Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 23–60 | Cite as

Does apprenticeship improve job opportunities? A regression discontinuity approach

  • Matteo Picchio
  • Stefano Staffolani
Article
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

In Italy the main difference between apprentices and other types of temporary workers is that apprentices must receive firm-provided training. The firm incentive in hiring apprentices consists in paying lower wages and labour taxes. Using an Italian administrative dataset containing information on the jobs started between January 2009 and June 2012, we estimate the effect of apprenticeship on the hazard function to a permanent job. Identification is based on a regression discontinuity design. We find that, for 29-year-old workers, apprenticeships are “long entrance halls” towards permanent contracts, especially within the firm where the apprenticeship is performed.

Keywords

Apprenticeship Temporary work Permanent work Regression discontinuity design Hazard function 

JEL Classification

C36 C41 J24 J41 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Pischke JS (1998) Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Q J Econ 113(1):78–118Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Pischke JS (2000) Certification of training and training outcomes. Eur Econ Rev 44(4–6):917–927Google Scholar
  3. Akoojee S, Gonon P, Hauschildt U, Hofmann C (2013) Apprenticeship in a globalised world. Premises, Promises and Pitfalls. LIT Verlag, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  4. Amuedo-Dorantes C, Malo MA, Muñoz-Bullón F (2009) The role of temporary help agency employment on temp-to-perm transitions. J Labor Res 29(2):138–161Google Scholar
  5. Arulampalam W (2001) Is unemployment really scarring? Effects of unemployment experiences on wages. Econ J 111(475):585–606Google Scholar
  6. Arulampalam W, Booth AL (1998) Training and labour market flexibility: is there a trade-off? Br J Ind Relat 36(4):521–536Google Scholar
  7. Askilden JE, Nilsen ØA (2005) Apprentices and young workers: a study of the Norwegian youth labour market. Scott J Polit Econ 52(1):1–17Google Scholar
  8. Autor DH (2001) Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training? Q J Econ 116(4):1409–1448Google Scholar
  9. Battistin E, Rettore E (2008) Ineligibles and eligible non-participants as a double comparison group in regression-discontinuity designs. J Econ 142(2):715–730Google Scholar
  10. Berton F, Devicienti F, Pacelli L (2011) Are temporary jobs a port of entry into permanent employment? Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Int J Manpower 32(8):879–899Google Scholar
  11. Boeri T (2011) Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, Part B, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1173–1236Google Scholar
  12. Boockmann B, Hagen T (2008) Fixed-term contracts as sorting mechanisms: evidence from job durations in West Germany. Labour Econ 15(5):984–1005Google Scholar
  13. Booth AL, Satchell SE (1993) Apprenticeships and job tenure: a competing risks model with time-varying covariates, CEPR Discussion Papers 762, CEPRGoogle Scholar
  14. Booth AL, Francesconi M, Frank J (2002) Temporary jobs: stepping stones or dead ends? Econ J 112(480):F189–F213Google Scholar
  15. Bosio G (2011) Duration dependence in the exit from a temporary job: does contract type matter? Polit Econ 1:49–82Google Scholar
  16. Cappellari L, Dell’Aringa C, Leonardi M (2012) Temporary employment, job flows and productivity: a tale of two reforms. Econ J 122(562):F188–F215Google Scholar
  17. Casquel E, Cunyat A (2008) Temporary contracts, employment protection and skill: a simple model. Econ Lett 100(3):333–336Google Scholar
  18. Clark D, Fahr R (2002) The promise of workplace training for non-college bound youth: theory and evidence from German apprenticeship, CEP Discussion Papers dp0518. Centre for Economic Performance, LSEGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark A, Postel-Vinay F (2009) Job security and job protection. Oxf Econ Pap 61(2):207–239Google Scholar
  20. Cockx B, Picchio M (2012) Are short-lived jobs stepping stones to long-lasting jobs? Oxf Bull Econ Stat 74(5):646–675Google Scholar
  21. de Graaf-Zijl M (2005) The economic and social consequences of temporary employment: a review of the literature, SEO Discussion Papers 47. SEO InstituteGoogle Scholar
  22. de Graaf-Zijl M, van den Berg G, Heyma A (2011) Stepping stones for the unemployed: the effect of temporary jobs on the duration until (regular) work. J Popul Econ 24(1):107–139Google Scholar
  23. Ellwood D (1982) Teenage unemployment: permanent scars or temporary blemishes?, chapter 10. In: Freeman R, Wise D (eds) The youth labor market problem: its nature, causes and consequences. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 349–390Google Scholar
  24. Faccini R (2014) Reassessing labour market reforms: temporary contracts as a screening device. Econ J 124(575):167–200Google Scholar
  25. Flinn C, Heckman JJ (1982) Models for the analysis of labor force dynamics. In: Basmann RL, Rhodes G (eds) Advances in econometrics I. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 35–95Google Scholar
  26. Gagliarducci S (2005) The dynamics of repeated temporary jobs. Labour Econ 12(4):429–448Google Scholar
  27. Gambin L, Hasluck C, Hogarth T, Ryan P, Elias P (2011) Options study for the long-term evaluation of apprenticeships, BIS research paper 56. Department for Business Innovation and SkillGoogle Scholar
  28. Gartell M (2009) Unemployment and subsequent earnings for Swedish college graduates: a study of scarring effects, IFAU working paper 2009:10. Institute for Labour Market Policy EvaluationGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaure S, Røed K, Zhang T (2007) Time and causality: a Monte Carlo assessment of the timing-of-events approach. J Econ 141(2):1159–1195Google Scholar
  30. Göbel C, Verhofstadt E (2008) Is temporary employment a stepping stone for unemployed school leavers? ZEW Discussion Papers 08-093. ZEW—Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung/Center for European Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  31. Gregg P (2001) The impact of youth unemployment on adult unemployment in the NCDS. Econ J 111(475):F626–F653Google Scholar
  32. Gregg P, Tominey E (2005) The wage scar from male youth unemployment. Labour Econ 12(4):487–509Google Scholar
  33. Hagen T (2003) Do fixed-term contracts increase the long-term employment opportunities of the unemployed? ZEW Discussion Papers 03-49. ZEW—Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung/Center for European Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  34. Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–09Google Scholar
  35. Hartman L, Liljeberg L, Nordström O (2010) Skans, stepping-stones, dead-end, or both? An analysis of Swedish replacement contracts. Empir Econ 38(3):645–668Google Scholar
  36. Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2):271–320Google Scholar
  37. Ichino A, Mealli F, Nannicini T (2008) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? J Appl Econ 23(3):305–327Google Scholar
  38. ILO (2012) Overview of apprenticeship systems and issues: ILO contribution to the G20 task force on employment. Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  39. ISFOL (2007) L’apprendistato tra regolamentazioni regionali e discipline contrattuali. Monitoraggio 2005–2006. Ministero del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale, Libri del Fondo sociale europeo 96Google Scholar
  40. ISFOL (2013) Monitoraggio sull’apprendistato: XIV rapporto. Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche SocialiGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins SP (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 57(1):129–38Google Scholar
  42. Kletzer LG, Fairlie RW (2003) The long-term costs of job displacement for young adult workers. Ind Labor Relat Rev 56(4):682–698Google Scholar
  43. Lancaster T (1992) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J Econ Lit 48(2):281–355Google Scholar
  45. Lilla M, Staffolani S (2012) Young entrants, temporary jobs and career opportunities: short-term perspectives of young Italian workers. Riv Stat Uff 14(1):50–60Google Scholar
  46. McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test. J Econ 142(2):698–714Google Scholar
  47. Mroz TA, Savage TH (2006) The long-term effects of youth unemployment. J Hum Resour 41(2):259–293Google Scholar
  48. OECD (2004) Employment outlook. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  49. Picchio M (2008) Temporary contracts and transitions to stable jobs in Italy. Labour 22(s1):147–174Google Scholar
  50. Picchio M, Staffolani S (2013) Does apprenticeship improve job opportunities? A regression discontinuity approach, IZA Discussion Papers 7719. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  51. Salant SW (1977) Search theory and duration data: a theory of sorts. Q J Econ 91(1):39–57Google Scholar
  52. van der Klaauw W (2002) Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: a regression-discontinuity approach. Int Econ Rev 43(4):1249–1287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesMarche Polytechnic UniversityAnconaItaly
  2. 2.SherppaGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations