Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 703–733 | Cite as

Dynamic panel data estimation of an integrated Grossman and Becker–Murphy model of health and addiction

  • Andrew M. Jones
  • Audrey Laporte
  • Nigel Rice
  • Eugenio ZucchelliEmail author
Article

Abstract

We propose a dynamic panel data approach to estimate a model that integrates the Becker–Murphy theory of rational addiction with the Grossman model of health investment. We define an individual’s lifetime smoking consumption and investments in health capital as simultaneous choices within a single optimisation problem. We show that this can be estimated using GMM system estimation of two stand-alone single fourth-order difference equations of health capital and smoking. These preserve roots and fundamental dynamics of the original system of four interrelated first-order equations. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that this reduced-form dynamic estimation also produces very similar estimates to the ones of the initial system of equations. We argue that, in the presence of long panel data, this approach may provide a feasible alternative for the estimation of a complex life-cycle model of human capital.

Keywords

Addiction Health capital Smoking Dynamic panel data models 

JEL classification

C1 C3 C5 C6 I1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) under Grant Reference RES-060-25-0045. We are grateful to Victor Aguirregabiria, Jonneke Bohlaar, Brenda Gannon, Eleonora Fichera, Aloysius Siow, Matt Sutton, and participants of the 8th International Health Economics Association (iHEA) Congress in Toronto, the 9th European Conference on Health Economics (ECHE) in Zurich, the 2012 Applied Health Econometrics Symposium at the University of Leeds, the 2012 Netspar Conference on Health and Inequality in the Life-cycle in Rotterdam as well as participants of seminars at Universities of Barcelona, Leeds, Newcastle, Toronto and York for discussions and helpful comments. Data from the British Household Panel Survey were supplied by the Economic and Social Research Council Data Archive. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Archive bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretations presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. Adams P, Hurd MD, McFadden D, Merrill A, Ribeiro T (2003) Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. J Econom 112:3–56Google Scholar
  2. Adda J, Cornaglia F (2006) Taxes, cigarette consumption, and smoking intensity. Am Econ Rev 96(4):1013–1028Google Scholar
  3. Adda J, Cornaglia F (2010) The effect of bans and taxes on passive smoking. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(1):1–32Google Scholar
  4. Adda J, Lechene V (2013) Health selection and the effect of smoking on mortality. Scand J Econ 115(3):902–931Google Scholar
  5. Arcidiacono P (2007) Living rationally under the volcano? An empirical analysis of heavy drinking and smoking. Int Econ Rev 48(1):37–65Google Scholar
  6. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297Google Scholar
  7. Balia S, Jones AM (2008) Mortality, lifestyle and socio-economic status. J Health Econ 27(1):1–26Google Scholar
  8. Baltagi BH (2007) On the use of panel data methods to estimate rational addiction models. Scot J Polit Econ 54(1):1–18Google Scholar
  9. Baltagi BH, Geishecker I (2006) Rational alcohol addiction: evidence from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey. Health Econ 15(9):893–914Google Scholar
  10. Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (2001) The econometrics of rational addiction: the case of cigarettes. J Bus Econ Stat 19(4):449–454Google Scholar
  11. Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (2002) Rational addiction to alcohol: panel data analysis of liquor consumption. Health Econ 11(6):485–491Google Scholar
  12. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1986) Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev Econ Stat 68(1):148–155Google Scholar
  13. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75(299):493–517Google Scholar
  14. Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96(4):675–700Google Scholar
  15. Becker GS, Woytinsky WS (1993) Human capital and the personal distribution of income: an analytical approach. In: Becker GS (ed) 1967. Institute of Public Administration, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Human Capital (3rd edn). University of Chicago Press, pp 102–158Google Scholar
  16. Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KM (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Am Econ Rev 84(3):396–418Google Scholar
  17. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143Google Scholar
  18. Blundell R, Bond S, Windmeijer F (2001) Estimation in dynamic panel-data models: improving the performance of the standard GMM estimator. In: Baltagi B, Fomby TB, Carter Hill R (eds) Nonstationary panels, cointegrating panels and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics, volumn 15. Elsevier, New York, pp 53–92Google Scholar
  19. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2):271–292Google Scholar
  20. Chaloupka F (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J Polit Econ 99(4):722–742Google Scholar
  21. Christelis D, Sanz-de-Galdeano A (2009) Smoking persistence across countries: an analysis using semi-parametric dynamic panel data models with sensitivity. Discussion Paper No. 4336, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA)Google Scholar
  22. Contoyannis P, Jones AM, Rice N (2004) The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey. J Appl Econom 19:473–503Google Scholar
  23. Darden M (2017) Smoking, expectations, and health: a dynamic stochastic model of lifetime smoking behaviour. J Polit Econ 125:1465–1522Google Scholar
  24. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I (2004) Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. Br Med J.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE Google Scholar
  25. Ehrlich I, Chuma H (1990) A model of the demand for longevity and the value of life extension. J Polit Econ 98(4):761–782Google Scholar
  26. Ferguson B, Lim GC (2003) Dynamic economic models in discrete time: theory and empirical applications. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Forster M (2001) The meaning of death: some simulations of a model of healthy and unhealthy consumption. J Health Econ 20(4):613–638Google Scholar
  28. Frijters P, Haisken-DeNew JP, Shields MA (2005) The causal effect of incoem on health: evidence from the German reunification. J Health Econ 24(5):997–1017Google Scholar
  29. Galama TS, van Kippersluis H (2015) A theory of education and health. CESR-Schaeffer working Paper No 2015-001Google Scholar
  30. Gilleskie D (1998) A dynamic stochastic model of medical care use and work absence. Econometrica 66(1):1–45Google Scholar
  31. Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A users guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, WindsorGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossman M (1972) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 80(2):223–255Google Scholar
  33. Grossman M (1993) The economic analysis of addictive behavior. In: Hilton ME, Bloss G (eds) Economics and the prevention of alcohol-related problems. NIAAA Research Monograph No. 25, NIH Pub. No. 93–3513. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, pp 91–123Google Scholar
  34. Grossman M (2000) Chapter 7: the human capital model. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ (1998) The demand for cocaine by young adults: a rational addiction approach. J Health Econ 17(4):427–474Google Scholar
  36. Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ, Sirtalan I (1998) An empirical analysis of alcohol addiction: results from the monitoring the future panels. Econ Inq 36(1):39–48Google Scholar
  37. Gruber J, Koszegi B (2001) Is addiction rational? Theory and evidence. Q J Econ 116(4):1261–1303Google Scholar
  38. Hai R, Heckman J (2014) A dynamic model of health, education and wealth with credit constraints and rational addiction. http://www.bus.miami.edu/_assets/files/faculty-and-research/conferences-and-seminars/economics-seminars/falls-2014/papers_Hai.pdf
  39. Hausman J, Taylor W (1981) Panel data and unobserved individual effects. Econometrica 49(6):1377–1398Google Scholar
  40. Jones AM, Labeaga JM (2003) Individual heterogeneity and censoring in panel data estimates of tobacco expenditure. J Appl Econom 18(2):157–177Google Scholar
  41. Keeler TE, Hu T-W, Barnett PG, Manning WG (1993) Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence. J Health Econ 12(1):1–18Google Scholar
  42. Labeaga JM (1999) A double-hurdle rational addiction model with heterogeneity: estimating the demand for tobacco. J Econom 93(1):49–72Google Scholar
  43. Leonard D, Long NV (1992) Optimal control theory and static optimization in economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307–310Google Scholar
  44. Lindström M (2010) Social capital, economics conditions, marital status and daily smoking: a population-based study. Public Health 124(2):71–77Google Scholar
  45. Lynn P (ed) (2006) Quality profile: British Household Panel Survey Version 2.0: Waves 1 to 13: 1991–2003. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  46. Meer J, Miller D, Rosen H (2003) Exploring the health-wealth nexus. J Health Econ 22:713–730Google Scholar
  47. Mellward D, Karlson S (2011) Tobacco use among minority ethnic populations and cessation interventions. A race equality foundation briefing paper, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426Google Scholar
  50. Pitchford JD (1977) Two state variable problems. In: Pictchford JD, Turnovsky SJ (eds) Applications of control theory to economic analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 127–154Google Scholar
  51. Saffer H, Chaloupka F (1999) The demand for illicit drugs. Econ Inq 37(3):401–411Google Scholar
  52. Wagstaff A (1986) The demands for health: some new empirical evidence. J Health Econ 5:195–233Google Scholar
  53. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kolinski M, Gandeck B (1993) SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Waters TM, Sloan FA (1995) Why do people drink? Tests of the rational addiction model. Appl Econ 27(8):727–736Google Scholar
  55. Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J Econom 126:25–52Google Scholar
  56. Zweifel P (2012) The Grossman model after 40 years. Eur J Health Econ 13(6):677–682Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew M. Jones
    • 1
  • Audrey Laporte
    • 2
    • 3
  • Nigel Rice
    • 1
    • 4
  • Eugenio Zucchelli
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Related StudiesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Institute for Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Canadian Centre for Health EconomicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Centre for Health EconomicsUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  5. 5.Division of Health ResearchLancaster UniversityLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations