Advertisement

Mechanism study of sinking electrical discharge machining using water-in-oil nanoemulsion

  • Hang Dong
  • Ming Li
  • Tong Liu
  • Yu Zhou
  • Yang Shen
  • Chi Ma
  • Xianwei Zhang
  • Yonghong LiuEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Water-in-oil (W/O) nanoemulsion can be an alternative working fluid to kerosene in sinking electrical discharge machining (EDM). W/O nanoemulsion can improve the material removal rate, reduce the relative electrode wear rate, and alleviate the pollution of conventional sinking EDM using kerosene. However, the mechanism of sinking EDM using W/O nanoemulsion is not fully understood. In this study, a set of comparative experiments of single-pulse discharge is conducted in W/O nanoemulsion and kerosene to clarify the discharge mechanism of W/O nanoemulsion. The main machining parameters, which are crucial in actual sinking EDM, including pulse duration, peak current, and electrode polarity, are investigated. Precise geometries of the corresponding craters generated at the critical discharge gap are determined by the combination of optical instruments and 3D-rebuilt method. The effect of the working fluid flushing on the discharge machining is also analyzed. The results demonstrate that by the introduction of nanodroplets, the critical discharge gap is enlarged in W/O nanoemulsion. Compared with kerosene, W/O nanoemulsion has higher viscosity and density, which leads to stronger restrictions to the plasma channel and the motions of bubbles; therefore, larger volumes of melted materials and craters are formed in W/O nanoemulsion. This difference between W/O nanoemulsion and kerosene rises with the increasing discharge energy. Moreover, the restriction effect from working fluid is insignificant in the case of negative electrode polarity.

Keywords

W/O nanoemulsion Electrical discharge machining Single-pulse discharge Recast layer Crater 

Notes

Funding information

This study received financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 16CX06016A), the Graduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum (East China) (Grant no. YCXJ2016058), the Key Pre-Research Foundation of Military Equipment of China (Grant no. 6140923030702), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51774316).

References

  1. 1.
    Yeo SH, New AK (1999) A method for green process planning in electric discharge machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(4):287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakraborty S, Dey V, Ghosh SK (2015) A review on the use of dielectric fluids and their effects in electrical discharge machining characteristics. Precis Eng 40:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Y, Ji R, Zhang Y, Zhang H (2010) Investigation of emulsion for die sinking EDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1-4):403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tönshoff HK, Egger R, Klocke F (1996) Environmental and safety aspects of electrophysical and electrochemical processes. CIRP Ann 45(2):553–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masuzawa T, Tanaka K, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita N (1983) Water-based dielectric solution for EDM. CIRP Ann 32(1):119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erden A, Temel D (1982) Investigation on the use of water as a dielectric liquid in EDM. In Proceedings of the twenty-second international machine tool design and research conference. Palgrave, London, pp 437–440Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koenig W, Joerres L (1987) Aqueous solutions of organic compounds as dielectrics for EDM sinking. CIRP Ann 36(1):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang X, Liu Z, Xue R, Tian Z, Huang Y (2014) Research on the influence of dielectric characteristics on the EDM of titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5-8):979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kunieda M, Yoshida M, Taniguchi N (1997) Electrical discharge machining in gas. CIRP Ann 46(1):143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kunleda M, Miyoshi Y, Takaya T, Nakajima N, ZhanBo Y, Yoshida M (2003) High speed 3D milling by dry EDM. CIRP Ann 52(1):147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu Z, Jun T, Masanori K (2004) Dry electrical discharge machining of cemented carbide. J Mater Process Technol 149(1-3):353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shabgard MR, Gholipoor A, Baseri H (2016) A review on recent developments in machining methods based on electrical discharge phenomena. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5-8):2081–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tao J, Shih AJ, Ni J (2008) Experimental study of the dry and near-dry electrical discharge milling processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(1):011002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Y, Liu Y, Ji R, Cai B, Shen Y (2013) Sinking EDM in water-in-oil emulsion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(5-8):705–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dong H, Liu Y, Li M, Zhou Y, Liu T, Li D, Sun Q, Ji R (2019) Experimental investigation of water-in-oil nanoemulsion in sinking electrical discharge machining. Mater Manuf Processes 34(10):1129–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fryd MM, Mason TG (2012) Advanced nanoemulsions. Annu Rev Phys Chem 63:493–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zahiruddin M, Kunieda M (2012) Comparison of energy and removal efficiencies between micro and macro EDM. CIRP Ann 61(1):187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Tan B, Ji R, Cai B, Zheng C (2014) Determining the energy distribution during electric discharge machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(1-4):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang M, Zhang Q, Wang H, Liu G, Guo T (2015) Research on a single pulse discharge to discriminate EDM and EAM based on the plasma tunnel and crater geometry. J Mater Process Technol 219:248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eubank PT, Patel MR, Barrufet MA, Bozkurt B (1993) Theoretical models of the electrical discharge machining process. III. The variable mass, cylindrical plasma model. J Appl Phys 73(11):7900–7909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tamura T, Kobayashi Y (2004) Measurement of impulsive forces and crater formation in impulse discharge. J Mater Process Technol 149(1-3):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshida M, Hanaoka D, Flynn B, McGeough JA (2011) Observation of craters formed by single pulse discharge by stacking cross sectional shapes: comparison of craters in liquid and air. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 225(8):1311–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang M, Zhang Q, Dou L, Liu Q, Dong C (2016) Comparisons of single pulse discharge crater geometries in EDM and EAM. J Manuf Processes 22:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shen Y, Ji R, Li Z, Zheng C (2014) Investigation on the influence of the dielectrics on the material removal characteristics of EDM. J Mater Process Technol 214(5):1052–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kunieda M, Lauwers B, Rajurkar KP, Schumacher BM (2005) Advancing EDM through fundamental insight into the process. CIRP Ann 54(2):64–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jeanvoine N, Holzapfel C, Soldera F, Muecklich F (2008) Microstructure characterisation of electrical discharge craters using FIB/SEM dual beam techniques. Adv Eng Mater 10(10):973–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kojima A, Natsu W, Kunieda M (2008) Spectroscopic measurement of arc plasma diameter in EDM. CIRP Ann 57(1):203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xia H, Kunieda M, Nishiwaki N (1994) Research on removal amount difference between anode and cathode in EDM process. J Jpn Soc Electr Mach Eng 28(59):31–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hang Dong
    • 1
  • Ming Li
    • 1
  • Tong Liu
    • 2
  • Yu Zhou
    • 1
  • Yang Shen
    • 3
  • Chi Ma
    • 1
  • Xianwei Zhang
    • 1
  • Yonghong Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringChina University of Petroleum (East China)QingdaoChina
  2. 2.School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-electronics EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Capital Aerospace Machinery CompanyChina Academy of Launch Vehicle TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations