Computational Statistics

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 623–638 | Cite as

H-relative error estimation for multiplicative regression model with random effect

Original Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Relative error approaches are more of concern compared to absolute error ones such as the least square and least absolute deviation, when it needs scale invariant of output variable, for example with analyzing stock and survival data. A relative error estimation procedure based on the h-likelihood is developed to avoid heavy and intractable integration for a multiplicative regression model with random effect. Statistical properties of the parameters and random effect in the model are studied. Numerical studies including simulation and real examples show the proposed estimation procedure performs well.

Keywords

h-likelihood Laplace approximation Asymptotic property 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Editor, the Associate Editor, and the anonymous referees for comments and suggestions that lead to improvements in the paper. This research is partially supported by funds of the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (No. 11231010) and National Natural Science of China (No. 11471302).

References

  1. Belenky G, Wesensten NJ, Thorne DR, Thomas ML, Sing HC, Redmond DP, Russo MB, Balkin TJ (2003) Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery: a sleep dose-response study. J Sleep Res 12(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen K, Guo S, Lin Y, Ying Z (2010) Least absolute relative error estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 105(491):1104–1112MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen K, Lin Y, Wang Z, Ying Z (2016) Least product relative error estimation. J Multivar Anal 144:91–98MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox DR, Reid N (1987) Parameter orthogonality and approximate conditional inference. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 49(1):1–39MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox GM, Cochran WG (1957) The use of a concomitant variable in selecting an experimental design. Biometrika 44(1/2):150–158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crouch EA, Spiegelman D (1990) The evaluation of integrals of the form \(\int _{-\infty }^{+\infty }f(x)\exp (-t^2)\): application to logistic-normal models. J Am Stat Assoc 85(410):464–469MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 39(1):1–38MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Ha ID, Lee Y, Song J-K (2002) Hierarchical-likelihood approach for mixed linear models with censored data. Lifetime Data Anal 8(2):163–176MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Karim MR, Zeger SL (1992) Generalized linear models with random effects; salamander mating revisited. Biometrics 48:631–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khoshgoftaar TM, Bhattacharyya BB, Richardson GD (1992) Predicting software errors, during development, using nonlinear regression models: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Reliab 41(3):390–395CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein JP, Lee SC, Moeschberger ML (1990) A partially parametric estimator of survival in the presence of randomly censored data. Biometrics 46(3):795–811MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee Y, Nelder JA (1996) Hierarchical generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 58:619–678MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee Y, Nelder JA (2001) Hierarchical generalised linear models: a synthesis of generalised linear models, random-effect models and structured dispersions. Biometrika 88(4):987–1006MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee Y, Nelder JA (2005) Likelihood for random-effect models. Stat Oper Res Trans 29(2):141–182MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu X, Lin Y, Wang Z (2016) Group variable selection for relative error regression. J Stat Plan Inference 175:40–50MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Makridakis SG (1985) The forecasting accuracy of major time series methods. J R Stat Soc Ser D (The Statistician) 34(2):261–262Google Scholar
  17. Narula SC, Wellington JF (1977) Prediction, linear regression and the minimum sum of relative errors. Technometrics 19(2):185–190CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Paik MC, Lee Y, Ha ID (2015) Frequentist inference on random effects based on summarizability. Stat Sin 25:1107–1132MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Park H, Stefanski L (1998) Relative-error prediction. Stat Probab Lett 40(3):227–236MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58(3):545–554MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Portnoy S, Koenker R et al (1997) The gaussian hare and the laplacian tortoise: computability of squared-error versus absolute-error estimators. Stat Sci 12(4):279–300MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Rao JNK (2003) Small area estimation. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson GK (1991) That blup is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat Sci 6(1):15–32MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Stigler SM (1981) Gauss and the invention of least squares. Ann Stat 9(3):465–474MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Tierney L, Kadane JB (1986) Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 81(393):82–86MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaida F, Meng X (2004) Mixed linears models and the em algorithm in applied bayesian and causal inference from an incomplete data perspective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Z, Chen Z, Wu Y (2017) A relative error estimation approach for single index model. J Syst Sci Complex 30:1160–1172MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Z, Liu W, Lin Y (2015) A change-point problem in relative error-based regression. TEST 24(4):835–856MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Ye J (2007) Price models and the value relevance of accounting information. SSRN 1003067Google Scholar
  30. Zhang Q, Wang Q (2013) Local least absolute relative error estimating approach for partially linear multiplicative model. Stat Sin 23(3):1091–1116MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Finance, Management SchoolUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations