Experimental analysis of manufacturing parameters’ effect on the flexural properties of wood-PLA composite parts built through FFF
This paper aims to determine the flexural stiffness and strength of a composite made of a polylactic acid reinforced with wood particles, named commercially as Timberfill, manufactured through fused filament fabrication (FFF). The influence of four factors (layer height, nozzle diameter, fill density, and printing velocity) is studied through an L27Taguchi orthogonal array. The response variables used as output results for an analysis of variance are obtained from a set of four-point bending tests. Results show that the layer height is the most influential parameter on flexural strength, followed by nozzle diameter and infill density, whereas the printing velocity has no significant influence. Ultimately, an optimal parameter set that maximizes the material’s flexural strength is found by combining a 0.2-mm layer height, 0.7-mm nozzle diameter, 75% fill density, and 35-mm/s velocity. The highest flexural resistance achieved experimentally is 47.26 MPa. The statistical results are supported with microscopic photographs of fracture sections, and validated by comparing them with previous studies performed on non-reinforced PLA material, proving that the introduction of wood fibers in PLA matrix reduces the resistance of raw PLA by hindering the cohesion between filaments and generating voids inside it. Lastly, five solid Timberfill specimens manufactured by injection molding were also tested to compare their strength with the additive manufactured samples. Results prove that treating the wood-PLA through additive manufacturing results in an improvement of its resistance and elastic properties, being the Young’s module almost 25% lower than the injected material.
KeywordsAdditive manufacturing 3D printing Fused filament fabrication Young’s module Flexural strength Timberfill
Fused filament fabrication
Design of experiments
Analysis of variance
J.J. Roa acknowledges the Serra Húnter programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya for the financial support.
- 5.Afrose MF, Masood SH, Lovenitt P, Nikzad M, Sbarski I (2015) Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material. Progress Addit Manuf 1(1–2):21–28Google Scholar
- 9.Shabat D, Rosenthal Y, Ashkenazi D, Stern A (2017) Mechanical and structural characteristics of fused deposition modeling ABS material. Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University, Fascicle XII, Welding Equipment and Technology 28:16–24Google Scholar
- 12.El Margi A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreui S, Ebn Touhami M (2019) Mechanical properties of CF-reinforced PLA parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling. J Thermoplast Compos Mater p. 0892705719847244Google Scholar
- 20.Quintana R, Choi JW, Puebla K, Wicker R (2009) Effects of build orientation on tensile strength for stereolithography-manufactured ASTM D-638 type I specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(1–4):201–215Google Scholar
- 22.Maidin S, Mohamed AS, Akmal S, Mohamed SB, Wong JHU (2018) Feasibility study of vacuum technology integrated fused deposition modeling to reduce staircase effect. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 10(1S):633–645Google Scholar
- 24.Malinauskas M, Rekštytė S, Lukoševičius L, Butkus S, Balčiūnas E, Pečiukaitytė M, Baltriukienė B, Bukelskienė V, Butkevičius A, Kucevičius P, Rutkūnas V, Juodkazis S (2014) 3D microporous scaffolds manufactured via combination of fused filament fabrication and direct laser writing ablation. Micromachines 5(4):839–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Testing A.S.f. and Materials. Standard test method for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials by four-point bending. (2002) ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar