Advertisement

Metal cutting lubricants and cutting tools: a review on the performance improvement and sustainability assessment

  • Ali H. AbdelrazekEmail author
  • I. A. Choudhury
  • Yusoff Nukman
  • S. N. Kazi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The quality enhancement during massive production of the traditional machining products is a risky challenge when the cost and environmental impact must be considered. The tool life, material recycling, energy consumption, space, and environmental pollution are the direct and indirect factors to increase the cost during different machining processes. Treatment of cooling liquids to be eco-friendly and cheaper, and machining tools to enhance their surface morphology and increase their lives are the keys of the sustainable machining. This paper reviews the sustainability evaluation and the performance of different types of cooling fluids and lubricants, and surface texture modification of tool surfaces and their effects on the machining outputs and environment as well.

Keywords

Machining Sustainability Cutting fluids Nano cutting liquids Textured tools Tool coating 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance for this research was granted by the University of Malaya “Research University Grant” Program through project number GPF061A-2018 entitled “Textured Novel Cutting Tool for Sustainable Machining.”

References

  1. 1.
    Kalpakjian S (2001) Manufacturing engineering and technology. Pearson Education India, BengaluruGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal cutting. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adler DP, Hii WW-S, Michalek DJ, Sutherland JW (2006) Examining the role of cutting fluids in machining and efforts to address associated environmental/health concerns. Mach Sci Technol 10(1):23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andriankaja H, Le Duigou J, Eynard B (2015) Sustainable machining approach by integrating the environmental assessment within the CAD/CAM/CNC Chain. In: ICoRD’15–Research into Design Across Boundaries, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kovoor PP, Idris MR, Hassan MH, Yahya TFT (2012) A study conducted on the impact of effluent waste from machining process on the environment by water analysis. Int J Energy Environ Eng 3(1):21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haider J, Hashmi MSJ (2014) Health and environmental impacts in metal machining processes. Compr Mater Process 8:7–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camposeco-Negrete C, de Dios Calderón-Nájera J (2019) Sustainable machining as a mean of reducing the environmental impacts related to the energy consumption of the machine tool: a case study of AISI 1045 steel machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(1–4):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sugihara T, Singh P, Enomoto T (2017) Development of novel cutting tools with dimple textured surfaces for dry machining of aluminum alloys. Procedia Manuf 14:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhuiyan M, Choudhury I, Dahari M (2014) Monitoring the tool wear, surface roughness and chip formation occurrences using multiple sensors in turning. J Manuf Syst 33(4):476–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(6):435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boothroyd G (1988) Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools, vol 28. Crc Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liew PJ, Shaaroni A, Sidik NA, Yan JC (2017) An overview of current status of cutting fluids and cooling techniques of turning hard steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 114:380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silliman JD (1992) Cutting and grinding fluids: selection and application. Society of manufacturing engineers, DearbornGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan CY, Lee WB, Wang H (2013) Enhancement of surface finish using water-miscible nano-cutting fluid in ultra-precision turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 73:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sreejith PS (2008) Machining of 6061 aluminium alloy with MQL, dry and flooded lubricant conditions. Mater Lett 62(2):276–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Satheesh Kumar B, Padmanabhan G, Vamsi Krishna P (2016) Multi response optimization for turning AISI 1040 steel with extreme pressure additive included vegetable oil based cutting fluids using grey relational analysis. J Adv Res Mater Sci 23(1):1–14Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bienkowski K (1993) Coolants & lubricants staying pure. Manuf Eng (USA) 110(4):55–56Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anton S, Andreas S, Friedrich B (2015) Heat dissipation in turning operations by means of internal cooling. Procedia Eng 100:1116–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deng J, Wenlong S, Hui Z (2009) Design, fabrication and properties of a self-lubricated tool in dry cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(1):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klocke FAEG, Eisenblätter G (1997) Dry cutting. CIRP Annals 46(2):519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bouzakis K-D, Michailidis N, Skordaris G, Bouzakis E, Biermann D, M'Saoubi R (2012) Cutting with coated tools: coating technologies, characterization methods and performance optimization. CIRP Ann 61(2):703–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bobzin K (2017) High-performance coatings for cutting tools. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kustas FM, Fehrehnbacher LL, Komanduri R (1997) Nanocoatings on cutting tools for dry machining. CIRP Ann 46(1):39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ducros C, Sanchette F (2006) Multilayered and nanolayered hard nitride thin films deposited by cathodic arc evaporation. Part 2: mechanical properties and cutting performances. Surf Coat Technol 201(3–4):1045–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yashar PC, Sproul WD (1999) Nanometer scale multilayered hard coatings. Vacuum 55(3–4):179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yao S-H, Su Y-L, Kao W-H, Liu T-H (2006) Tribology and oxidation behavior of TiN/AlN nano-multilayer films. Tribol Int 39(4):332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    PalDey S, Deevi SC (2003) Single layer and multilayer wear resistant coatings of (Ti,Al)N: a review. Mater Sci Eng A 342(1–2):58–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andersen KN, Bienk EJ, Schweitz KO, Chevallier J, Reitz H, Kringhøj P, Bøttiger J (2000) Deposition, microstructure and mechanical and tribological properties of magnetron sputtered TiN/TiAlN multilayers. Surf Coat Technol 123(2–3):219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knutsson A, Jõesaar MPJ, Karlsson L, Odén M (2011) Machining performance and decomposition of TiAlN/TiN multilayer coated metal cutting inserts. Surf Coat Technol 205(16):4005–4010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Çalışkan H, Kurbanoglu C, Panjan P, Čekada M, Kramar D (2013) Wear behavior and cutting performance of nanostructured hard coatings on cemented carbide cutting tools in hard milling. Tribol Int 62:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sharma V, Pandey PM (2016) Recent advances in turning with textured cutting tools: a review. J Clean Prod 137:701–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Demircioglu P (2017) In: Hashmi MSJ (ed) 3.17 Topological evaluation of surfaces in relation to surface finish, in comprehensive materials finishing. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 243–260Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gachot C, Rosenkranz A, Hsu SM, Costa HL (2017) A critical assessment of surface texturing for friction and wear improvement. Wear 372-373:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arulkirubakaran D, Senthilkumar V, Lomesh CV, Senthil P (2019) Performance of surface textured tools during machining of Al-Cu/TiB2 composite. Measurement 137:636–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2016) Influence of cutting fluid conditions and cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear in turning process using Taguchi method. Measurement 78:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Çakīr O, Yardimeden A, Ozben T, Kilickap E (2007) Selection of cutting fluids in machining processes. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 25(2):99–102Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smith GT (2008) Cutting tool technology: industrial handbook. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dennison MS, Sivaram NM, Barik D, Ponnusamy S (2019) Turning operation of AISI 4340 steel in flooded, near-dry and dry conditions: a comparative study on tool-work interface temperature. Mech Mech Eng 23(1):–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Krolczyk JB, Mia M, Wojciechowski S, Nieslony P, Budzik G (2019) Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production—a review. J Clean Prod 218:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Revuru RS, Posinasetti NR, Venkata Ramana VSN, Amrita M (2017) Application of cutting fluids in machining of titanium alloys—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5):2477–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elmunafi MHS, Noordin M, Kurniawan D (2015) Tool life of coated carbide cutting tool when turning hardened stainless steel under minimum quantity lubricant using castor oil. Procedia Manuf 2:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anuja Beatrice B, Kirubakaran E, Thangaiah PRJ, Wins KLD (2014) Surface roughness prediction using artificial neural network in hard turning of AISI H13 steel with minimal cutting fluid application. Procedia Eng 97:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Arulraj JGA, Wins KLD, Raj A (2014) Artificial neural network assisted sensor fusion model for predicting surface roughness during hard turning of H13 steel with minimal cutting fluid application. Procedia Mater Sci 5:2338–2346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Alden Kendall L (1998) Friction and wear of cutting tools and cutting tool materials. ASM Metal Handbook, ASM International, The Materials Information Society 18:609–620Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Boswell B, Islam MN, Davies IJ, Ginting YR, Ong AK (2017) A review identifying the effectiveness of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) during conventional machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    ASME (1952) Manual on Cutting of Metals: With Single-point Tools. ASME, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lawal S, Choudhury I, Nukman Y (2012) Application of vegetable oil-based metalworking fluids in machining ferrous metals—a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hosseini SB, Dahlgren R, Ryttberg K, Klement U (2014) Dissolution of iron-chromium carbides during white layer formation induced by hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. Procedia CIRP 14:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    O’sullivan D, Cotterell M (2001) Temperature measurement in single point turning. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Satheesh Kumar B, Padmanabhan G, Vamsi Krishna P (2016) Performance assessment of vegetable oil based cutting fluids with extreme pressure additive in machining. J Adv Res Mater Sci 19:1–13Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nizamuddin M, Agrawal SM, Patil N (2018) The effect of Karanja based soluble cutting fluid on chips formation in orthogonal cutting process of AISI 1045 steel. Procedia Manuf 20:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Soković M, Mijanović K (2001) Ecological aspects of the cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes. J Mater Process Technol 109(1–2):181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Klocke F, Kuchle A (2009) Manufacturing processes, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E, Simsek BT (2013) Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J Clean Prod 42:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Demirbas E (2013) Environmentally friendly machining: vegetable based cutting fluids. In: Green manufacturing processes and systems. Springer, pp 23–47Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Singh R, Bajpai V (2015) Coolant and lubrication in machining. In: Nee AYC (ed) Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. Springer London, London, pp 981–1018Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gajrani KK, Suvin PS, VasuKailas S, Sankar MR (2019) Hard machining performance of indigenously developed green cutting fluid using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid. J Clean Prod 206:108–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gajrani KK, Ram D, Ravi Sankar M (2017) Biodegradation and hard machining performance comparison of eco-friendly cutting fluid and mineral oil using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid techniques. J Clean Prod 165:1420–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172(2):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shankar S, Mohanraj T, Ponappa K (2017) Influence of vegetable based cutting fluids on cutting force and vibration signature during milling of aluminium metal matrix composites. J Tribol 12:1–17Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Talib N, Sasahara H, Rahim EA (2017) Evaluation of modified jatropha-based oil with hexagonal boron nitride particle as a biolubricant in orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Agrawal SM, Patil NG (2018) Experimental study of non edible vegetable oil as a cutting fluid in machining of M2 steel using MQL. Procedia Manuf 20:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lokesh Srinivasan S, Vimalathithan R, Manojkumar MV (2018) Alternative cutting fluids for metal cutting operations. Mater Today Proc 5(2, Part 2):7758–7764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mamidi V, Xavior A (2012) A review on selection of cutting fluids. 1:2277–1174Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Grzesik W (2017) Chapter Ten—cutting fluids. In: Grzesik W (ed) advanced machining processes of metallic materials, 2nd edn. Elsevier, pp 183–195Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fernandes A, Vinhal JO, Dutra AJB, Cassella RJ (2019) Study of the extraction of Ca, Mg and Zn from different types of lubricating oils (mineral, semi-synthetic and synthetic) employing the emulsion breaking strategy. Microchem J 145:1112–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Abdelrazek AH, Alawi OA, Kazi SN, Yusoff N, Chowdhury Z, Sarhan AAD (2018) A new approach to evaluate the impact of thermophysical properties of nanofluids on heat transfer and pressure drop. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 95:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mohammed H, Alawi O, Sidik NC (2016) Mixed convective nanofluids flow in a channel having forward-facing step with baffle. J Adv Res Appl Mech 24:1–21Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Maryam H, Ali RS, Abdelrazek H, Mallah AR, Kazi SN, Chew BT, Rozali S, Yusoff N (2018) Numerical study of turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids containing eco-friendly treated carbon nanotubes through a concentric annular heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 127:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rad Sadri MH, Kazi SN, Bagheri S, Abdelrazek AH, Ahmadi G, Zubir N, Ahmad R, Abidin NIZ (2017) A facile, bio-based, novel approach for synthesis of covalently functionalized graphene nanoplatelet nano-coolants toward improved thermo-physical and heat transfer properties. J Colloid Interface SciGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N (1993) Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultrafine particles (dispersion of c-Al2O3, SiO2, and TiO2ultra-fine particles). Netsu Bussei 7(4):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Choi SUS, Eastman J (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Argonne National Lab, LemontGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kolade B, Goodson KE, Eaton JK (2009) Convective performance of nanofluids in a laminar thermally developing tube flow. J Heat TransferGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kazi SN, Badarudin A, Zubir MN, Ming HN, Misran M, Sadeghinezhad E, Mehrali M, Syuhada NI (2015) Investigation on the use of graphene oxide as novel surfactant to stabilize weakly charged graphene nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yarmand H, Zulkifli NWBM, Gharehkhani S, Shirazi SFS, Alrashed AAAA, Ali MAB, Dahari M, Kazi SN (2017) Convective heat transfer enhancement with graphene nanoplatelet/platinum hybrid nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 88:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Alawi OA, Sidik NAC, Xian HW, Kean TH, Kazi SN (2018) Thermal conductivity and viscosity models of metallic oxides nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 116(Supplement C):1314–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sharma AK, Singh RK, Dixit AR, Tiwari AK (2017) Novel uses of alumina-MoS2 hybrid nanoparticle enriched cutting fluid in hard turning of AISI 304 steel. J Manuf Process 30:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sidik NAC, Samion S, Ghaderian J, Yazid MNAWM (2017) Recent progress on the application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication machining: a review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 108:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Joly-Pottuz L, Bucholz EW, Matsumoto N, Phillpot SR, Sinnott SB, Ohmae N, Martin JM (2009) Friction properties of carbon nano-onions from experiment and computer simulations. Tribol Lett 37(1):75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Agapiou JS (2018) Performance evaluation of cutting fluids with carbon nano-onions as lubricant additives. Procedia Manuf 26:1429–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Li G, Yi S, Li N, Pan W, Wen C, Ding S (2019) Quantitative analysis of cooling and lubricating effects of graphene oxide nanofluids in machining titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol 271:584–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gajrani KK, Suvin PS, Kailas SV, Mamilla RS (2019) Thermal, rheological, wettability and hard machining performance of MoS2 and CaF2 based minimum quantity hybrid nano-green cutting fluids. J Mater Process Technol 266:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    De Oliveira D, Da Silva RB, Gelamo RV (2019) Influence of multilayer graphene platelet concentration dispersed in semi-synthetic oil on the grinding performance of Inconel 718 alloy under various machining conditions. Wear 426-427:1371–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Yıldırım ÇV (2019) Experimental comparison of the performance of nanofluids, cryogenic and hybrid cooling in turning of Inconel 625. Tribol Int 137:366–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Singh R k, Sharma AK, Bishwajeet, Mandal V, Gaurav K, Nag A, Kumar A, Dixit AR, Mandal A, Das AK (2018) Influence of graphene-based nanofluid with minimum quantity lubrication on surface roughness and cutting temperature in turning operation. Mater Today Proc 5(11, Part 3):24578–24586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Pawel L (2009) Urban, nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manag 29(9):2587–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Podgorkov VV, Kapustin AS, Godlevski VA (1998) Water steam lubrication during machining. Tribologia 6:890–901Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Çakır O, Kıyak M, Altan E (2004) Comparison of gases applications to wet and dry cuttings in turning. J Mater Process Technol 153:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Altan E, Kiyak M, Cakir O (2002) The effect of oxygen gas application into cutting zone on machining. in Proceedings of Sixth Biennial Conference on Engineering system Design and Analysis (ESDA2002), IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Liu J, Han R, Sun Y (2005) Research on experiments and action mechanism with water vapor as coolant and lubricant in green cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(6):687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Liu J, Liu H, Han R, Wang Y (2010) The study on lubrication action with water vapor as coolant and lubricant in cutting ANSI 304 stainless steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(3):260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tazehkandi AH, Shabgard M, Kiani G, Pilehvarian F (2016) Investigation of the influences of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) tool on the reduction of cutting fluid consumption and increase of machining parameters range in turning Inconel 783 using spray mode of cutting fluid with compressed air. J Clean Prod 135:1637–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Mia M, Gupta MK, Singh G, Królczyk G, Pimenov DY (2018) An approach to cleaner production for machining hardened steel using different cooling-lubrication conditions. J Clean Prod 187:1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Dilbag S, Rao PV (2008) Performance improvement of hard turning with solid lubricants. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(5–6):529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sam Paul P, Varadarajan AS (2013) Performance evaluation of hard turning of AISI 4340 steel with minimal fluid application in the presence of semi-solid lubricants. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 227(7):738–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ginting YR, Boswell B, Biswas W, Islam MN (2015) Investigation into alternative cooling methods for achieving environmentally friendly machining process. Procedia CIRP 29:645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Benedicto E, Carou D, Rubio EM (2017) Technical, economic and environmental review of the lubrication/cooling systems used in machining processes. Procedia Eng 184:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tazehkandi AH, Shabgard M, Pilehvarian F (2015) Application of liquid nitrogen and spray mode of biodegradable vegetable cutting fluid with compressed air in order to reduce cutting fluid consumption in turning Inconel 740. J Clean Prod 108:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Berk Z (2009) Chapter 20—Refrigeration, equipment and methods. In: Berk Z (ed) Food process engineering and technology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Yildiz Y, Nalbant M (2008) A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):947–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Hong SY (2001) Economical and ecological cryogenic machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(2):331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP (2000) Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear 239(2):168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Dix M, Wertheim R, Schmidt G, Hochmuth C (2014) Modeling of drilling assisted by cryogenic cooling for higher efficiency. CIRP Ann 63(1):73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2019) Performance improvement of cryogenic turning process during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel using multi objective optimization techniques. Measurement 136:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2018) Effect of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel: a comparison with MQL, wet, dry machining. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 21:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Damir A, Shi B, Attia MH (2019) Flow characteristics of optimized hybrid cryogenic-minimum quantity lubrication cooling in machining of aerospace materials. CIRP AnnGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Damir A, Sadek A, Attia H (2018) Characterization of machinability and environmental impact of cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia CIRP 69:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Suhaimi MA, Yang G-D, Park K-H, Hisam MJ, Sharif S, Kim D-W (2018) Effect of cryogenic machining for titanium alloy based on indirect, internal and external spray system. Procedia Manuf 17:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Pušavec F, Grguraš D, Koch M, Krajnik P (2019) Cooling capability of liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide in cryogenic milling. CIRP Ann 68(1):73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Kirsch B, Basten S, Hasse H, Aurich JC (2018) Sub-zero cooling: a novel strategy for high performance cutting. CIRP Ann 67(1):95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sharif MN, Pervaiz S, Deiab I (2017) Potential of alternative lubrication strategies for metal cutting processes: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5):2447–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Haider J, Hashmi MSJ (2014) Health and environmental impacts in metal machining processes. In: Hashmi S et al (eds) Comprehensive materials processing. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 7–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Vamsi Krishna P, Srikant RR, Rao DN (2011) Solid lubricants in machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 225(4):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Lathkar GS, Bas USK (2000) Clean metal cutting process using solid lubricants. In: Proceeding of the 19th AIMTDR Conference. Narosa, MadrasGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Sterle L, Kalin M, Pušavec F (2018) Performance evaluation of solid lubricants under machining-like conditions. Procedia CIRP 77:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Essa FA, Zhang Q, Huang X (2017) Investigation of the effects of mixtures of WS2 and ZnO solid lubricants on the sliding friction and wear of M50 steel against silicon nitride at elevated temperatures. Wear 374:128–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Sartori S, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2018) Solid lubricant-assisted minimum quantity lubrication and cooling strategies to improve Ti6Al4V machinability in finishing turning. Tribol Int 118:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Yang J-F, Jiang Y, Hardell J, Prakash B, Fang Q-F (2013) Influence of service temperature on tribological characteristics of self-lubricant coatings: a review. Front Mater Sci 7(1):28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Gunda RK, Narala SKR (2017) Evaluation of friction and wear characteristics of electrostatic solid lubricant at different sliding conditions. Surf Coat Technol 332:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Nageswara Rao D, Vamsi Krishna P (2008) The influence of solid lubricant particle size on machining parameters in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Makhesana MA, Patel KM (2019) Performance assessment of CaF2 solid lubricant assisted minimum quantity lubrication in turning. Procedia Manuf 33:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    World Commission on Environment Development “WCED” (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Part I: Common Concerns. Part 2. Towards Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Chetan, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2015) Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review. J Clean Prod 100:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Assenova E, Majstorovic V, Vencl A, Kandeva M (2012) Green tribology and quality of life, in International Convention on Quality – ICQ. BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Schwarz M, Dado M, Hnilica R, Veverková D (2015) Environmental and health aspects of metalworking fluid use. Pol J Environ Stud 24(1):37–45Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Madanhire I, Mbohwa C (2016) Mitigating environmental impact of petroleum lubricants. Springer, Berlin-GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Pervaiz S, Kannan S, Kishawy OA (2018) An extensive review of the water consumption and cutting fluid based sustainability concerns in the metal cutting sector. J Clean Prod 197:134–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Zhao F, Ogaldez J, Sutherland JW (2012) Quantifying the water inventory of machining processes. CIRP Ann 61(1):67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Chen JL, Chen Y-B, Huang H-C (2015) Quantifying the life cycle water consumption of a machine tool. Procedia CIRP 29:498–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    https://apps.webofknowledge.com. [cited 2019 June 12]
  132. 132.
    (2010) Chapter 1—deposition technologies: an overview. In: Martin PM (ed) Handbook of deposition technologies for films and coatings (Third Edition). William Andrew Publishing, Boston, p 1–31Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Klocke F, Krieg T (1999) Coated tools for metal cutting—features and applications. CIRP Ann 48(2):515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Dinesh Kumar D, Kumar N, Kalaiselvam S, Dash S, Jayavel R (2017) Wear resistant super-hard multilayer transition metal-nitride coatings. Surf Interfaces 7:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Abdoos M, Yamamoto K, Bose B, Fox-Rabinovich G, Veldhuis S (2019) Effect of coating thickness on the tool wear performance of low stress TiAlN PVD coating during turning of compacted graphite iron (CGI). Wear 422-423:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Zhao J, Liu Z (2018) Effects of thermo-physical properties of Ti0.41Al0.59N coating on transient and steady cutting temperature distributions in coated cemented carbide tools. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 96:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Vereschaka A, Grigoriev S, Sitnikov N, Oganyan G, Sotova C (2018) Influence of thickness of multilayer composite nano-structured coating Ti-TiN-(Ti,Al,Cr)N on tool life of metal-cutting tool. Procedia CIRP 77:545–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Kumar CS, Patel SK (2019) Effect of duplex nanostructured TiAlSiN/TiSiN/TiAlN-TiAlN and TiAlN-TiAlSiN/TiSiN/TiAlN coatings on the hard turning performance of Al2O3-TiCN ceramic cutting tools. Wear 418-419:226–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Kumar CS, Patel SK (2018) Effect of chip sliding velocity and temperature on the wear behaviour of PVD AlCrN and AlTiN coated mixed alumina cutting tools during turning of hardened steel. Surf Coat Technol 334:509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Kumar CS, Patel SK (2018) Performance analysis and comparative assessment of nano-composite TiAlSiN/TiSiN/TiAlN coating in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. Surf Coat Technol 335:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Wang S, Guo W, Ma H-a, Jia X (2014) Direct coating of cubic boron nitride with titanium powder under high pressure and high temperature. Mater Lett 123:210–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Mei HY, Cai XH, Tang M, Hui Q, Song Q, Wang M (2019) Electronic and mechanic properties of a new cubic boron nitride. Comput Mater Sci 162:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Ji H, Li Z, Zhu Y, Sun K, Li L, Zhao Y (2019) Mechanical property enhancement of cubic boron nitride composites through additive diamond. Diam Relat Mater 96:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Donnet C, Erdemir A (2004) Solid lubricant coatings: recent developments and future trends. 17:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Ammar Farhan, MS. Kasim Intan Sharhida Othman, Mohd Rody Mohamad Zin, and Jariah Mohamad Juoi, Various quarry dust content influences the tribological properties of Ni-P composite coating, in Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2019. Aug. 2019: Malaysia. p. 344–346Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Othman IS, Azhar MZE, Jun LP (2018) Tribological properties of malaysian quarry dust reinforced nickel matrix composite coatings. In: Proceedings of Asia International Conference on Tribology, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, pp 87–89Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Nalbant M, Gökkaya H, Toktaş İ, Sur G (2009) The experimental investigation of the effects of uncoated, PVD- and CVD-coated cemented carbide inserts and cutting parameters on surface roughness in CNC turning and its prediction using artificial neural networks. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25(1):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Evans CJ, Bryan JB (1999) “Structured”, “textured” or “engineered” surfaces. CIRP Ann 48(2):541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kawasegi N, Sugimori H, Morimoto H, Morita N, Hori I (2009) Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior. Precis Eng 33(3):248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Arumugaprabu V, Ko TJ, Kumaran ST, Kurniawan R, Uthayakumar M (2018) A brief review on importance of surface texturing in materials to improve the tribological performance. Rev Adv Mater Sci 53(1):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Arslan A, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Varman M, Mufti RA, Mosarof MH, Khuong LS, Quazi MM (2016) Surface texture manufacturing techniques and tribological effect of surface texturing on cutting tool performance: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 41(6):447–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2017) Performance of cutting tools with dimple textured surfaces: a comparative study of different texture patterns. Precis Eng 49:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Fatima A, Mativenga PT (2013) Assessment of tool rake surface structure geometry for enhanced contact phenomena. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):771–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2013) Crater and flank wear resistance of cutting tools having micro textured surfaces. Precis Eng 37(4):888–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Zhanjiang Yu, Q. Cai, Yiquan Li, Zhitong Wang, Wang X and Huadong Yu. Micro texture cutting tool simulation and experimental study on high speed micro-turnning. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. 2016. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Dhage S, Jayal AD, Sarkar P (2019) Effects of surface texture parameters of cutting tools on friction conditions at tool-chip interface during dry machining of AISI 1045 steel. Procedia Manuf 33:794–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Mishra SK, Ghosh S, Aravindan S (2019) Performance of laser processed carbide tools for machining of Ti6Al4V alloys: a combined study on experimental and finite element analysis. Precis Eng 56:370–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Zhang K, Deng J, Xing Y, Li S, Gao H (2015) Effect of microscale texture on cutting performance of WC/Co-based TiAlN coated tools under different lubrication conditions. Appl Surf Sci 326:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Obikawa T, Kamio A, Takaoka H, Osada A (2011) Micro-texture at the coated tool face for high performance cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Youqiang Xing JD, Jun Zhao GZ, Zhang K (2014) Cutting performance and wear mechanism of nanoscale and microscale textured Al2O3/TiC ceramic tools in dry cutting of hardened steel. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 43:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Bagaber SA, Yusoff AR (2017) Effect of cutting parameters on sustainable machining performance of coated carbide tool in dry turning process of stainless steel 316. AIP Conf Proc 1828(1):020013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Kasim MS, Haron CHC, Ghani JA, Hadi MA, Izamsha R, Anand TJS, Mohamed SB (2016) Cost evaluation on performance of a PVD coated cutting tool during end-milling of Inconel 718 under MQL conditions. Trans IMF 94(4):175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali H. Abdelrazek
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. A. Choudhury
    • 1
  • Yusoff Nukman
    • 1
  • S. N. Kazi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations