research trends on climate change, air pollution, water pollution, and other topics. We use textual analysis and Granger causality tests to investigate the question of which journals lead in publication of papers related to these topics in environmental economics. Our results indicate that leadership depends on the topic; however, there is some evidence that the top field journal in environmental economics generally took the lead in more controversial topics.

Keywords

Environmental economics Textual analysis Granger causality Research diffusion 

JEL Classification

A10 Q50 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the help and assistance of Julia Paljor, Melissa Maxwell, Ruth Zietlow, Minh Vo, and Barrett Kirwan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability

The datasets of this paper (1. code and programs, 2. data, 3. detailed readme files) are collected in the electronic supplementary material of this article.

Supplementary material

181_2018_1466_MOESM1_ESM.txt (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TXT 60 kb)
181_2018_1466_MOESM2_ESM.txt (22 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (TXT 22 kb)
181_2018_1466_MOESM3_ESM.txt (0 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (TXT 0 kb)

References

  1. (2017) Time series reference manual. Stata PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Antweiler Werner, Frank Murray Z (2004) Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. J Finance 59(3):1259–1294Google Scholar
  3. Baker Scott R, Bloom Nicholas, Canes-Wrone Brandice, Davis Steven J, Rodden Jonathan (2014) Why has US policy uncertainty risen since 1960? Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 104(5):56–60Google Scholar
  4. Becker Sascha O, Woessmann Ludger (2013) Not the opium of the people: income and secularization in a panel of Prussian counties. Am Econ Rev 103(3):539–544Google Scholar
  5. Björk Bo-Christer, Solomon David (2013) The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. J Informetr 7(4):914–923Google Scholar
  6. Card David, DellaVigna Stefano (2013) Nine Facts About Top Journals in Economics. J Econ Lit 51(1):144–161Google Scholar
  7. Carrasco Raquel, Ruiz-Castillo Javier (2014) The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economists. Econ Inq 52(1):1–16Google Scholar
  8. Cromwell BA (1992) Does California drive the west? An econometric investigation of regional spillovers. Econ Rev Fed Reserve Bank San Franc 2:13–23Google Scholar
  9. Engemann KM, Wall HJ (2009) A journal ranking for the ambitious economist. Fed Reserve Bank of St. Louis Rev 91(3):127–139Google Scholar
  10. Frandsen Tove F, Jeppe Nicolaisen J (2011) Praise the bridge that carries you over: testing the flattery citation hypothesis. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 62:807–818Google Scholar
  11. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica 78(1):35–71Google Scholar
  12. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438Google Scholar
  13. Hamermesh Daniel S (2013) Six decades of top economics publishing: who and how? J Econ Lit 51(1):162–172Google Scholar
  14. Hamermesh DS (2014) Age, cohort, and co-authorship. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, Mamuneas Theofanis P, Stengos Thanasis (2003) Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(6):1346–1366Google Scholar
  16. Kalaitzidakis Pantelis, Mamuneas Theofanis P, Stengos Thanasis (2011) An updated ranking of academic journals in economics. Can J Econ 44(4):1525–1538Google Scholar
  17. Katranidis Stelios, Panagiotidis Theodore, Zontanos Costas (2017) Economists, research performance and national inbreeding: north versus south. Econ Notes 46(1):145–163Google Scholar
  18. Kelly Michael A, Bruestle Stephen (2011) Trend of subjects published in economics journals 1969–2007. Econ Inq 49(3):658–673Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy P (2003) A guide to econometrics, 5th edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim E Han, Morse Adair, Zingales Luigi (2006) What has mattered to economics since 1970. J Econ Perspect 20(4):189–202Google Scholar
  21. Kolstad C (2010) Environmental economics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosnik L-R (2014) Determinants of contract completeness: an environmental regulatory application. Int Rev Law Econ 37:198–208Google Scholar
  23. Kosnik L-R (2015) What have economists been doing for the last 50 years? A text analysis of published academic research from 1960–2010. Economics 9:1–38Google Scholar
  24. Kosnik L-R (2016) In tandem or out of sync? Academic economics research and public policy measures. Contemp Econ Policy 34(1):190–202Google Scholar
  25. Laband David N, Tollison Robert D (2000) Intellectual collaboration. J Polit Econ 108(3):632–662Google Scholar
  26. Laband David N, Tollison Robert D, Karahan Gokhan (2002) Quality control in economics. Kyklos 55:315–334Google Scholar
  27. Lange Lydia, Frensch P (1999) Gaining scientific recognition by position: does editorship increase citation rates? Scientometrics 44(3):459–486Google Scholar
  28. Leydesdorff Loet (2008) Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59(2):278–287Google Scholar
  29. Mason Paul M, Steagall Jeffrey W, Fabrituist Michael M (1992) Publication delays in articles in economics: what to do about them. Appl Econ 24(8):859–874Google Scholar
  30. Nelson Charles R (1979) Granger causality and the natural rate hypothesis. J Polit Econ 87(2):390–394Google Scholar
  31. Perman R, Ma Y, Common M, Maddison D, Mcgilvray J (2012) Natural resource and environmental economics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  32. Posner RA (1999) The theory and practice of citations analysis, with special reference to law and economics. John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 83Google Scholar
  33. Rosell Carlos, Agrawal Ajay (2009) Have university knowledge flows narrowed? evidence from patent data. Res Policy 38:1–13Google Scholar
  34. Tetlock Paul C (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market. J Finance 62(3):1139–1168Google Scholar
  35. Thurman Walter N, Fisher Mark E (1988) Chickens, eggs, and causality, or which came first? Am J Agr Econ 70(2):237–238Google Scholar
  36. Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2012) Environmental and natural resource economics, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsay RS (2002) Analysis of financial time series. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Weterings Anet, Ponds Rokerik (2009) Do regional and non-regional knowledge flows differ? an empirical study on clustered firms in the dutch life sciences and computing services industry. Ind Innov 16(1):11–31Google Scholar
  39. Whaples Robert (1991) A quantitative history of the journal of economic history and the cliometric revolution. J Econ Hist 51(2):289–301Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ManagementMetropolitan State UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations