Advertisement

Experimental analysis and modeling of friction in sheet metal forming considering the influence of drawbeads

  • Salvatore LeocataEmail author
  • Thomas Senner
  • Helga Reith
  • Alexander Brosius
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

In sheet metal forming of automotive body parts, high quality standards are achieved by designing the material flow in the blankholder area. To reduce time and cost of the tool development, virtual methods are commonly used. Therefore, an accurate friction modeling is necessary to predict the material flow in the blankholder area correctly. The blankholder of industrial forming tools usually consists of a drawbead and an area with surface pressure. In this study, the influence of the drawbead on the friction is analyzed experimentally and considered in the simulation. The friction coefficient is determined before and after the drawbead pass in dependence of the normal pressure. A flattening of the surface peaks due to surface pressure and a roughening due to plastic strain are found as the main influencing factors on the friction after drawbead pass. In the simulation the friction is modeled based on the experimental results employing an enhanced method considering the influence of the drawbead. These modeling approaches are compared with the friction model of the commercial software TriboForm and the experimental results. For this purpose, the predictive accuracy of the restraining force of a drawbead with different pressure distributions on the blankholder is evaluated using a strip tensile test. This evaluation is further carried out for a different strain state at a cup drawing test. By considering the influence of the drawbead on the friction coefficient a significant increase in the predictive accuracy of the simulation can be achieved.

Keywords

Sheet metal forming Friction modeling Drawbead Surface roughness 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Roll K (2011) Application of virtual methods in automotive industry. In: Kolleck RH (ed) Tools and technologies for processing ultra high strength materials. Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz, pp 81–86Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hol J, Cid Alfaro MV, de Rooij MB, Meinders T (2012) Advanced friction modeling for sheet metal forming. Wear 286-287:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nielsen CV, Bay N (2018) Review of friction modeling in metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 255:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang W, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Hua M, Wei X (2016) A study on variable friction model in sheet metal forming with advanced high strength steels. Tribol Int 93:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sigvant M, Hol J, Chezan T, van den Boogaard T (2015) Friction modelling in sheet metal forming simulations: application and validation on an u-bend product. In: Hora P (ed) Advanced constitutive models in sheet metal forming. Institute of Virtual Manufacturing, pp 135–142Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zöller F, Sturm V, Merklein M (2015) Experimental and numerical investigation on a pressure dependent friction model. Key Eng Mater 639:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grüebler R, Hora P (2009) Temperature dependent friction modeling for sheet metal forming. Int J Mater Form 2:251–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tamai Y, Inazumi T, Manabe K (2016) Fe forming analysis with nonlinear friction coefficient model considering contact pressure, sliding velocity and sliding length. J Mater Process Technol 227:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hol J (2013) Multi-scale friction modeling for sheet metal forming. University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    230-213 VDA (2008) Test procedures for the product classes: Prelube, prelube 2, hotmelt spot lubricantGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filzek J, Groche P (2001) Assessment of the tribological function of lubricants for sheet metal forming. In: Totten GE, Wedeven LD, Dickey JR, Anderson M (eds) Bench testing of industrial fluid lubrication and wear properties used in machinery applications. ASTM STP 1404, pp 97–108Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Filzek J, Ludwig M, Groche P (2011) Improved FEM simulation of sheet metal forming with friction modelling using laboratory tests. Proceedings of the IDDRGGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu X, Liewald M, Becker D (2009) Effects of rolling direction and lubricant on friction in sheet metal forming. J Tribol 131(4):042101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merklein M, Zöller F, Sturm V (2014) Experimental and numerical investigations on frictional behaviour under consideration of varying tribological conditions. Adv Mater Res 966:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merklein M, Andreas K, Steiner J (2015) Influence of tool surface on tribological conditions in conventional and dry sheet metal forming. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 2(2):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou R, Cao J, Wang QJ, Meng F, Zimowski K, Xia ZC (2011) Effect of EDT surface texturing on tribological behavior of aluminum sheet. J Mater Process Technol 211(10):1643–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee BH, Keum YT, Wagoner RH (2002) Modeling of the friction caused by lubrication and surface roughness in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 130:60–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Payen GR, Felder E, Repoux M, Mataigne JM (2012) Influence of contact pressure and boundary films on the frictional behaviour and on the roughness changes of galvanized steel sheets. Wear 276–277:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karupannasamy DK, de Rooij MB, Schipper DJ (2013) Multi-scale friction modelling for rough contacts under sliding conditions. Wear 308(1–2):222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saha PK, Wilson WR (1994) Influence of plastic strain on friction in sheet metal forming. Wear 172 (2):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lucachick GA, Sanchez LR (2013) Surface topography changes in aluminum alloy sheet during large plastic straining under cyclic pure bending. J Mater Process Technol 213(2):300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Azushima A, Sakuramoto M (2006) Effects of plastic strain on surface roughness and coefficient of friction in tension-bending test. CIRP Ann 55(1):303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanchez LR, Hartfield-Wunsch S (2011) Effects on surface roughness and friction on aluminum sheet under plain strain cyclic bending and tension. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 4(1):826–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leocata S, Senner T, Saubiez JM, Brosius A (2019) Influence of binder pressure zones on the robustness of restraining forces in sheet metal forming. Procedia Manuf 29:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Livermore Software Technology Corporation: https://www.lstc.com/, Accessed on 01 march 2019
  26. 26.
    Larsson M (2009) Computational characterization of drawbeads: a basic modeling method for data generation. J Mater Process Technol 209(1):376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heinle I (2012) Application of evolutionary strategies to industrial forming simulations for the identification and validation of constitutive laws. University LeidenGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yoon JW, Barlat F (2006) Modeling and simulation of the forming of aluminum sheet alloys. In: Metalworking: sheet forming. ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jung J, Jun S, Lee HS, Kim BM, Lee MG, Kim J (2017) Anisotropic hardening behaviour and springback of advanced high-strength steels. Metals 7(11):480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taherizadeh A, Green DE, Yoon JW (2015) A non-associated plasticity model with anisotropic and nonlinear kinematic hardening for simulation of sheet metal forming. Int J Solids Struct 69-70:370–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yoshida F, Hamasaki H, Uemori T (2014) A model of anisotropy evolution of sheet metals. Procedia Eng 81:1216–1221. 11th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, ICTP 2014, 19-24 October 2014, Nagoya Congress Center, Nagoya, JapanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    ISO 25178-2:2012: Geometrical product specifications. Surface texture: Areal–Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pfestorf M, Engel U, Geiger M (1998) Three-dimensional characterization of surfaces for sheet metal forming. Wear 216(2):244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilson WR, Sheu S (1988) Real area of contact and boundary friction in metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 30(7):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    TriboForm Engineering: https://www.triboform.com/, Accessed on 01 march 2019

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Leocata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Senner
    • 1
  • Helga Reith
    • 1
  • Alexander Brosius
    • 2
  1. 1.BMW GroupMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations