Advertisement

Development and kinetic evaluation of a low-cost temperature-sensitive shape memory polymer for 4-dimensional printing

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

4D printing has been evolving from traditional 3D printing in the past years as an enabling technology imparting additive manufacturing with unprecedented functionality of creating time-dependent geometries. However, the current development status presents both cost and technical barriers, keeping 4D printing from being accessible to the general 3D printer users, in particular those who already have traditional 3D printing machines. This paper reported the development and kinetic evaluation of a low-cost temperature-sensitive shape memory polymer for 4D printing. The shape memory polymer is made of polylactic acid (PLA)-thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) composite in the form of filaments under different weight concentration ratios through extrusion processes. The filaments were tested in an FDM process to make 4D printed structures. The experiment study reveals the relationship between the material concentration ratio, recovery rate of sample workpieces, and the number of repeating recovery cycles. In addition, dynamic characteristics such as recovery velocity, acceleration, angular velocity, and angular acceleration were also investigated to characterize the behavior of the shape memory polymer. At the end of the paper, examples are provided to demonstrate the capability of the shape memory polymer in FDM-based 4D printing applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

References

  1. 1.

    Zarek M, Layani M, Cooperstein I, Sachyani E, Cohn D, Magdassi S (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. J Adv Mater 28:4449–4454

  2. 2.

    Choi J, Kwon O-C, Jo W, Lee HJ, Moon M-W (2015) 4D printing technology: a review. 3D Print Addit Manufact 2(4):159–167

  3. 3.

    Mantovani D, El Feniant F, Laroche G, Fiset M (2002) Shape memory materials for biomedical applications. Adv Eng Mater 4(3):91–104

  4. 4.

    Choong YYC, Maleksaeedi S, Eng H, Wei J, Su P-C (2017) 4D printing of high performance shape memory polymer using stereolithography. J Mat Design 126:219–225

  5. 5.

    Yang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y, Li Y (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:2079–2095

  6. 6.

    Bakarich, Shannon E.; Gorkin, Robert; Panhuis, Marc In Het; Spinks, Geoffrey M, “4D printing with mechanically robust, thermally actuating hydrogels”, Macromol Rapid Commun, v 36, n 12, p 1211–1217, 2015

  7. 7.

    Zolfagharian, Ali; Kaynak, Akif; Khoo, Sui Yang; Kouzani, Abbas, “Pattern-driven 4D printing”, Sensors Actuators A Phys, v 274, p 231–243, 2018

  8. 8.

    Naficy, Sina; Gately, Reece; Gorkin, Robert; Xin, Hai; Spinks, Geoffrey M, “4D printing of reversible shape morphing hydrogel structures”, Macromol Mater Eng, v 302, n 1, 1600212 2017

  9. 9.

    Guo, Jinhua; Zhang, Rongrong; Zhang, Lina; Cao, Xiaodong, “4D printing of robust hydrogels consisted of agarose nanofibers and polyacrylamide”, ACS Macro Lett, v 7, n 4, p 442–446, 2018

  10. 10.

    Bakarich, Shannon E.; Gorkin, Robert; Naficy, Sina; Gately, Reece; Panhuis, Marc In Het; Spinks, Geoffrey M., “3D/4D printing hydrogel composites: a pathway to functional devices”, MRS Adv, v 1, n 8, p 521–526, 2016

  11. 11.

    McCracken JM, Rauzan BM, Kjellman JCE, Su H, Rogers SA, Nuzzo RG (2019) Ionic hydrogels with biomimetic 4D-printed mechanical gradients: models for soft-bodied aquatic organisms. Advanced Functional Materials

  12. 12.

    Roach, Devin J; Kuang, Xiao; Yuan, Chao; Chen, Kaijuan; Qi, H Jerry, “Novel ink for ambient condition printing of liquid crystal elastomers for 4D printing”, Smart Mater Struct, v 27, n 12, 2018

  13. 13.

    Kuang, Xiao; Chen, Kaijuan; Dunn, Conner K.; Wu, Jiangtao; Li, Vincent C. F.; Qi, H. Jerry, “3D printing of highly stretchable, shape-memory, and self-healing elastomer toward novel 4D printing”, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, v 10, n 8, p 7381–7388, 2018

  14. 14.

    Saed, Mohand O.; Ambulo, Cedric P.; Kim, Hyun; De, Rohit; Raval, Vyom; Searles, Kyle; Siddiqui, Danyal A.; Cue, John Michael O.; Stefan, Mihaela C.; Shankar, M. Ravi; Ware, Taylor H., “Molecularly-engineered, 4D-printed liquid crystal elastomer actuators”, Adv Funct Mater, v 29, n 3, 1806412, 2019

  15. 15.

    Mu, Quanyi, Dunn, Conner K.; Wang, Lei, Dunn, Martin L; Qi, H Jerry, Wang, Tiejun (2017), “Thermal cure effects on electromechanical properties of conductive wires by direct ink write for 4D printing and soft machines”, Smart Mater Struct, v 26, n 4:045008

  16. 16.

    Zhu, Pengfei; Yang, Weiyi; Wang, Rong; Gao, Shuang; Li, Bo; Li, Qi, “4D printing of complex structures with a fast response time to magnetic stimulus”, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, v 10, n 42, p 36435–36442, 2018

  17. 17.

    Momeni, Farhang; M.Mehdi Hassani.N, Seyed; Liu, Xun; Ni, Jun, “A review of 4D printing”, Mater Des, v 122, p 42–79, 2017

  18. 18.

    Zhang Z, Demir KG, Gu GX (2019) Developments in 4D-printing: a review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials

  19. 19.

    Lee, Amelia Yilin; An, Jia; Chua, Chee Kai, “Two-way 4D printing: a review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials”, Engineering, v 3, n 5, p 663–674, 2017

  20. 20.

    Mitchell A, Lafont U, Hołyńska M, Semprimoschnig C (December 2018) Additive manufacturing—a review of 4D printing and future applications. Additive Manufact 24:606–626

  21. 21.

    Ge Q, Sakhaei AH, Lee H, Dunn CK, Fang NX, Dunn ML (2016) Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 6:31110. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31110

  22. 22.

    Cai J (2016) 4D printing dielectric elastomer actuator based soft robots. In: Theses and Dissertations. 1680. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1680

  23. 23.

    Rosset S, Araromi OA, Schlatter S, Shea HR (2016) Fabrication process of silicone-based dielectric elastomer actuators. J Vis Exp 108:e53423. https://doi.org/10.33791/53423

  24. 24.

    Naficy S, Spinks GM, Wallace GG (2014) Thin, tough, pH-sensitive hydrogel films with rapid load recovery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(6):4109–4114

  25. 25.

    Ge Q, Dunn CK, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2014) Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 23:1–15

  26. 26.

    Meng Y, Jiang J, Anthamatten M (2016) Body temperature triggered shape-memory polymers with high elastic energy storage capacity. J Polym Sci 54:1397–1404

  27. 27.

    Zhang W, Chen L, Zhang Y (2009) Surprising shape-memory effect of polylactide resulted from toughening by polyamide elastomer. Polymer 50(5):1311–1315

  28. 28.

    Zhang, Quan; Yan, Dong; Zhang, Kai; Hu, Genkai. “Pattern transformation of heat-shrinkable polymer by three-dimensional (3D) printing technique”. Sci Rep. Vol. 5, 2015. 8936, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep/08936

  29. 29.

    Jing X, Mi H-Y, Peng X-F, Turng L-S (2015) The morphology, properties, and shape memory behavior of polylactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Polym Eng Sci 55(1):70–80

  30. 30.

    Sodergard A, Stolt M (2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Prog Polym Sci 27(6):1123–1163

  31. 31.

    Buj-Corral I, Domínguez-Fernández A, Durán-Llucià R (2019) Influence of print orientation on surface roughness in fused deposition modeling (FDM) processes. Materials 12(23):3834

  32. 32.

    Pérez M, Medina-Sánchez G, García-Collado A, Gupta M, Carou D (2018) Surface quality enhancement of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed samples based on the selection of critical printing parameters. Materials 11:1382

  33. 33.

    Raju M, Gupta MK, Bhanot N, Sharma VS (2019) A hybrid PSO–BFO evolutionary algorithm for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters. J Intell Manuf 30(7):2743–2758

  34. 34.

    Williams ML, Landel RF, Ferry JD (1955) The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. J Am Chem Soc 77(14):3701–3707

  35. 35.

    NinjaTek Technical Specifications. NinjaFlex 3D printing filament—flexible polyurethane material for FDM printers material data sheets. URL: https://ninjatek.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/NinjaFlex-TDS.pdf

  36. 36.

    Blaber, Justin; Antoniou, Antonia. Ncorr DIC Instruction Manual. URL: http://ncorr.com/download/ncorrmanual_v1_1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ye Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlson, M., Li, Y. Development and kinetic evaluation of a low-cost temperature-sensitive shape memory polymer for 4-dimensional printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04927-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • 4D printing
  • Shape memory polymers (SMP)
  • Polylactic acid (PLA)
  • Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
  • Fused deposition modeling (FDM)