Advertisement

Systematic modeling approach for analyzing the powder flow and powder energy absorptivity in direct energy deposition system

  • Shuo-Siou Jhang
  • Yu-Lung LoEmail author
  • Trong-Nhan Le
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Additive manufacturing techniques such as direct energy deposition (DED) have many advantages over traditional subtractive manufacturing technologies. However, the phenomena associated with the DED process, including the absorption and scattering of the laser radiation in the powder concentration region and substrate, thermal conduction, the formation and solidification of the melt pool, and so on, are extremely complex. As a result, it is difficult to determine the individual effects of the processing parameters on the quality of the final DED parts using experimental methods. Accordingly, the present study proposes a systematic approach for calculating the absorptivity of the laser radiation in the DED process. In the proposed approach, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are first performed to establish the dimensions and location of the powder concentration region. The powder mass distribution and number of particles in the concentration region are then attained via self-written MATLAB code. Finally, Monte Carlo ray-tracing simulations are performed to calculate the total powder energy absorptivity of the concentration region. It is shown that the total absorptivity of the whole system, including the substrate region and the powder particles, is in good agreement with the published experimental results. The effects of the powder mass flow rate and powder-gas flow rate on the average absorptivity of the metal powder and substrate are explored. It is shown that the powder energy absorptivity increases with an increasing powder feeding rate, but is insensitive to the powder-gas flow rate. Overall, the results presented in this study provide a useful insight into the initial thermal and state conditions of the powder particles entering the melt pool. As such, the proposed modeling approach plays an important role in performing high-fidelity numerical simulations of the DED process.

Keywords

Direct energy deposition (DED) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Energy absorptivity Coaxial nozzle 

Notes

Funding information

Financial support was provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant No. MOST 107-2218-E-006-051. The research was also supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under funding provided to the Headquarters of University Advancement National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) and subsequently allocated to the Intelligent Manufacturing Research Center (iMRC).

References

  1. 1.
    Zekovic S, Dwivedi R, Kovacevic R (2007) Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of gas – powder flow from radially symmetrical nozzles in laser-based direct metal deposition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:112–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin J (1999) Concentration mode of the powder stream in coaxial laser cladding. Opt Laser Technol 31(3):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan J, Battiato I, Fadel GM (2017) A mathematical model-based optimization method for direct metal deposition of multimaterials. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans 139(8):081011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tabernero I, Lamikiz A, Ukar E, López De Lacalle LN, Angulo C, Urbikain G (2010) Numerical simulation and experimental validation of powder flux distribution in coaxial laser cladding. J Mater Process Technol 210(15):2125–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu G, Li D, Zhang A, Tang Y (2011) Optics & Laser Technology Numerical simulation of metallic powder flow in a coaxial nozzle in laser direct metal deposition. Opt Laser Technol 43(1):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiang Z, Yin M, Deng Z, Mei X, Yin G (2016) Simulation of forming process of powder bed for additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(8):081002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan W, Qian Y, Ge W, Lin S, Liu WK, Lin F, Wagner GJ (2018) Meso-scale modeling of multiple-layer fabrication process in Selective Electron Beam Melting. Inter-layer/track voids formation. Mater Des 141:210–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moser D, Pannala S, Murthy J (2015) Computation of effective radiative properties of powders for selective laser sintering simulations. JOM 67:1194–1202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1386-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boley CD, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Calculation of laser absorption by metal powders in additive manufacturing. Appl Opt 54:2477–2482.  https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.002477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Argento C, Bouvard D (1996) A ray tracing method for evaluating the radiative heat transfer in porous media. Int J Heat Mass Transf 39:3175–3180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(95)00403-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fallah V, Alimardani M, Corbin SF, Khajepour A (2011) Temporal development of melt-pool morphology and clad geometry in laser powder deposition. Comput Mater Sci 50:2124–2134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations